Glen Mazza wrote:
--- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Obviously, I would love to be able to output
alt-design's layout to PDF
without having to build a new interface mechanism.
I think you have that already in the render.Renderer
interface--which defines those methods that a Renderer
--- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SVG Generator can be added to an environment in
> which Java 2D graphics
> are already being produced, using the same
> instructions which are used
> on a Graphics2D object. The SVGGraphics2D object is
> used instead, and
> the same graphical ope
We have it already (to a certain extent)unless I fail to see the
point. We have:
org.apache.fop.svg.PDFDocumentGraphics2D
org.apache.fop.render.ps.PSDocumentGraphics2D
org.apache.fop.render.ps.EPSDocumentGraphics2D
Of course, it will take some more time to mature but the most important
parts a
I use SVN at home and at work. With great success. Command line works
great and is very easy and intuitive. TortoiseSVN (Explorer Plug-In for
Windows) is also quite nice although on some not quite ordinary
operations the thingy seems to do a few things wrong messing up the
local working copy from t
Glen Mazza wrote:
> > The FO input
> > cannot be fully
> > realised with a complete resolution of the properties,
> which in turn
> > relies on layout. (Old argument, I know.)
> >
>
> Well, you should have taken the time to refer people to
> places in the spec [1] which supported your
> posi
"Victor Mote" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12.06.2004 17:35:04:
> It is no longer a concern of mine that FOP has returned to a monolithic
> design, but I think it is a bit unfair to the new developers to imply
that
> the XSL-FO standard mandates such a design, at least with the reasoning
that
>
Jeremias Maerki said:
> I use SVN at home and at work. With great success. Command line works
> great and is very easy and intuitive. TortoiseSVN (Explorer Plug-In for
> Windows) is also quite nice although on some not quite ordinary
> operations the thingy seems to do a few things wrong messing up
Jeremias,
...
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
We have it already (to a certain extent)unless I fail to see the
point. We have:
org.apache.fop.svg.PDFDocumentGraphics2D
org.apache.fop.render.ps.PSDocumentGraphics2D
org.apache.fop.render.ps.EPSDocumentGraphics2D
Of course, it will take some more time to m
Victor Mote wrote:
Glen Mazza wrote:
The FO input
cannot be fully
realised with a complete resolution of the properties,
which in turn
relies on layout. (Old argument, I know.)
Well, you should have taken the time to refer people to
places in the spec [1] which supported your
position-- maybe
Noted. My instinct would be for us to wait about 6-9
months after several other projects move over. If no
problems with them, or at least no major problems,
then I think it would be fine for us to switch
products if other committers would like.
However, this will still require someone SVN-loving
--- Clay Leeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2004, at 1:02 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
>
> > [BTW, you forgot to add Jeremy's birthyear to your
> > bio--no big deal, but you might be getting
> > congratulatory emails/demands for cigars every
> late
> > June! ;)]
> >
> > Glen
>
> As long as t
11 matches
Mail list logo
