I don't have time to participate in this thread at the moment, but I want to
mention that writing mode should have no impact on any CTM produced by a
reference orientation. Writing mode is solely used to
(1) resolve the absolute inline and block progression directions (prior to
any rotation of ref
On 09/03/11 17:34, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 09 Mar 2011, at 00:04, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>>> The before-edge of the region-viewport-area (V)
>>
>> This is ambiguous. Of which rectangle of the region-viewport-area? The
>> edge is not the same whether we are talking about the
>> border/paddin
On 09 Mar 2011, at 00:04, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Why?? Where in the spec is that interpretation of the term
> ‘reference-area’ given?
>
> OTOH, in Section 4.2.2: “An area for which [the is-reference-area] trait
> is true is called a reference-area.”
Arrghh, too liberal interpretation from
On 08/03/11 21:14, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2011, at 21:26, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
>>
>> A viewport-area /is/ a reference-area. See section 4.2.2.
>
> I think we're almost there.
>
> From that section:
>
> "A common construct is a viewport/reference pair. This is a viewport-area
On 08 Mar 2011, at 21:26, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
> A viewport-area /is/ a reference-area. See section 4.2.2.
I think we're almost there.
From that section:
"A common construct is a viewport/reference pair. This is a viewport-area V and
a block-area reference-area R, where R is the sole c
On 07/03/11 23:57, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
>
> On 04 Mar 2011, at 12:25, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
>> On 03/03/11 20:18, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
>>>
>>> Let's assume that this refers to the default/normal situation. After all,
>>> we are quoting the _general_ fo:region-before definition (= wher
On 04 Mar 2011, at 12:25, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> On 03/03/11 20:18, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
>>
>> Let's assume that this refers to the default/normal situation. After all, we
>> are quoting the _general_ fo:region-before definition (= where no deviating
>> reference-orientation has been sp
On 03/03/11 20:18, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 03 Mar 2011, at 13:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
>>> Unless ... the viewport is where the actual rotation takes place.
>>> IIC, the region-viewport's before-edge is still parallel to the
>>> page-reference-area's before edge. The before-edge of th
On 03 Mar 2011, at 21:18, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
>
> So, specifying reference-orientation="90" on the region rotates its
> reference-area by 90 degrees from the page-reference-area.
Correction: this is still the 1.0-way of looking at it.
In 1.1, this would have to be something along the line
On 03 Mar 2011, at 13:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Unless ... the viewport is where the actual rotation takes place.
>> IIC, the region-viewport's before-edge is still parallel to the
>> page-reference-area's before edge. The before-edge of the
>> region-reference-area, however, is the one t
On 03 Mar 2011, at 13:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>>
>>> Unless, of course, I have completely missed the point, which might well
>>> be the case.
>>
>> Only forgot to check the history/legacy --as did I when I filed bug #46826
>
> Frankly, I’m not willing to look at the XSL-FO 1.0 Recommendati
On 02/03/11 21:30, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 02 Mar 2011, at 21:30, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> I came across a very interesting section of the XSL-FO 1.1
>> Recommendation. This is the description of the
>> from-page-master-region
>> function in section 5.10.4, “Property Value Functions”.
>
On 02 Mar 2011, at 22:30, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
>
> The implementation of the (from-page-master) function itself seems like a
> simple thing to add. Even someone who doesn't know FOP's codebase should be
> able to figure it out in no more than one day... (not taking into account
> preparat
On 02 Mar 2011, at 21:30, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
To answer the final question first:
> Any thoughts?
Yep! Well, not many, but /some/...
BTW: there is also Bugzilla 46826, which is related to reference-orientation.
It is currently treated as an inherited property, which is non-compliant and
l
aka “The Recommendation Strikes Back”
I came across a very interesting section of the XSL-FO 1.1
Recommendation. This is the description of the from-page-master-region
function in section 5.10.4, “Property Value Functions”. This function
can be used to determine the computed value of the “writing-
15 matches
Mail list logo
