Re: [fossil-users] Fossil ui File [check-ins using] bug

The equivalent to finfo command is not the “checking using” link. You should click on the file name just before the comment which will give you this: https://jsish.org/fossil/jsi/finfo?name=lib/Jsi_Debug.jsi=a7810a6e571b0823 Regards — Martin G. Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 18:28, Peter MacDonald

Re: [fossil-users] "fossil gdiff" doesn't launch WinMerge; fossil.exe with autocompletion?

Le sam. 4 août 2018 à 11:17, Stephan Beal a écrit : > If it was that common we would have realized the problem sooner ;). > > The problem with generating output for "no changes" is that we potentially > break any automation which relies on an empty diff to mean "no changes". > That is what

Re: [fossil-users] "fossil gdiff" doesn't launch WinMerge; fossil.exe with autocompletion?

On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 04:25:28PM +0200, Gilles wrote: > On 04/08/2018 15:51, Gilles wrote: > >d:\Temp>fossil gdiff test.html > > > >Nothing. > > I don't know if it means anything, but incidently, "fossil diff" doesn't > return anything either: > > d:\Temp>fossil diff test.html > >

Re: [fossil-users] "fossil gdiff" doesn't launch WinMerge; fossil.exe with autocompletion?

On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 01:16:29PM +0200, Gilles wrote: > Hello, > > I have a couple of questions: > > 1. Although fossil.exe is configured with… > > fossil settings > gdiff-command    (global) "C:\Program > Files\WinMerge\WinMergeU.exe" > > … nothing happens when I run "fossil gdiff

Re: [fossil-users] Can't believe --branchcolor would be platform-specific

On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 02:39:52PM +0200, Francois Vogel wrote: > Many thanks for your answers. I'm always impressed how members of this > list are helpful and reply quickly. Bienvenue -- Martin G. ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Can't believe --branchcolor would be platform-specific

My guess is that on a bash shell, # is the symbol for comments. Try to put it in double quotes; e.g.:—branchcolor "#f0a0a0" Regards, (Sorry for top posting and brevity, I’m on mobile) — Martin G. Le sam. 7 juill. 2018 à 07:30, Francois Vogel a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'm experiencing the

Re: [fossil-users] build without zlib doesn't works anymore (using --with-miniz)

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 03:41:58PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: > Hi, > > I use to be able to build fossil for some embedded arm linux without the > need to have zlib available on my cross-compiler toolchain by using > ./configure --with-miniz. > > This doesn't works any

[fossil-users] build without zlib doesn't works anymore (using --with-miniz)

Hi, I use to be able to build fossil for some embedded arm linux without the need to have zlib available on my cross-compiler toolchain by using ./configure --with-miniz. This doesn't works anymore because it seems that now, shell.c include zlib.h and links against zlib. Thanks, -- Martin G.

Re: [fossil-users] smtp.c build failures

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:26:42PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/28/18, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > > > To use the ns_* function, you needs to install libbind from packages: > > pkg_add -r libbind. > > > > I'm thinking I will probably end up having to write m

Re: [fossil-users] smtp.c build failures

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:58:55AM -0700, jungle Boogie wrote: > On 28 June 2018 at 11:42, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 6/28/18, jungle Boogie wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I know it's still very early on to make use of the new smtp logic, but > >> I thought I'd report these issues. Is anyone else

Re: [fossil-users] Change textarea for textnotes to placeholder text

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 06:26:06AM -0700, Zack Scholl wrote: > > I made this change in a forked copy of fossil (simply change are line 544 > of event.src to add the placeholder [2] and delete "Insert new content > here..." from line 474) ... > > [2]: >

Re: [fossil-users] Mailing list shutting down...

