https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40667
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment
On Jan 11, 2007, at 13:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In FONode, it say:
//TODO Remove getLogger() method!
Yet everywhere around the code base it says foo.getLogger(),
in particular for FObj instances. What is the preferred way
to aquire a logger instance?
log is a protected static, so
Andreas L Delmelle writes:
log is a protected static, so if the class resides in the same
package, then you can use direct member access. Currently, in some
places, the properties seem to be routing the message to the FO's
logger, instead of using Property.log directly...
Or even
On Jan 11, 2007, at 19:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas L Delmelle writes:
log is a protected static, so if the class resides in the same
package, then you can use direct member access. Currently, in some
places, the properties seem to be routing the message to the FO's
logger, instead of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
no knowledge about). Yes, there is next step to
do to change all other protected Loggers for LMs, but for me it would be much
easier to to if we would deal with code tagging/modules/SVN branches instead
of direct text patches. Right now I've applied Patrick's patch and to change
other Loggers
/show_bug.cgi?id=40667
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-04 12:33 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
members and not classLog I had no knowledge about). Yes, there is next step
to
do to change all other protected Loggers for LMs, but for me it would be much
easier
, but it will also increase the number of loggers
considerably.
+1 from me. It bugs me every now and then but so far I've never had enough
energy to actually do something about it. I only changed something for the
breaking algorithm where it was essential for me to keep line break stuff apart
from page
/show_bug.cgi?id=40667
Summary: Change protected Loggers to private
Product: Fop
Version: 0.92
Platform: PC
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: general
AssignedTo: fop-dev
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
11 matches
Mail list logo
