Clay Leeds wrote:
Thanks for the respectful response. I'm aware that HEAD release is
adversely affected by MAINTENANCE work (hence the I don't want to start
a ware here, but... :-)), however, I posted this for a few of reasons:
1) fop-dev team might discuss this in light of the possibility of
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kerning I don't
know if it would be useful for full FOP, but it should be sufficient to
allow basic font metrics for CFF OpenType fonts.
Sounds good, i'm sure it will be useful for FOP even within kerning.
I haven't had a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25900.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25900.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Eliot (mostly),
On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:24 AM, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kerning I don't
know if it would be useful for full FOP, but it should be sufficient
to allow basic font metrics for CFF OpenType fonts.
Sounds good, i'm
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25990.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25990.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25990.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sorry about the fragment at the end of the main paragraph I wrote below
(darned TouchPad on my laptop is too sensitive... erm.. and I wasn't
paying close enough attention). Anyway, I don't have anything to add...
On Jan 8, 2004, at 6:50 AM, Clay Leeds wrote:
Eliot Kimber wrote:
I haven't had a
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kerning I don't
know if it would be useful for full FOP, but it should be sufficient
to allow basic font metrics for CFF OpenType fonts.
Sounds good, i'm sure it will be useful for FOP even within
From man diff
SYNOPSIS
diff [options] from-file to-file
..
OPTIONS
..
-u Use the unified output format.
The command I use to generate a unified diff is:
diff -u from-file to-file
I'm guessing (as I'm no CVS or diff expert!) you'll have to do this for
each file unless you
Clay Leeds wrote:
It's just a thought (and I'm not trying to look a gift-horse in the
mouth! :-)), but perhaps you could work with those working on the HEAD
branch, to make a unified diff for all changed file against HEAD.
It appears that the relevant files are identical in the HEAD and maint
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25900.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
It appears that the relevant files are identical in the HEAD and maint
branches.
Could be... After all, fonts were next on the redesign schedule. It
definitely will not hurt to enter the patch anyway.
Just to
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
It's just a thought (and I'm not trying to look a gift-horse in the
mouth! :-)), but perhaps you could work with those working on the HEAD
branch, to make a unified diff for all changed file against HEAD.
It appears that the relevant files are identical
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25900.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
Doh! It appears that I was developing against the head and not the maint
branch--not sure how that happened.
Did you run the diff w/o using any tags in particular? IIC if you don't, cvs
runs a diff against the
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Doh! It appears that I was developing against the head and not the maint
branch--not sure how that happened. I'm looking now to see if my head
code can be quickly retrofitted to the maint branch.
Ok, I was able to patch the maint files as well (for real this time) and
both
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25933.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25933.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25933.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25997.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25999.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Ok, I was able to patch the maint files as well (for real this time) and
both it and the head seem to work fine, which I would expect since all
my code really does is not read a couple of tables if the font is
OpenType CFF.
I will prepare diffs forthwith.
Ok, I have
I was, for some reason, under the impression that there was a
java.awt.FontMetrics implementation that did not delegate to the
built-in Graphics2D AWT font metrics. But now I can't find anything
except the org.apache.fop.render.awt.AWTFontMetrics class.
I see that the PostScript renderer is
I'm afraid you got it wrong. Talking about HEAD now: The AWT renderer
in HEAD is non-functional ATM. What you need to look at is
SingleByteFont (ex. Type 1) and MultiByteFont (ex. TTF) in the
org.apache.fop.fonts package. Both classes implement the FontMetrics
interface which lets you access glyph
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Eliot Kimber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me know if you need more from me on these
patches.
Cheers,
Eliot
Yes, an explanation in Bugzilla on what the patches
are for (I haven't been following the thread, and if
it takes some weeks to be applied, no one will
remember what they're
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25933.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
gmazza 2004/01/08 19:05:55
Modified:src/codegen properties.xsl
src/java/org/apache/fop/fo PropertyList.java
Log:
Bug 25990 (Patch by Finn Bock) errors in String-int conversions found.
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 +10 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25990.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
gmazza 2004/01/08 19:26:00
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr AddLMVisitor.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/table Body.java
Log:
Bug 25809 (Patch by Finn Bock) NPE for incorrectly created tables fixed.
Also changed text of warning message.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25809.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
33 matches
Mail list logo