Re: Completeness of fop-0.90alpha1-src
On 20.11.2005 11:21:55 Christian Geisert wrote: Jeremias Maerki schrieb: Ok, fixed, along with a few other things. Interesting how many little things you can find that delay a release. :-) With the current build in the branch we are able to create the 3 distributions that I see are necessary: - Source distribution - Binary distribution for JDK 1.3 - Binary distribution for JDK 1.4 and later (containing support for ImageIO) Ok, so we'll release three distributions? (just to make sure) Yes. I think they are necessary. To reduce the size of the 1.4 binary distribution we could think about removing the XML-related JARs. But IMO they don't hurt. What I don't get is the reason why you removed the javadocs from the binary distribution. Users who download the binaries have no way to build them themselves. snip/ Jeremias Maerki
Re: Completeness of fop-0.90alpha1-src
Jeremias Maerki schrieb: On 20.11.2005 11:21:55 Christian Geisert wrote: [..] Yes. I think they are necessary. To reduce the size of the 1.4 binary distribution we could think about removing the XML-related JARs. But IMO they don't hurt. What I don't get is the reason why you removed the javadocs from the binary distribution. Users who download the binaries have no way to build them themselves. They take up about ~2MB space and the old release didn't contain them too. IMHO those interrested can download the source and build them (we tell them how to dev/api-doc.html). But I'm ok with including them too. Uh, the link to online javadocs (build by Gump) doesn't work, I think we should provide them online in any case. -- Christian
Re: Completeness of fop-0.90alpha1-src
On 21.11.2005 10:48:24 Christian Geisert wrote: Jeremias Maerki schrieb: On 20.11.2005 11:21:55 Christian Geisert wrote: [..] Yes. I think they are necessary. To reduce the size of the 1.4 binary distribution we could think about removing the XML-related JARs. But IMO they don't hurt. What I don't get is the reason why you removed the javadocs from the binary distribution. Users who download the binaries have no way to build them themselves. They take up about ~2MB space and the old release didn't contain them too. IMHO those interrested can download the source and build them (we tell them how to dev/api-doc.html). But I'm ok with including them too. I personally expect the javadocs to be present in a binary release. The alternative is to publish a separate zip (fop-0.90alpha1-docs.zip) with the docs/ and /javadocs directory and remove them from the binary distribution. Uh, the link to online javadocs (build by Gump) doesn't work, I think we should provide them online in any case. Yes, that's probably broken ever since Gump got their Solaris zone and they moved to http://vmgump.apache.org. The problem is that they don't seem to create the federated javadocs anymore. Or I just don't find them. I'll see to it that we have them on our site. Jeremias Maerki
Re: Completeness of fop-0.90alpha1-src
Jeremias Maerki schrieb: Ok, fixed, along with a few other things. Interesting how many little things you can find that delay a release. :-) With the current build in the branch we are able to create the 3 distributions that I see are necessary: - Source distribution - Binary distribution for JDK 1.3 - Binary distribution for JDK 1.4 and later (containing support for ImageIO) Ok, so we'll release three distributions? (just to make sure) To make a JDK 1.3 distribution build from scratch possible, add: javahome.jdk14 = your jdk 1.4 home path here to your build-local.properties. This enables build the docs while Ant runs under JDK 1.3 because Forrest needs JDK 1.4. I just did a succesfull build with JDK1.3 (nice work Jeremias) I'll do the release builds later today if nobody has objections. Christian
Completeness of fop-0.90alpha1-src
I compared a newly built fop-0.90alpha1-src.zip with my source directory from the repository. The following files are not in the distribution zip file, while I think they should: fop-0.90alpha1/KEYS fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.BCEL.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.NOTICE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.regexp.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.runtime.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/status.xml Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
Re: Completeness of fop-0.90alpha1-src
Ok, fixed, along with a few other things. Interesting how many little things you can find that delay a release. :-) With the current build in the branch we are able to create the 3 distributions that I see are necessary: - Source distribution - Binary distribution for JDK 1.3 - Binary distribution for JDK 1.4 and later (containing support for ImageIO) To make a JDK 1.3 distribution build from scratch possible, add: javahome.jdk14 = your jdk 1.4 home path here to your build-local.properties. This enables build the docs while Ant runs under JDK 1.3 because Forrest needs JDK 1.4. On 18.11.2005 21:49:17 Jeremias Maerki wrote: Thanks, Simon. Good catch! I got that covered. Commit will follow shortly. On 18.11.2005 21:29:37 Simon Pepping wrote: I compared a newly built fop-0.90alpha1-src.zip with my source directory from the repository. The following files are not in the distribution zip file, while I think they should: fop-0.90alpha1/KEYS fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.BCEL.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.NOTICE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.regexp.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.runtime.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/status.xml Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl Jeremias Maerki Jeremias Maerki