Just brainstorming here: May be a kind of "mailing list" and/or "forum" feature could be added to Fossil itself ? Fossil would become even more an alternative to github+git. Of course this would be a long-term work. This is just a random thought, it might be a bad idea, I’m not sure what to

Re: [fossil-users] Amendments don't always survive rebuilds

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 02:24:48PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/9/18, Andy Goth wrote: > > Some amendments don't consistently survive rebuilds and syncs. I've > > noticed this with date changes and reparenting. Possibly it affects > > other types of amendments as well, but those are the

Re: [fossil-users] How to rename a directory

Fossil mv *can* take a directory as argument and it will move every files inside recursively. But the semantic is not exactly like the unix "mv" command and it doesn't works with the "--hard" option (probably a bug). Example, if you have a directory "dir" and want to move it inside a new

Re: [fossil-users] configuration fossil generic to all fossil checkouts

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 06:02:47PM +, Agrawal, Ritika wrote: > Is there a settings file similar to .gitconfig in git that can be > stored in user's home directory and overrides settings for all the > fossil clones performed by the user. > The global settings are saved in ~/.fossil, which is

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix an SQLite warning on the /tagtimeline page?

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:02:47PM +0200, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: > Hi, > > how to fix an SQLite warning on the /tagtimeline page? > > On all my publicly available repositories I have such error on that page: > SQLITE_WARNING: automatic index on tagxref(tagtype) > I have the exact same

Re: [fossil-users] Strange error. How to workaround.

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 08:13:54PM +0200, John Found wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:03:13 -0500 > Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > On 2/1/18, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I could reproduce it. I didn't have much ti

Re: [fossil-users] Strange error. How to workaround.

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:03:13PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 2/1/18, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I could reproduce it. I didn't have much time to investigate it for now > > but I have attached a simple shell script that reproduce the proble

Re: [fossil-users] Strange error. How to workaround.

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 07:00:31AM +0200, John Found wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 20:19:06 -0500 > Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On 1/31/18, John Found wrote: > > > > > > "fossil chan" for these two files display: > > > > > > SYMLINKactivity0.tpl > > >

[fossil-users] Wrong link in Download page

Hi, I've noticed a typo in one of the link in the download page. The date link (2017-11-03), following "Version 2.4", point to version-2.3 insted of version-2.4. Regards, -- Martin G. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Errors in current trunk (24c2b99d) related to TIMESPEC

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:28:49PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 1/8/18, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Same warning for me. I'm using gcc 7.2.0 from msys2 under windows 10 [1]. > > > > There is yet another update on trunk. Please try

Re: [fossil-users] Errors in current trunk (24c2b99d) related to TIMESPEC

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:53:02PM -0300, Marcelo Huerta wrote: > Richard Hipp decía, en el mensaje "Re: [fossil-users] Errors in current trunk > (24c2b99d) related to TIMESPEC" del 8/1/2018 21:57:35: > > > There are changes on trunk that might fix these build problem. But, > > as nobody here

Re: [fossil-users] How to find deleted files in web interface

Le sam. 6 janv. 2018 à 22:01, Dingyuan Wang a écrit : > Hi, > > In the command line, fossil timeline -p somefile can show the commit > when the file is deleted, while web interface /finfo?name=somefile > can't. It also don't show merges. > > What's the web interface equivalence

Re: [fossil-users] Older fossil archives are not rebuild-able

What version of fossil are you using right now ? (Output of "fossil version") -- Martin G. > Le 12 déc. 2017 à 12:57, J Knight a écrit : > > Hello. I have some older fossil archives that report: > > SQLITE_ERROR: table config has no column named mtime > fossil: table

Re: [fossil-users] Metadata in Timeline Verbose View

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:00:01PM +0100, Florian Balmer wrote: > While talking about the views, please allow me some Compact View bashing: > > Compact View looks plain and elegant, I agree. But whenever I view the > timeline, I'd either like to SEE THE HASHES (to check-out or merge a >

Re: [fossil-users] Metadata in Timeline Verbose View

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:51:17PM +0100, Florian Balmer wrote: > Thanks for the recent timeline changes. > > Most of my check-in comments do not end with a dot. In the timeline > web view, it used to look like this: > > [xx] This is the check-in comment (user: username, tags: trunk) >

Re: [fossil-users] Help improve the Fossil CSS

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:02:52AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 12/11/17, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> The llnk for draft1 is https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/draft1/timeline > > > > This one is by far my favorite one. Separate Checkins

Re: [fossil-users] Help improve the Fossil CSS

> On 4 Dec 2017, 11:07 AM +0800, Steve Landers , > wrote: > > Draft1 omits the borders around checkins in the Modern View, and > > adds a subtle background color for any commits that are not already > > colored. > > > > The rationale is that horizontal lines are “visual

Re: [fossil-users] diff coloring missing?

