Re: Apache FOP on .NET

2005-11-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Dalibor Good thing you're still lurking! :-) On 21.11.2005 23:48:37 Dalibor Topic wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:29:18AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Hi gang, > > > > as you know we've have several inquiries in the past about compiling FOP > > with GNU Classpath for use in VMs such

Re: Apache FOP on .NET

2005-11-22 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I think having the opportunity to provide a .NET version of FOP would widen the number of potential users considerably especially since to my knowledge there's no usable open source .NET FO implementation out there. Depending on the license situation (IKVM is BSD but GNU C

Re: Apache FOP on .NET

2005-11-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Oleg, I see you're still a lurker. :-) J#: I don't know. It looks like you need a Visual Studio .NET license which I don't have. Was this what nfop was done with? I didn't look. C#: I don't have time to help with such an endeavour in the near future. That's a huge task. And the Java version ta

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] - footnotes within table-cell get lost

2005-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37589] New: - iText, Bookmarks and Document Info

2005-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37589] - iText, Bookmarks and Document Info

2005-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Apache FOP on .NET

2005-11-22 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Jeremias Maerki wrote: J#: I don't know. It looks like you need a Visual Studio .NET license which I don't have. Was this what nfop was done with? I didn't look. afair J# command line compiler is a part of .NET SDK. I'll check it out anyway. The main problem I think is that J# supports only J

Re: Apache FOP on .NET

2005-11-22 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:51:40AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > I see you're still a lurker. :-) > > J#: I don't know. It looks like you need a Visual Studio .NET license > which I don't have. Was this what nfop was done with? I didn't look. > C#: I don't have time to help with su

Re: Apache FOP on .NET

2005-11-22 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:12:05AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Hi Dalibor > > Good thing you're still lurking! :-) > Well, FOP is very interesting for me in terms of having a free DocBook toolchain on free runtimes that's well maintained. If you are around at FOSDEM, it'd be great to have a

Re: Illegal property values

2005-11-22 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Nov 16, 2005, at 19:24, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Nov 16, 2005, at 11:51, Luca Furini wrote: There are other properties with a "validity range" and a fallback value: column-count, initial-page-number, column-number, number- columns-repeated, number-columns-spanned, number-rows-spanne

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37589] - iText, Bookmarks and Document Info

2005-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Release

2005-11-22 Thread Simon Pepping
OK, except that I could not verify your signature: >gpg --verify fop-0.90alpha1-src.tar.gz.asc fop-0.90alpha1-src.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Mon 21 Nov 2005 23:05:36 CET using DSA key ID 8408F755 gpg: BAD signature from "Christian Geisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" >gpg --verify fop-0.90alpha1-bin-jdk1

Re: Release

2005-11-22 Thread Christian Geisert
Simon Pepping schrieb: OK, except that I could not verify your signature: Yes, I screwed it up - fixed now. Thanks for checking Christian

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache FOP 0.90 alpha 1 released

2005-11-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
The Apache FOP team is excited to announce the release of Apache FOP 0.90 alpha 1, the first preview release after over three years of redesign and after two and a half years without a new release. Apache FOP is the Apache Software Foundation's XSL-FO implementation written in Java with support fo