DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The junit-layout-standard target seems to broken on trunk...
[junit] Testcase:
markers_4.xml(org.apache.fop.layoutengine.LayoutEngineTestSuite$1):
Caused an ERROR
[junit] Expected XPath expression to evaluate to '0', but got ''
(XPath: //regionBefore/block[2]/lineArea/text)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42861.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Adrian Cumiskey a écrit :
The junit-layout-standard target seems to broken on trunk...
My bad, sorry. I didn't think of table cells with content of zero
length, which was the root of the problem... I've committed a temporary
hack as I'm in the process of heavily changing this part of the code.
On Jul 12, 2007, at 15:49, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Adrian Cumiskey a écrit :
The junit-layout-standard target seems to broken on trunk...
My bad, sorry. I didn't think of table cells with content of zero
length, which was the root of the problem... I've committed a
temporary
hack as I'm
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I thought for a moment it was my font detection patch until I sanity
checked myself and built a fresh trunk :-)
Adrian.
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jul 12, 2007, at 15:49, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Adrian Cumiskey a écrit :
The junit-layout-standard target seems to broken on trunk...
My
On Jul 12, 2007, at 18:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
New Revision: 555680
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=555680
Log:
TODO removed: use LayoutContext's stackLimit instead of the
availIPD parameter
Maybe one of the layout-experts should have a look at this to see if
I
Perhaps I am posting this question on the wrong list or perhaps my
question has been asked and answered before.
But to state my question again, why is it not sufficient to supply
FOP with a font metrics file and the font triplets in the
configuration file? Why does it seem that FOP needs
On Jul 12, 2007, at 20:12, Loran Kary wrote:
Hi
Perhaps I am posting this question on the wrong list or perhaps my
question has been asked and answered before.
The latter, in a way...
You asked the same question on fop-users a couple of days ago, where
the response was that FOP currently
Thanks Andreas,
I got a brief and vague response on the users group that left me
wanting more information. Whether or not I could contribute to a
potential solution, and that is a possibility, would depend on
whether the work involved would be major or minor. So I am trying to
get some
On Jul 12, 2007, at 21:00, Loran Kary wrote:
I would imagine that support for additional fonts beyond the Base14
would be pretty fundamental to PDF formatting and therefore if it
isn't fully implemented there must be a pretty good reason.
What I do seem to remember is that, when you use
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42861.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42861.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
15 matches
Mail list logo