Do ctrl-f5 to force a full refresh. CSS is cached. Le jeu. 30 nov. 2017 à 09:31, jungle Boogie a écrit : > On Nov 30, 2017 3:35 AM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > > > > On 11/30/17, jungle Boogie wrote: > > >> > > >> In previous

Re: [fossil-users] Weird behavior on Chisel, perhaps a version mismatch?

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:36:07PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 29, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:02:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> On 11/29/17, Jacob MacDonald wrote: > >>> Ah, I see. It seems

Re: [fossil-users] Weird behavior on Chisel, perhaps a version mismatch?

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:02:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 11/29/17, Jacob MacDonald wrote: > > Ah, I see. It seems strange to me that the policy didn't get set when I > > cloned. How can I avoid the same thing in the future and is there any way > > to change the

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:10:28AM -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 29, 2017, at 7:53 AM, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There's a small display glitch, the mouse cursor over the > > Basic/Advanced button is set to "text selection"

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:26:57AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > The 4-view-modes timeline change is now on trunk and is the default on > these sites: > > https://sqlite.org/src/timeline > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline > http://mirror1.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline >

Re: [fossil-users] Weird behavior on Chisel, perhaps a version mismatch?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:01:45PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 11/28/17, Jacob MacDonald wrote: > > On my end, I added a couple of local files in two commits. Then I ran > > "fossil sync". The commits do not show up on Chisel even though the sync > > command says it

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:52:41PM +, Jacob MacDonald wrote: > Seems like I'm in the minority, but I prefer the A version. I tend to like > compact UIs and having all the relevant information close together and the > commit hash prominently displayed is nice. Same for me. With B

Re: [fossil-users] Main repository moved from http to https?

I believe it is not intentional, might be same problem that happens before: https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg24067.html — Martin G. Le mar. 7 nov. 2017 à 06:08, Stephan Beal a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Stefan Bellon

[fossil-users] New settings help change on trunk

Hi, I've notice a regression since checkin [f74f7014], there's no more help text for each settings when doing "fossil help set" or "fossil set --help". Moreover, since mkindex can now extract individual help text from settings, we could add individual settings help text from the CLI when typing:

Re: [fossil-users] src/blob.c : blob_read_from_file overflow int size

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 04:19:53PM +0900, kowlsd3pw...@yahoo.co.jp wrote: > > [837333fc] Fix the blob_read_from_file > thank you. Actually, it is not completely fix because blob_read_from_file() call blob_read_from_channel() which return a int. Anyway, since the internals of the Blob

Re: [fossil-users] "fossil http" doubts

> Le 7 juin 2017 à 02:48, Johan Kuuse a écrit : > >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >>> On 6/6/17, Johan Kuuse wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there any way to access the Fossil built-in webpages using the "fossil >>> http"? >>> In

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with: fossil revert -r xxx

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 09:14:43AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 5/10/17, Ron Aaron wrote: > > I tried to revert to a good revision 'xxx' using "fossil revert -r xxx" > > > > Despite the help stating "Revert all files if no file name is provided", > > instead fossil told

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with: fossil revert -r xxx

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:17:44PM +0300, Ron Aaron wrote: > Sorry, but I can't see how the terminology "... all files if no file > name is provided" could mean anything but what I assumed. > > It may not be used often, but in the event were one has decided, as I > did, that a certain number of

Re: [fossil-users] Can Fossil preserve file timestamps when opening a repository ?

It has been discuss a few times before. I think here is a good summary about why it is like this now: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg15013.html -- Martin G. Le mer. 19 avr. 2017 à 19:41, Martin Irvine a écrit : > Hi, > > This

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: local .fossil-ignore

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 07:29:42AM +1000, rosscann...@fastmail.com wrote: > @Barry: True, but it's clumsy, since you have to specify every path, in > full, in the global ignore-glob file. If you move a subproject to a > different location in the directory tree, you have to remember to update > the

Re: [fossil-users] Couple of beginner questions

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 03:47:32PM -0500, The Tick wrote: > On 3/29/2017 3:04 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:52 PM, >> wrote: > > > >Yes, change your text files to UTF-8 with BOM(unsure without BOM) > >and Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Crash with this AMEND command

