Bug report for Fop [2006/10/08]

2006-10-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: PATCH for Arabic/Persian Text, and Bidi-override!

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 08.10.2006 23:01:13 Kia Teymourian wrote: Hi all, I am working on a patch for Arabic/Persian Text decoration and Implementation of Bidi Algorithm. I have some questions about it and writing to you to ask for your assistance, could you please answer my questions! 1. Can I use

Re: Including an sRGB color profile?

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Sorry for the delay, Peter. On 05.10.2006 13:40:33 Peter Coppens wrote: So i have started to look into this today. Starting at the beginning, I am looking into 1. Implementation of the rgb-icc() function. I have added the necessary code to get the function and its arguments parsed

Re: Including an sRGB color profile?

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 06.10.2006 15:58:34 Peter Coppens wrote: Hello again, Today I played with the FOP PDF package and I seem to making good progress. That means that besides (1) from below I think I can move forward with (3) as well. The idea is to have rgb-icc support for pdf output. All other

Re: Including an sRGB color profile?

2006-10-09 Thread Peter Coppens
Do you really have to extend the Color class? I think it already provides methods to access the fallback sRGB value which is actually what the FO spec wants (getRed(), getGreen(), getBlue()). Not sureall pretty new for me, but would the getRGB() functions not return the profile based

Re: Including an sRGB color profile?

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Uh yeah, right. I didn't think about that. No way around subclassing Color then. On 09.10.2006 09:54:31 Peter Coppens wrote: Do you really have to extend the Color class? I think it already provides methods to access the fallback sRGB value which is actually what the FO spec wants

XSL 1.1 is in Proposed Recommendation phase

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Subject says it all. From the W3C news: 2006-10-06: W3C is pleased to announce the advancement of Extensible Stylesheet Language (XSL) Version 1.1 to Proposed Recommendation. Version 1.1 updates and enhances the XSL 1.0 Recommendation for change marks, indexes, multiple flows, and bookmarks, and

XSL-FO 2.0 workshop in Heidelberg next week

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
If anyone has any requirements for XSL-FO 2.0 which I should bring up at the workshop in Heidelberg next week, please let me know. Deadline 2006-10-16 so I have time to prepare. Luca, are you going, too? How do you travel? Jeremias Maerki

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break

2006-10-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break

2006-10-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Including an sRGB color profile?

2006-10-09 Thread Peter Coppens
What is not clear to me is how I can get hold of the color-profile information (as in fo:declarations fo:color-profile color-profile-name= src=.../ ? /fo:declarations ) Hmm, yes, I guess that will also have to be implemented. Take a look at

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break

2006-10-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40655] - [PATCH] Failure in PNGRenderer when output file name is missing an extension

2006-10-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40655. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Including an sRGB color profile?

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 09.10.2006 11:49:13 Peter Coppens wrote: What is not clear to me is how I can get hold of the color-profile information (as in fo:declarations fo:color-profile color-profile-name= src=.../ ? /fo:declarations ) Hmm, yes, I guess that will also have to be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40556] - [PATCH] IndexOutOfBoundsException at ListItemLayoutManager.java:495

2006-10-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40556. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break

2006-10-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Including an sRGB color profile?

2006-10-09 Thread Peter Coppens
I don't think this will go without changing some method signatures. Given that not in every context (see AreaTreeParser example above) you have the FO tree available. So it may make sense to define a ColorContext interface which allows access to the available color profiles for the document.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40442] - [PATCH] percent length not working in font-size for rtf output

2006-10-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40442. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Including an sRGB color profile?

2006-10-09 Thread Peter Coppens
On second thought, having the conversion based on the profile might be the right thing to do after all. Either the renderer knows how to deal with color profiles and will do the necessary, or it does not in which case it will ask the color for its rgb values. The profile based converted values

Re: Including an sRGB color profile?

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hey, we're all constantly learning here and I didn't find anything confusing or unclear in your questions. From what I can read between the lines you're well on your way in the right direction. However, I must excuse myself until Wednesday before I can continue to help you since it's already very

Re: XSL-FO 2.0 workshop in Heidelberg next week

2006-10-09 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: If anyone has any requirements for XSL-FO 2.0 which I should bring up at the workshop in Heidelberg next week, please let me know. Some rough ideas, unpolished, and without even having had a look at both 1.1 and the current 2.0 proposals: - Generalize headers/footers for

Re: XSL-FO 2.0 workshop in Heidelberg next week

2006-10-09 Thread Nicol Bolas
A few. I do think, when proposing these things, it is important to remember that XSL-FO is not intended to implement all possible typsetting operations, that it still needs to remain easily implementable. I guess one question I have is how different should XSL-FO 2.0 be from 1.1? Should it just

Re: PATCH for Arabic/Persian Text, and Bidi-override!

2006-10-09 Thread Manuel Mall
On Monday 09 October 2006 05:01, Kia Teymourian wrote: Hi all, Hi, Jeremias already responded to you and my comments go in the same direction. Firstly, its great that you want to look at this aspect. I did investigate support for UAX#14 Unicode compliant line breaking over a year ago. I