Hi,
Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On 18 Jun 2009, at 20:26, Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi Simon, Vincent,
snip /
I get the feeling that this means that you are planning to relaunch
line breaking while in the page breaking phase.
Yes.
Is that possible?
That’s what I am currently trying to figure
On 19 Jun 2009, at 15:46, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
snip /
Until page breaking has been done you don’t know where the paragraph
will be broken. So you don’t know how far in the element generation
you
must go.
Not true. Until page breaking has been done, we don't know /exactly/
where the
On 19 Jun 2009, at 15:58, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
Just for the sake of completeness:
On 19 Jun 2009, at 15:46, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
snip /
Until page breaking has been done you don’t know where the paragraph
will be broken. So you don’t know how far in the element generation
you
must
On 18 Jun 2009, at 20:26, Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi Simon, Vincent,
snip /
I get the feeling that this means that you are planning to relaunch
line breaking while in the page breaking phase. Is that possible?
What I was wondering too, and why I somehow believe that suspending
line-breaking
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On 11 Jun 2009, at 12:40, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent
snip /
I spent some time looking at the current code and it seems to me that
a hack could be implemented without too many difficulties. It basically
consists in 2 steps:
1. in the Knuth
On 12 Jun 2009, at 13:23, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent
[Me:]
I'm wondering whether it would not be equally feasible to have the
FlowLM check the total height of the block-boxes up to a point
(estimated). Do this after every call to
childLM.getNextKnuthElements().
Then, if the total
Hi All,
While I am making rather good progress on my prototype implementation of
a new layout approach, I am not likely to get any practical results
before some time (a year or more). Meanwhile, users keep bumping into
this Changing IPD issue, which is becoming more and more problematic.
It
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi All,
Hi Vincent,
While I am making rather good progress on my prototype implementation of
a new layout approach, I am not likely to get any practical results
before some time (a year or more). Meanwhile, users keep bumping into
this Changing IPD issue, which is
Hi Chris,
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi All,
Hi Vincent,
snip/
Obviously this is a limited approach. There is likely to be
a (potentially huge) waste of CPU cycles due to the re-creation of Knuth
elements. There may be side effects that I’ve missed so far. But I
On 11 Jun 2009, at 12:40, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent
snip /
I spent some time looking at the current code and it seems to me that
a hack could be implemented without too many difficulties. It
basically
consists in 2 steps:
1. in the Knuth breaking algorithm, when creating a new
10 matches
Mail list logo
