Re: keep-together.within-page - does it work ?

2002-05-29 Thread IvanLatysh
Hello, Jeremias! You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 29 May 2002 19:16:45 +0200: JM> Well, I have a big table with 4 columns. Each part of the details of JM> the invoice is in its own table-row. But Joe's right. See the JM> attached testcase. If you build a PDF from it you'll see that JM

Re: keep-together.within-page - does it work ?

2002-05-29 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Well, I have a big table with 4 columns. Each part of the details of the invoice is in its own table-row. But Joe's right. See the attached testcase. If you build a PDF from it you'll see that keep-with-next has an effect on page one but not on consecutive pages. Seem like I have to revisit my sty

Re: keep-together.within-page - does it work ?

2002-05-29 Thread IvanLatysh
Hello, Jeremias! You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 29 May 2002 18:19:39 +0200: JM> Thanks for speaking up. I didn't follow this topic so I missed that. JM> Seems like I've been lucky only having two-page-documents where I JM> used keeps. And how did you get it working :-) --- Yours si

Re: keep-together.within-page - does it work ?

2002-05-29 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks for speaking up. I didn't follow this topic so I missed that. Seems like I've been lucky only having two-page-documents where I used keeps. > If you're past page 1, I think the "keeps" are turned off. > > There was a big problem with running into an infinite loop when > the total layout a

Re: keep-together.within-page - does it work ?

2002-05-29 Thread joseph . aloysius . gilvary
The keep-with stuff is only implemented for tables. And I'm not sure that all of it really is. Try wrapping your block in simple tables and specify the keep-with attributes on the table-row. I've sucessfully used keep-with-previous="always" and keep-with-next="always" on table-row. Good luck.

Re: keep-together.within-page - does it work ?

2002-05-29 Thread IvanLatysh
Hello, Jeremias! You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 29 May 2002 17:22:36 +0200: JM> The keep-with stuff is only implemented for tables. And I'm not sure JM> that all of it really is. Try wrapping your block in simple tables JM> and specify the keep-with attributes on the table-row. I've

Re: keep-together.within-page - does it work ?

2002-05-29 Thread Jeremias Maerki
The keep-with stuff is only implemented for tables. And I'm not sure that all of it really is. Try wrapping your block in simple tables and specify the keep-with attributes on the table-row. I've sucessfully used keep-with-previous="always" and keep-with-next="always" on table-row. Good luck. > I

keep-together.within-page - does it work ?

2002-05-29 Thread IvanLatysh
Hi All I have template where I have fo:block, inside there are 4 tables and other blocks. And I need to keep all this on the same page. Af cource I have read documentation and there are some mentions about "keep-together.within-page" I did: Anyway block is braking, I did play around and didn't f