Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
> Victor, IIC, Jeremias' concern is about the PDF lib in HEAD
> containing substantial improvements over the code in the
> maintenance branch. One aspect that springs to mind is WRT
> encryption support --as I recall, maintenance still had some
> problems with this,
> -Original Message-
> From: Victor Mote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
Hi guys,
(Just catching up on the postings of the last few days, this one caught my
eye...)
> > although I'm still a bit concerned that you based your PDF
> > part on the maintenance branch co
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Ah, now I'm starting to see where this is going. I think this
> something extremely difficult to do. To a certain degree it
Agreed.
> sounds like my ideas/plans for the XML Graphics project,
> namely to separate certain peripheral components (fonts, PDF
> lib, Graphi
Ah, now I'm starting to see where this is going. I think this something
extremely difficult to do. To a certain degree it sounds like my
ideas/plans for the XML Graphics project, namely to separate certain
peripheral components (fonts, PDF lib, Graphics2D implementations etc.)
from FOP so efforts c
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> from the website I don't quite get the scope of the project.
> That might have to be made clearer. Anyway, I didn't want to
Yes, just as soon as it is totally clear to me :-) Right now, it boils down
to "here are some things that I think could/should be shared, can anyb
Victor,
from the website I don't quite get the scope of the project. That might
have to be made clearer. Anyway, I didn't want to talk about it just yet,
because it's not ready, but recently I started writing a JAXP-like API
for XSL-FO processors (I called in JAFOP for now). It basically
implement
Victor Mote wrote:
Finn Bock wrote:
Do you mean that the 3 different processors should ideally
report the same validation errors in the same manner? That
can only happen after someone standardize a SAFO API (Simple
API for FO parsing). Until then all implementation will throw
different excepti
I am impressed by your seemingly boundless dedication
to XSL and its related fields.
Glen
--- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I actually toyed with this idea about two weeks ago.
> IIRC, the SAFO name is
> already taken, but at the time I registered the
> axsl.org domain, and I
> final
