On Nov 25, 2004, at 2:56 AM, Christian Geisert wrote:
The Web Maestro wrote:
[..]
On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing the xml-fop/build/
folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6). My reasoning for this is
two-fold: 1. it contains the FOP web site (which I've spent a
significant amoun
On Nov 24, 2004, at 5:19 PM, Peter B. West wrote:
Clay,
Let me say, Clay, thank you *very*, *very* much for taking care of the
alt-design tab. Have I drawn your attention to the fact that I am
*very happy* that you have taken care of this?
(I have thanked Clay personally out-of-band for his wor
The Web Maestro wrote:
[..]
On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing the xml-fop/build/
folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6). My reasoning for this is
two-fold: 1. it contains the FOP web site (which I've spent a
significant amount of time to re-create).
The generated website should
The Web Maestro wrote:
BTW -- thanks *very* much for taking care of the alt-design tab, I
greatly appreciate the effort in simplifying our site.
Glad to be of service. If there are other things which anyone thinks can
improve the site (e.g. consolidating pages, removing
moved/incorrect/inapprop
> -Original Message-
> From: The Web Maestro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Also, Andreas is correct that the site is built from the source (and I
> didn't forget that! ;-)).
Yeah, make them sweat at least as hard as you --that way, your effort will
be even more appreciated :-)
Greetz,
An
On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:39 PM, The Web Maestro wrote:
On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:16 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
Also, the output on minotaur should be viewable via
ViewCVS anyway, correct? (We were doing manual
updates to the website to fix the breadcrumb issue--we
went through ViewCVS to find the correct pag
On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:16 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
For #1) Wouldn't we have to keep doing that whenever a
change is made to the website as a result? I'm
concerned with it falling out of sync with the
production website.
True, and this is a significant concern. Whomever updated the web site
would have
> -Original Message-
> From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --- The Web Maestro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing
> > the xml-fop/build/ folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6).
> > My reasoning for this is two-fold:
> > 1. it conta
--- The Web Maestro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2004, at 11:52 AM, The Web Maestro wrote:
> > On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing
> the xml-fop/build/
> > folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6). My
> reasoning for this is
> > two-fold:
> > 1. it contains the FOP web si
On Nov 24, 2004, at 11:52 AM, The Web Maestro wrote:
On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing the xml-fop/build/
folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6). My reasoning for this is
two-fold:
1. it contains the FOP web site (which I've spent a significant amount
of time to re-create).
2. i
Yeah, Glen...
On Nov 23, 2004, at 8:18 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
Clay,
I'm noticing a lot of .zips and .bak backup files in our cvs
directories [1] -- this seems unnecessary and a bit messy for a
version control system, as everyone who "cvs checkout"s or "cvs
updates" is now downloading these files.
Clay,
I'm noticing a lot of .zips and .bak backup files in our cvs directories
[1] -- this seems unnecessary and a bit messy for a version control
system, as everyone who "cvs checkout"s or "cvs updates" is now
downloading these files. Instead of zip files, usually the solution is
just to "cvs
12 matches
Mail list logo
