PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
Guys,
That goes for me as well. I would like to get in.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Vaidya, Raghavendra (CORP, GEITC) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:43 AM
Subject: RE: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
Guys,
I am one of the users of FOP
.
Vaidya, Raghavendra (CORP, GEITC) [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
01/10/2002 05:43:16
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
Guys,
I am one of the users of FOP for a very long time.
I would like to get involved in this project as developer
, or go the word style
route.
Thanks
Paul.
Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 27/09/2002 18:51:42
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
Paul Hussein wrote:
Al I want is an editor that that works with FO only.
I don't know
Hi Paul, Fabio, Victor, everybody,
I thought of founding a wysiwig editor project as well. My idea was
to base it on the eclipse platform (www.eclipse.org), because that
would save a lot of UI work. I also fancy Victor's vision about
separating the semantic XML and the sytlesheet. Comments
: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly, i wasnt intending to suggest that you guys pick this work up.
But
this forum seems the best to maybe chat about it and even spin another
group off. Plus there is lots of expertise out there and I may have
missed
a piece of software
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe for us to pickup the rendering part of AWT Renderer, create new
project with it, Then export as jar that fop could use maybe.
Probably, but I believe the primary task now is to give some attention to avt
viewer in redesign branch and only when it's ready,
Hi,
I checked out XSLfast. It's a nice start. But not advanced enough for
professional print in my opinion.
Marc
- Original Message -
From: Oleg Tkachenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:50 pm
Subject: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi,
I agree with Marc. It's not robust enough and combersome to figure out.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
Hi,
I checked out XSLfast. It's a nice start
]
Subject: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
Hi everybody,
this discussion is getting too esoteric. I am willing to put effort
into a new project as I have stated before. It basically depends on if
we are able to gather a strong enough team. However, I think we should
soon move the discussion
Hi all. I wonder if I can get some help.
I am currently using fo and fop to generate pdf documents for a large bank,
and it works beautifully.
We get the XML and apply a stylesheet to produce the document.
However, we have a requirements that means our using should have the
ability to edit
:
27.09.02 17:06 Thema: fo wysiwig editor
Bitte antworten
an fop-dev
editor, though, so perhaps you'd be
interested in marshalling some people together to do it.
-Original Message-
From: Gilles Crebassa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE : Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
Fop is free
Paul Hussein wrote:
Al I want is an editor that that works with FO only.
I don't know of anything out there right now that does what you are looking
for. FO is not intended to be an editable format, but rather an intermediate
format. The advantage to using FO is that it can be created pretty
14 matches
Mail list logo
