On 19/06/13 02:40, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hi Glenn,
On 18/06/2013 11:12, Glenn Adams wrote:
To be more clear, I propose we replace FOP's implementation of UAX14 with
use of ICU's line break iterator, and that
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 19/06/13 02:40, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hi Glenn,
On 18/06/2013 11:12, Glenn Adams wrote:
To be more clear, I propose we
On 19/06/13 10:33, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Vincent Hennebert
vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 19/06/13 02:40, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hi Glenn,
On 18/06/2013 11:12, Glenn Adams wrote:
On 18/06/13 06:46, Glenn Adams wrote:
Is there a reason FOP doesn't use ICU for determining line break
boundaries? The FOP implementation of UAX14 (org.apache.fop.text.linebreak)
seems to be out of date and basically unmaintained. According to [1], a
number of Apache projects are using it,
My position is that it is costing us in interoperability (I mean lack
thereof) by failing to use ICU. I don't see any issue about size.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 18/06/13 06:46, Glenn Adams wrote:
Is there a reason FOP doesn't use ICU
To be more clear, I propose we replace FOP's implementation of UAX14 with
use of ICU's line break iterator, and that ICU becomes a standard
dependency for FOP.
However, before taking a decision on this, allow me to create a branch (on
github) that actually makes this change so that folks can
On 18/06/13 12:12, Glenn Adams wrote:
To be more clear, I propose we replace FOP's implementation of UAX14 with
use of ICU's line break iterator, and that ICU becomes a standard
dependency for FOP.
However, before taking a decision on this, allow me to create a branch (on
github) that
By interoperability, I mean interoperability with different language line
breaking requirements. For example, Thai (and a number of other languages)
requires dictionary based support for line breaking. ICU supports this
today, while it is highly unlikely we would ever add this support to the
Hi Glenn,
On 18/06/2013 11:12, Glenn Adams wrote:
To be more clear, I propose we replace FOP's implementation of UAX14
with use of ICU's line break iterator, and that ICU becomes a standard
dependency for FOP.
However, before taking a decision on this, allow me to create a branch
(on
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hi Glenn,
On 18/06/2013 11:12, Glenn Adams wrote:
To be more clear, I propose we replace FOP's implementation of UAX14 with
use of ICU's line break iterator, and that ICU becomes a standard
dependency for
Is there a reason FOP doesn't use ICU for determining line break
boundaries? The FOP implementation of UAX14 (org.apache.fop.text.linebreak)
seems to be out of date and basically unmaintained. According to [1], a
number of Apache projects are using it, including PDFBox, Xalan, and Xerces.
[1]
11 matches
Mail list logo