"Joerg Flotho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>only if you use somewhat esoteric characters (for
> >>>middle-european cultures) like special mathematical symbols.
> The copyright-symbol (x00A9) is interpreted correctly, I think
> because it's lower than 256.
> Second example: a left-arrow (x2190)
Thank you!
I checked your hints and answer after the respective positions.
>>>-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
>>>Von: Joerg Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2002 12:42
>>>An: FOP List
>>>Betreff: Re: Unic
Joerg Flotho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We have different versions of interpretations regarding unicode:
[...]
> (hexadecimal or decimal seems to make no difference).
That's by design :-)
> After passing XALAN some signs were interpreted
> wrong.(viewing in IE 5.0 as filename.fo)
[...]
I suppose some
Correctly displayed signs are those whose decimal-value is lower than
256.
Whatever my encoding type is (UTF-8 or UTF-16 or none)in the xml.file
and xsl.file, the IE 5.0 shows UTF-8 viewing the filename.fo.
Do I have to use Arial in any case in the xsl.stylesheet?
Jörg Flotho
What is the enc
: Unicode interpretation
What is the encoding type for your xml document?
Michael Akerman
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Information Services
(501) 575-5870
What is the encoding type for your xml document?
Michael Akerman
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Information Services
(501) 575-5870 University of Arkansas
h
We have different versions of interpretations regarding unicode:
In the xml-file we use unicode (hexadecimal or decimal seems to make no
difference). After passing XALAN some signs were interpreted
wrong.(viewing in IE 5.0 as filename.fo)
And after passing the FO-process in Tomcat (FOP 20.1) the
