RE: Keeping it together

2002-02-19 Thread Scott Moore
You can get the debugging output back by asking for DEBUG output in the logging code. Scott -Original Message- From: Savino, Matt C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:46 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Keeping it together Supposedly in .20

RE: Keeping it together

2002-02-19 Thread Savino, Matt C
y). I posted on fop-dev to ask if there was any way around these issues but no one replied. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: Jozef Chocholacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Keeping it together &

AW: Keeping it together

2002-02-19 Thread Sam Prokop
Von: Lars Karschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 18. Februar 2002 13:48 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Keeping it together > > > Hi, > > is there anyone out there who's familiar with keep-properties? > > My problem are rows of a table, whic

Re: Keeping it together

2002-02-19 Thread Jozef Chocholacek
Lars Karschen wrote: > ... I tried to connect them via keep-with-next.within-page="always", but there's no change on the output, maybe i overlooked something, since i'm not sure if i understand the definition on the W3C-Page ;) You understand it good, but FOP has no or just a symbolic implementa

Keeping it together

2002-02-18 Thread Lars Karschen
Hi, is there anyone out there who's familiar with keep-properties? My problem are rows of a table, which should all stay on one page, since their content is linked to each other (one article with all it's descriptive attributes for example) The rows are not always the same number, because sometim