Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, I would love to be able to output
alt-design's layout to PDF
without having to build a new interface mechanism.
I think you have that already in the render.Renderer
interface--which defines those methods that a Renderer
--- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SVG Generator can be added to an environment in
which Java 2D graphics
are already being produced, using the same
instructions which are used
on a Graphics2D object. The SVGGraphics2D object is
used instead, and
the same graphical operations
We have it already (to a certain extent)unless I fail to see the
point. We have:
org.apache.fop.svg.PDFDocumentGraphics2D
org.apache.fop.render.ps.PSDocumentGraphics2D
org.apache.fop.render.ps.EPSDocumentGraphics2D
Of course, it will take some more time to mature but the most important
parts
I use SVN at home and at work. With great success. Command line works
great and is very easy and intuitive. TortoiseSVN (Explorer Plug-In for
Windows) is also quite nice although on some not quite ordinary
operations the thingy seems to do a few things wrong messing up the
local working copy from
Glen Mazza wrote:
The FO input
cannot be fully
realised with a complete resolution of the properties,
which in turn
relies on layout. (Old argument, I know.)
Well, you should have taken the time to refer people to
places in the spec [1] which supported your
position-- maybe
Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12.06.2004 17:35:04:
It is no longer a concern of mine that FOP has returned to a monolithic
design, but I think it is a bit unfair to the new developers to imply
that
the XSL-FO standard mandates such a design, at least with the reasoning
that
has
Jeremias Maerki said:
I use SVN at home and at work. With great success. Command line works
great and is very easy and intuitive. TortoiseSVN (Explorer Plug-In for
Windows) is also quite nice although on some not quite ordinary
operations the thingy seems to do a few things wrong messing up
Jeremias,
...
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
We have it already (to a certain extent)unless I fail to see the
point. We have:
org.apache.fop.svg.PDFDocumentGraphics2D
org.apache.fop.render.ps.PSDocumentGraphics2D
org.apache.fop.render.ps.EPSDocumentGraphics2D
Of course, it will take some more time to
Victor Mote wrote:
Glen Mazza wrote:
The FO input
cannot be fully
realised with a complete resolution of the properties,
which in turn
relies on layout. (Old argument, I know.)
Well, you should have taken the time to refer people to
places in the spec [1] which supported your
position--
Noted. My instinct would be for us to wait about 6-9
months after several other projects move over. If no
problems with them, or at least no major problems,
then I think it would be fine for us to switch
products if other committers would like.
However, this will still require someone
10 matches
Mail list logo