FYI: the problem got fixed in trunk 2 days ago. https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/8c22e1bbcd8ec048 -- Martin G. Le lun. 20 mars 2017 à 13:22, Warren Young a écrit : > On Mar 18, 2017, at 11:59 PM, Andy Bradford > wrote: > > > > Thus

Re: [fossil-users] Non empty directories

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:05:28PM +1000, Dan Raymond wrote: > Think I understand: > > If a Folder is empty no add of folder (not sure why the "Character" folder > wouldn't add when it was not empty). subsequent trials worked as supposed > to. > > So not sure what issue was. will play around

Re: [fossil-users] Non empty directories

Waterfront Place, Brisbane 4001 > Tel:+61 733 600 255 > Mob: +61 400 551 920 > Fax: +61 733 600 222 > Web: http://ecourban.com.au > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Does the directory name start with a dot ? The dot fi

Re: [fossil-users] Non empty directories

Does the directory name start with a dot ? The dot files (and dot directories) are ignored by default. So you can try: fossil add --dotfiles . -- Martin G. Le mer. 15 mars 2017 à 06:06, Dan Raymond a écrit : > Pietro, > > addremove Doesn't do it (version 2.10) > >

Re: [fossil-users] Non empty directories

fossil add NEWDIR or fossil add . (Don't forget the "." on the latter., which will all everything under current directory) Regards -- Martin G. Le mer. 15 mars 2017 à 05:03, Dan Raymond a écrit : > How can I get the fossil add command to add new directories under

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil can not import its own git export

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:48:50PM -0500, Artur Shepilko wrote: > Just tried the case of "file name contains a newline char" with git. > Looks like git encodes such names with C-like characters ('\n' for x0A > or '\r' for x0D). > > Git fast-export outputs such files enquoted as follows: > M

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil can not import its own git export

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:02:23PM -0600, Zakero wrote: > In an effort to do some experimenting with the latest release of Fossil: > > ./fossil-2.1 version > This is fossil version 2.1 [83e3445f67] 2017-03-10 17:07:08 UT > > I wanted to export the fossil repository to git. Then import the "git

Re: [fossil-users] Progress report of Fossil 2.x

On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 03:07:04PM +0200, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > -Original Message- From: Warren Young > > > > (3) New repositories are initialized using SHA3 > > Maybe there should be a “fossil init --sha1” option for the > > technologically conservative. > > Or, for practical

Re: [fossil-users] Progress report of Fossil 2.x

In my case, Warren, I agree with you... -- Martin G. On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:24:56AM -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On Mar 1, 2017, at 2:03 AM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > > > > My 'prediction' is that two versions will end up in a similar mess to the > > Python 2.7 vs

Re: [fossil-users] Google Security Blog: Announcing the first SHA1 collision

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:18:29PM -0800, bch wrote: [snip] > > Or more correctly, "a *subsequent* file with the same sha1 hash..." If you > happened to commit the Trojan file first, the "good" commit would have been > the one to fail. > True, but if you pull from untrusted user (or give push

Re: [fossil-users] Google Security Blog: Announcing the first SHA1 collision

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:50:12AM -0800, Marc Simpson wrote: > This may be of interest to some here, especially in light of previous > SHA-1 related discussions on list: > > https://security.googleblog.com/2017/02/announcing-first-sha1-collision.html > Also, Here's a related discussion from

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files not accessible from Web interface

not 1.34. > > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > > > > Le mer. 22 févr. 2017 à 03:33, Tony Papadimitriou <to...@acm.org> a > écrit : > > I placed some unversioned file to a chiselapp repo I maintain and > then from the Web UI tried to locate

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files not accessible from Web interface

Le mer. 22 févr. 2017 à 03:33, Tony Papadimitriou a écrit : > I placed some unversioned file to a chiselapp repo I maintain and then > from the Web UI tried to locate the file but without luck. > There isn’t even a hint that some unversioned file is in the repo, so that > one can

Re: [fossil-users] Directory symlinks...

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:06:34AM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Martin Gagnon wrote: > > > > I'm not sure if this protection is necessary, but if it is, it doesn't > > get triggered if the symlink point directly to "../../dir3/other_ckout" > > since th

Re: [fossil-users] Directory symlinks...

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:10:52PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Martin Gagnon wrote: > > > > Strange, "fossil add a_dir_symlink" doesn't works for the case #2 on my > > actual repository, but if I try to reproduce the problem on a brand new > >

Re: [fossil-users] Directory symlinks...

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 02:29:58PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Martin Gagnon wrote: > > > > But if I do: > > $ fossil add a_dir_symlink/* > > > > It add the content. > > > > Actually, may be it was intended ? > > >

Re: [fossil-users] Directory symlinks...

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 01:11:39PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Martin Gagnon wrote: > > > > $ fossil add a_dir_symlink > > > > Nothing happens... > > > > It was a bit more complex than I thought, made a couple more changes. > >

Re: [fossil-users] Directory symlinks...

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:37:10PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Changes on the "symlinks" branch prevent directory symlinks > from being traversed into if the "allow-symlinks" setting is > enabled or the "--no-dir-symlinks" flag is specified. > > Making this change work correctly also

Re: [fossil-users] Directory symlinks...

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:25:01PM -0700, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Warren Young wrote: > > > > Well, that's a tricky one, innit? Fossil manages files, not directories, > > but Fossil's view of symlinks is file-like. So is it an apple or an > > orange? > > > > I've checked in a fix on the

Re: [fossil-users] Adding binary files to fossil

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:08:40AM -0800, Scott Doctor wrote: > I have a repository with typical C source text files (about 100 > files across several sub-folders). There are a few binary files that > are needed to compile and use the program. The files are part of the > program, but the contents

Re: [fossil-users] EXECUTABLE, and not really being added to updated repo

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:13:01PM -0500, Will Parsons wrote: > On Tuesday, 6 Dec 2016 5:46 PM -0500, bch wrote: > > I've got a collection of files who's apparently only change is the > > EXECUTABLE bit set, but after a commit, they're still showing up in "f > > chan"; I retried w/ a --sha1sum

Re: [fossil-users] fossil amend comment

Hi Arnold, On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 01:15:11PM +0100, arnoldemu wrote: > Hi, > > I submitted a change and made a mistake in the comment. > I wanted to change the comment and fix it. > > I did this: > > fossil amend ba67fcd67c -m "fixed snapshot" > > command reported the comment, tags and

Re: [fossil-users] private branches

Hi Scott, On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 08:47:22PM -0800, Scott Doctor wrote: > Reading through the fossil documentation about private branches. It > states that There is no way to convert a private branch into a > public branch. But all of the changes associated with the private > branch are folded

Re: [fossil-users] OpenSSL in the source tree

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:18:50AM -0400, Adam Jensen wrote: > When compiling on CentOS-7, 'configure --with-openssl=auto' doesn't find > what is needed. How can OpenSSL or LibreSSL source be placed in the > 'fossil/compat' directory such that 'configure --with-openssl=tree' will > work? I've

Re: [fossil-users] features I'd like to have in fossil

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:08:47AM -0400, Ron W wrote: >At the risk of wading in to a minefield, I have some thoughts. >On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:14 PM, ><[1]fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > From: Nikita Borodikhin <[2]elit...@gmail.com> > Date: Fri,

Re: [fossil-users] export.c fail with MSVC

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 03:18:04PM -0700, jungle Boogie wrote: > Hi All, > > In my adventure to build fossil on windows with MSVC 2010, I > encountered the error below: > > cl /c /nologo /MT /O2 /I. /I..\src /I..\win\include > /I..\compat\zlib /Fo.\export.obj -c export_.c > export_.c >

Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

> Le 20 oct. 2016 à 02:57, Luca Ferrari a écrit : > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Aldo Nicolas Bruno > wrote: >> Better question can be, how fossil manage collisions? > > Just a side note: according to v1.31 >

Re: [fossil-users] Errors trying to compile

I believe you can use the standard ./configure && make in the Cygwin environment. But I never tried it personally. -- Martin > Le 12 oct. 2016 à 21:38, Dan Raymond a écrit : > > Thanks. > > What is best environment etc to compile under windows? > > > > > Level 19

