version of FOP

Hi, I am involved in the work of converting XML documents to PDF. I tried using current version of FOP. Can you tell me when is the new version of FOP expected which support more XSL formatting objects? Thanks, Tony _ Do You Yahoo

latest version of FOP ?

Hi, I downloaded the cvs version of 30the dec (xml-fop_20011230111947.tar.gz) I could build it successfully, but i am not able to use it. Can anyone tell me abt the latest working version of FOP & from where i can download it ? Thanks, Dhiraj _

need help about adding fonts

l me the reason ? Thanks, Tony _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Choice of a XSL-Fo processor

hi, even i am working on a similar sort of project of making PDF from XSL-FO. I evaluated XEP, FOP & XFC by IBM. XFC is quite good but the file size very large compare to other rendering engines. so it may not be of much help. XEP gives has a windows COM wrapper available but not for free. It sh

RE: source for hz algorithm

n the formatting object tree. Since different people have different speed-quality priorities, the design allows choices for layout rules (once the choices are written, however). Regards, Tony Graham XML Technolog

Re: [Fwd: [xsl] Sun xmlroff XSL Formatter as SourceForge Project]

f. If you are interested in xmlroff, see the SourceForge sites. Regards, Tony Graham XML Technology Center - Dublin Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hamilton House, East Point Business

RE: markers in redesign

then it becomes anarchy. It seems like user I wasn't there when the spec was written, but it seems to me that 'currently-formatted page' presupposes making pages on the fly and doesn't quite describe pages that are unbounded in one or both directions (i.e. where there

Re: markers in redesign

that follows in the area tree any other similarly constrained area that is attached to an identically named fo:marker, using pre-order traversal order. Regards, Tony Graham XML Technology Center - Dubli

unicode-bidi and FOP 2.0?

of FOP 2.0? Regards, Tony Graham Tony Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3

unicode-bidi in FOP 2.0?

of FOP 2.0? Regards, Tony Graham Tony Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3

FOP + Cocoon + xalan

version of xalan? - it would help me immensely Thanks Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Advice please

f differences in the renderer. Can anyone advise me of other options? - Anyone experience with a PDF to printer utility that'll work, perhaps in Java, perhaps that exists for SCO? Or is there a better way of producing a printed page from FOP? many thanks Tony > Tony Phillips > Developme

Table layout

Heading 1 item item Heading 2 item item Total This is working well however I need to do something to make sure that a heading stays with it's entries when the item list is split over multiple pages - I guess it's like using "keep with next" when formatting paragraphs in Word! Any

RE: Table layout

Thanks, still can't seem to get it going - looking at bugzilla report 3044 suggest this isn't working at the moment, anybody succeeded in using keep-together? thanks Tony > -Original Message- > From: Sergei Timofejev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 January 2002

RE: Any real-life business use ?

Currently using it for final stage of invoice production; we generate XML data as part of our legal accounts application. Very impressed so far, no major problems - except keeping with next! Tony > -Original Message- > From: Jozef Chocholacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >

Problem with generated PDF files

temporary (generated) file. However, the copy is fine but removing the generated file fails every time... Has anyone experienced similar problems with access to FOP generated PDF files? If so, any solutions? I'm using FOP 0.20.2-RC1 many thanks Tony > Tony Phillips > Development Manag

RE: Problem with generated PDF files

That sounds reasonable but I'm not running as a servlet, it's a back end server process... perhaps I still need to create a temporary (empty) PDF which I own ? Tony > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 14 February 2

RE: Problem with generated PDF files

Win2K/NT... wonder if it's not going out of scope before I pick up the copy, hmm. Perhaps if I force a garbage collect it will help! Something to try... thanks Tony > -Original Message- > From: James Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 14 February 2002 11:1

RE: Escape sequence characters

> < > -Original Message- > From: Henrik Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 20 February 2002 13:57 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Escape sequence characters > > > Hi, > > Is it possible to put the characters '<' and '>' in my Fo-document? > I does not know how to escape them

Re: Tasks - layout

pt. I just looked in the XSL Recommendation, and Section 7.8.1 notes: XSL uses an abstract model of a font. This model is described in this section and is based on current font technology as exemplified by the OpenType specification [OpenType]. Maybe you also need to look at the OpenType

RE:

Arved Sandstrom wrote at 26 Sep 2002 19:50:01 -0300: > Tony Graham says that should be a Unicode character, or Char. As > in the actual real, encoded thing. Empirical evidence suggests that is the general understanding: grepping the XSL CR test suite shows everybody, FOP included,

Re:

Peter B. West wrote at 28 Sep 2002 00:39:34 +1000: ... > Tony Graham wrote: ... > > Section 5.11, Property Datatypes, trumps the individual property > > definitions, since Section 5.11 defines "the syntax for specifying the > > datatypes usable in property values&qu

Re:

er's code point, although the hexadecimal representation is usually preferable. In XSL terms, "'1'" is a one-character string literal, but while you could claim that it is one character, there's no XSL conversion from a string to a character, so shoul

Re:

Peter B. West wrote at 30 Sep 2002 13:28:18 +1000: > Tony Graham wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 27 Sep 2002 16:44:32 -0300: ... > > > That means "-", "#12235" , etc are characters, while "'1'" is not. > > &

Sun XSL Formatter

. The formatter is awaiting final approval before the code can be made public source. An announcement will be made on xsl-list, www-xsl-fo, and XSL-FO@YahooGroups once the code is available. Regards, Tony Graham XML Technology Center Sun Microsystems Ireland

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

Arved Sandstrom wrote at 14 Dec 2002 15:05:05 -0400: > No bitterness at all, actually, Peter. It takes a bit of wind out of my > sails, sure, since xmlroff is so similar to the project that Eric Bischoff > and myself were working on. Tony has certainly been aware of that for quite

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

Patrick Dean Rusk wrote at 17 Dec 2002 17:40:11 -0500: > Perhaps Tony knows better, but I have a potentially plausible explanation > for Sun being "secretive" about their project: it may not initially have > been intended for eventual open source development. In other