Hi Anton,
That's a pretty vague question. Can you describe the issue you are
facing? It's also usual to share the XSL-Fo that causes the problem. We
will then have some chance to advise on possible solutions
Thanks,
Chris
On 07/06/2019 14:01, Plotnikau, Anton wrote:
>
> HI Team,
>
> We faced
Hi Glenn,
Thanks again your details explanation and help to create a bug report.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Bruce
2011/9/19 Glenn Adams
> I mean FOP itself needs to be modified to properly handle UTF-16 encoded
> (i.e., Java string encoded) surrogate pair encodings of non-BMP Unicode code
I mean FOP itself needs to be modified to properly handle UTF-16 encoded
(i.e., Java string encoded) surrogate pair encodings of non-BMP Unicode code
points.
I have been doing such modifications in part in my recent work to add
complex script support (in which I did code for handling non-BMP
codep
On 07/06/2011 09:49, Ankur wrote:
I am Ankur,need to generate Report in Russian Language.
Hi Ankur,
fop.xconf as:
XSL as:
Russian:
А Б В Г
but still the PostScript file is not showing these Russian
On 04 Jun 2009, at 14:53, Ben Wuest wrote:
Hi Ben
I agree that this should happen behind the scenes without the user
having to specify anything. I had to perform this work-around the
way I
did because of our current time constraints. Hopefully, this can lead
to something else. Unfortunatel
easier to modify the RTF
rendering because it does not use the Page Breaking Algorithm.
Regards,
Ben.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:andreas.delme...@telenet.be]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:35 AM
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache FOP 0.95
On 04 Jun 2009, at 14:11, Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi Ben, Simon & Vincent,
Indeed, it is a horrible hack with regard to the meaning of a
page-sequence. But it is an interesting solution to the problem of
influencing FOP's page breaking algorithm.
The very same thoughts over here. A really int
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> It is likely to interest other users who run into similar memory issues,
> and the good thing of having made it against the 0.95 release is that it
> won???t be made obsolete by further changes in the code.
>
> We are not going t
.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:vhenneb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:35 AM
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Cc: Chris Fanjoy; Jody Brownell; Glen Campbell
Subject: Re: Apache FOP 0.95 Patch
Hi Ben,
Thank you very much for your interest in FOP and
Hi Ben,
Thank you very much for your interest in FOP and your contribution. I’ve
opened a Bugzilla issue containing your patch so that it can easily be
referred to:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47314
It is likely to interest other users who run into similar memory issues,
an
Ok, I'll try to see if I can find a little time to help you.
I would like to upgrade FOP in the pdf plugin for maven.
Thanks
Arnaud
On 1/9/07, Simon Pepping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arnaud,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:31:13AM +0100, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Can you deploy you
Simon Pepping wrote:
* Support for the rgb-icc() function and for a proprietary cmyk()
function (for device CMYK colors only through the PDF renderer so
far).
The table at http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html still
lists rgb-icc as a No. You should update this when you get a
Arnaud,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:31:13AM +0100, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Can you deploy your jars on a maven repository please.
> For example :
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m1-ibiblio-rsync-repository/fop/jars/
Please ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] There has been talk
about Maven.
On 22.11.2005 15:39:24 Dalibor Topic wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:12:05AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Hi Dalibor
> >
> > Good thing you're still lurking! :-)
> >
>
> Well, FOP is very interesting for me in terms of having a free DocBook
> toolchain on free runtimes that's well main
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:12:05AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hi Dalibor
>
> Good thing you're still lurking! :-)
>
Well, FOP is very interesting for me in terms of having a free DocBook
toolchain on free runtimes that's well maintained. If you are around at
FOSDEM, it'd be great to have a
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:51:40AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> I see you're still a lurker. :-)
>
> J#: I don't know. It looks like you need a Visual Studio .NET license
> which I don't have. Was this what nfop was done with? I didn't look.
> C#: I don't have time to help with su
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
J#: I don't know. It looks like you need a Visual Studio .NET license
which I don't have. Was this what nfop was done with? I didn't look.
afair J# command line compiler is a part of .NET SDK. I'll check it out
anyway. The main problem I think is that J# supports only J
Hi Oleg,
I see you're still a lurker. :-)
J#: I don't know. It looks like you need a Visual Studio .NET license
which I don't have. Was this what nfop was done with? I didn't look.
C#: I don't have time to help with such an endeavour in the near future.
That's a huge task. And the Java version ta
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I think having the opportunity to provide a .NET version of FOP would
widen the number of potential users considerably especially since
to my knowledge there's no usable open source .NET FO implementation out
there. Depending on the license situation (IKVM is BSD but GNU C
Hi Dalibor
Good thing you're still lurking! :-)
On 21.11.2005 23:48:37 Dalibor Topic wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:29:18AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Hi gang,
> >
> > as you know we've have several inquiries in the past about compiling FOP
> > with GNU Classpath for use in VMs such
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:29:18AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> as you know we've have several inquiries in the past about compiling FOP
> with GNU Classpath for use in VMs such as Kaffe or natively on Unixes
> (using GCC/GCJ) and about running Apache FOP under .NET. I've done som
We appreciate your efforts! Thank you, Clay!
On 23.06.2005 16:41:44 The Web Maestro wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2005, at 12:10 AM, Christian Geisert wrote:
> > Just copy the files to /www/www.apache.org/dist/xml/fop/
> > (we should probably put them under SVN somewhere)
> >
> > Sorry no more time, going t
On Jun 23, 2005, at 12:10 AM, Christian Geisert wrote:
Just copy the files to /www/www.apache.org/dist/xml/fop/
(we should probably put them under SVN somewhere)
Sorry no more time, going to for LinuxTag now ..
Christian
heh... have fun?
I've uploaded the file. I don't see it anywhere yet, b
23 matches
Mail list logo
