Re: Do Fop have problems with keep-with-...?

> Steinar Bang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> [snip!] If you are generating FO from DocBook, this will probably >> be hard, or harder. You can try to fiddle with the docbook style >> sheets to achieve this effect. > Some workaround around those lines, is w

Re: Do Fop have problems with keep-with-...?

> "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [snip!] If you are generating FO from DocBook, this will probably be > hard, or harder. You can try to fiddle with the docbook style sheets > to achieve this effect. Some workaround around those lines, is what I will try tomorrow. I won't fiddle with

Re: Do Fop have problems with keep-with-...?

Steinar Bang wrote: Does Fop still have a problem with keep-with-*? Yes, and this will persist for some time. I have a problem with the title of a section, in a DocBook XML article, not "sticking with" the rest of the section, when a page break is inserted. The keep-with-* properties work on table

Do Fop have problems with keep-with-...?

Platform: Intel PIII, debian testing, Blackdown Java SDK 1.3.1, Saxon 6.4.4, DocBook XML 4.1.2, DocBook-XSL 1.48, Fop-0.20.3rc Does Fop still have a problem with keep-with-*? Searches on the net seem to indicate that this was the case as late as February this year: