[jira] [Updated] (FOP-2360) Can no longer get -awt (FOP viewer) to work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] nick.heyworth updated FOP-2360: --- Attachment: tmp.fo > Can no longer get -awt (FOP viewer) to work >

[jira] [Created] (FOP-2360) Can no longer get -awt (FOP viewer) to work

nick.heyworth created FOP-2360: -- Summary: Can no longer get -awt (FOP viewer) to work Key: FOP-2360 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2360 Project: Fop Issue Type: Bug Com

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2025) sRGB Color Space Profile is subject to 3rd party copyright

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13947834#comment-13947834 ] Emmanuel Bourg commented on FOP-2025: - The OpenICC project on SourceForge has a sRGB.icc

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2157) Deadlock in CompareUtil class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13947874#comment-13947874 ] Morten Knudsen commented on FOP-2157: - Could the solution be implement some ordering in

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2157) Deadlock in CompareUtil class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13947949#comment-13947949 ] Alexios Giotis commented on FOP-2157: - I think the suggestion above would fix it, since

DITA-OT and FOP

The DITA-OT (DITA Open Toolkit) (http://www.ditaopentoolkit.org/) is an open source project that depends on FOP. It takes DITA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_Information_Typing_Architecture) XML input and produces a number of different document types. One of the main output types is PDF an

[VOTE] Simon Steiner for committer

Hi Team, I'd like to propose Simon Steiner for committership on the FOP project. Simon has been submitting patches since late 2012, and has now submitted 33 in total. 23 of these have been applied to the codebase. Votes to general@ only please, they won't count on fop-dev. The vote will run

Re: DITA-OT and FOP

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote: > The DITA-OT (DITA Open Toolkit) (http://www.ditaopentoolkit.org/) is an > open source project that depends on FOP. > It takes DITA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_Information_Typing_ > Architecture) XML input and produces a number of diff

Re: [VOTE] Simon Steiner for committer

+1 On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Chris Bowditch wrote: > Hi Team, > > I'd like to propose Simon Steiner for committership on the FOP project. > Simon has been submitting patches since late 2012, and has now submitted 33 > in total. 23 of these have been applied to the codebase. > > Votes to g

Re: DITA-OT and FOP

On 26/03/2014 11:46 AM, Glenn Adams wrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Ron Wheeler > wrote: The DITA-OT (DITA Open Toolkit) (http://www.ditaopentoolkit.org/) is an open source project that depends on FOP. It takes DITA (http://en.wi

Re: [VOTE] Simon Steiner for committer

Hi, +1 2014-03-26 16:37 GMT+01:00 Chris Bowditch : > Hi Team, > > I'd like to propose Simon Steiner for committership on the FOP project. > Simon has been submitting patches since late 2012, and has now submitted 33 > in total. 23 of these have been applied to the codebase. > > Votes to general@

Re: DITA-OT and FOP

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Ron Wheeler < rwhee...@artifact-software.com> wrote: > On 26/03/2014 11:46 AM, Glenn Adams wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Ron Wheeler < > rwhee...@artifact-software.com> wrote: > >> The DITA-OT (DITA Open Toolkit) (http://www.ditaopentoolkit.org/

Re: DITA-OT and FOP

On 26/03/2014 12:25 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Ron Wheeler > wrote: On 26/03/2014 11:46 AM, Glenn Adams wrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Ron Wheeler mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com>> wrote:

Re: DITA-OT and FOP

Although I don’t get a vote, I completely agree with Glenn that DITA integration into FOP is completely inappropriate. I also challenge Ron’s assertion that DITA users are the biggest users of FOP; DocBook is way up there too, along with an uncountable number of other document types. If the DITA

Re: DITA-OT and FOP

On 26/03/2014 2:14 PM, Christopher R. Maden wrote: Although I don’t get a vote, I completely agree with Glenn that DITA integration into FOP is completely inappropriate. Thanks for taking the time to comment. I appreciate the input - voting or not. I also challenge Ron’s assertion that DITA use

RE: DITA-OT and FOP

On 2014-03-26 Christopher R. Maden wrote: > Although I don’t get a vote, I completely agree with Glenn that DITA > integration into FOP is completely inappropriate. +1 FOP consumes standardized XSL-FO. DITA-OT should produce standardized XSL-FO. Period ;-) >From my POV it has nothing to do with

Re: DITA-OT and FOP

On 26/03/2014 2:59 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: On 2014-03-26 Christopher R. Maden wrote: Although I don’t get a vote, I completely agree with Glenn that DITA integration into FOP is completely inappropriate. +1 FOP consumes standardized XSL-FO. DITA-OT should produce standardized XSL-FO. Period ;

Re: DITA-OT and FOP

Since the FO in FOP is the same as the FO in XSL-FO and think there will be consensus that FOP will only ingest FO natively. That is my opinion too. Now, in principle, I have no objection in having a new sub-project under the XMLGraphics umbrella that will convert DITA input to FO output, sp

Re: DITA-OT and FOP

On 26/03/2014 6:34 PM, Luis Bernardo wrote: Since the FO in FOP is the same as the FO in XSL-FO and think there will be consensus that FOP will only ingest FO natively. That is my opinion too. DITA-OT currently produces valid FO and there is no desire to change this unless FOP requires th