Guys,
What do you think of removing entries in the FAQ section that are
specific to 0.20.5 and earlier versions? This would make it shorter, so
less likely to scare people away, and in the same time easier for them
to find the answer to their question. Plus it would stress the fact that
we no
Hi,
I have the following error when building the website with Forrest:
* [352/33] [0/0] 8.844s 0b compliance.pdf
Exception in thread main java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at java.util.LinkedList.addAll(LinkedList.java:278)
at
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Guys,
What do you think of removing entries in the FAQ section that are
specific to 0.20.5 and earlier versions? This would make it shorter, so
less likely to scare people away, and in the same time easier for them
to find the answer to their question. Plus it would
Good idea. Going further, we could think about splitting the FAQ into a
project part and a product part. To make the release procedures easier
we might want to split the website into a project website and a
product/release website. What we have now just takes too much work which
is at least partly
I'll look into it right away.
On 18.11.2008 12:40:11 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
I have the following error when building the website with Forrest:
* [352/33] [0/0] 8.844s 0b compliance.pdf
Exception in thread main java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
Ok, published, but man, have I got a mess of different Forrest versions.
Some work, some don't. That's what happens if you become a committer,
do some experiments and don't have the time to follow everything.
Anyway, the latest deployment is done with Forrest Trunk revision 656962
on Windoze and
On 17 Nov 2008, at 21:35, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
Just some more follow-up:
On 17 Nov 2008, at 20:40, Simon Pepping wrote:
Someone sent me a file which also shows problems with hyphenation:
fo:block hyphenate=truefo:inlineSome text ending in a space and
a period ./fo:inline/fo:block
If the
On 18 Nov 2008, at 12:14, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
What do you think of removing entries in the FAQ section that are
specific to 0.20.5 and earlier versions?
Good idea. +1
If we're going to keep the 0.20.5 tab for the moment, we may want to
move those FAQs there so they're not completely
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:59:07PM +0100, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On 17 Nov 2008, at 21:35, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
Just some more follow-up:
On 17 Nov 2008, at 20:40, Simon Pepping wrote:
Someone sent me a file which also shows problems with hyphenation:
fo:block
On 18.11.2008 12:14, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Guys,
What do you think of removing entries in the FAQ section that are
specific to 0.20.5 and earlier versions? This would make it shorter, so
less likely to scare people away, and in the same time easier for them
to find the answer to their
Thanx for that. That did work for me. And with that I was able to find out
where the page numbers are put on the pdf. I changed the code to put custom
page numbers on the generated pdf.
Thanx for ur help.
Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote:
On 17 Nov 2008, at 07:59, AshuSuri wrote:
Hi
Sorry, I
11 matches
Mail list logo
