Please provide a link to your company's site so we can sample the ported
code. Thanks.
--
David B. Bitton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.codenoevil.com
Code Made Fresh DailyT
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Griffiths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fop-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2
[Jim Urban] As long as development of the C# version does interfere with
the development of the Java version, I have no problem with people
porting FOP to C#. However, I believe the primary effort should remain
the Java version.
> If C# FOP or Batik implementations keep pace with the Java state o
I concur (for whatever that's worth).
jw
Jim Urban wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
As long as development of the C# version does interfere with the developmentof the Java version, I have no problem with people porting FOP to C#.However, I believe the primary effort should remain the Java version.
60143
Voice: (630) 250-3045 x2164
Fax: (630) 250-3046
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kowalczyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: C# version of FOP
>
>
> This project would be very important to
This project would be very important to those of us that plan to use C#
when Mono (.NET CLR, C# Compiler on Linux/*NIX) is ready. I had always
expected to use Batik and FOP through webservices, decoupled from my
ASP.NET that will run on Mono in the near future.
If C# FOP or Batik implementations
-> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
-> Speaking as an individual committer I think it's excellent that
you've done
-> this. I happen to be completely language-agnostic and I'll use
anything that
-> works, including everything in the MS stable.
I agree.
-> Sarandos Steve wrote:
-> I wanted to
Hi, Steve
Speaking as an individual committer I think it's excellent that you've done
this. I happen to be completely language-agnostic and I'll use anything that
works, including everything in the MS stable.
I would recommend that you start a Sourceforge project to take this further.
Once you'v