Re: [fossil-users] Files named "AUX" on Windows

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:40:59PM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 04 Oct 2016 12:15:58 -0400: > > > Does anybody know of a reasonable work-around? > > What do other VCS do? Presumably CVS, SVN, Hg, Git, etc. have all > Wsupported indows for a long time. Do

Re: [fossil-users] feature requests

-- Martin > Le 15 sept. 2016 à 03:45, Aldo Nicolas Bruno a écrit > : > > Il 14/09/2016 21:12, Richard Hipp ha scritto: >> Anywhere you can put a SHA1 hash prefix for a version name, you can >> also supply a branch name (which will resolve to the most recent >>

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

> Le 30 juin 2016 à 20:47, Ron W a écrit : > > > > As for the From header, a newer version of the Mailman list manager would get > us the option to replace just the address in the From header. +1 > That would help mitigate the problem that Richard was trying to

Re: [fossil-users] Push to multiple remote urls at once

> Le 22 mai 2016 à 07:23, Thomas Levine <_...@thomaslevine.com> a écrit : > > Hi, > > I want to keep two remote backups of my repository. Can I configure > fossil to push to multiple URLs on "push"? Or, is there a better way to > make redundant backups of fossil repositories? > > Tom You can

Re: [fossil-users] fossil update --latest not working

> Le 8 mars 2016 à 05:23, Stephan Beal a écrit : > >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM, John Regehr wrote: >> I have an extremely simply use case for fossil: I'm tracking the latest >> sqlite sources but I have some modifications in my local

Re: [fossil-users] ./src/delta.c:231: checksum: Assertion failed

> Le 19 févr. 2016 à 20:53, Andy Bradford a écrit : > > Thus said Warren Young on Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:45:34 -0700: > >> #5 0x004237f6 in blob_delta_create (pOriginal=> out>, pTarget=0x7fffe330, pDelta=0x7fffe370) at ./src/deltacmd.c:40 > > I could be

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:37:51PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > Just an FYI: I use a circa-2002 iBook for testing SQLite on (32-bit > big-endian) PPC. The iBook is loaded with Mac OS 10.2. 20GB hard > disk and 256MB of RAM. > > Fossil still compiles and runs fine on that old dinosaur. It

Re: [fossil-users] kudos to whoever did the "Blitz" skin

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:05:13PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: >Hi, Fossilers, >i was about to ask the list for fancy fossil skin suggestions when i found >the new(?) "Blitz" skin. >Kudos to whoever put that together! Very slick :). Same for me, this skin is pretty neat. I use this

Re: [fossil-users] Is fossil export known to be broken?

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 02:12:01PM +0100, Piotr Orzechowski wrote: > I've just looked at release notes for 1.34 and 1.33 and there was no > straightforward note about need to rebuild repositories. Maybe it would > be better to add such information to requiring release notes, or maybe > even fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Is fossil export known to be broken?

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 02:47:59PM +, org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote: > On 2015-12-12T14:21:19 + > wrote: > > > > Ideally, I'd be able to reproduce this with a somewhat smaller > > repository... > > Surprisingly, this turned out to be

Re: [fossil-users] Is fossil export known to be broken?

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 09:18:12PM +, org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote: > On 2015-12-12T16:07:23 -0500 > Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > What version of git and fossil are you using ? > > > > I cannot reproduce the problem u

Re: [fossil-users] Is fossil export known to be broken?

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:09:26PM +, org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote: > On 2015-12-12T21:43:49 + > <org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com> wrote: > > > On 2015-12-12T16:21:14 -0500 > > Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

Re: [fossil-users] Time to release Fossil version 1.34?

> Le 20 oct. 2015 à 03:45, Jan Nijtmans a écrit : > > 2015-10-20 9:16 GMT+02:00 Marcel Graf : >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Joe Mistachkin >> wrote: >>> There seems to be a timeline issue: >>> >>>

Re: [fossil-users] diff after update

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 01:10:28PM +0200, j. van den hoff wrote: > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:45:28 +0200, Johan Kuuse wrote: > > >fossil diff -before > > > >or > > > >fossil diff -before-commit > > typo... I just wanted to propose another name for the requested > option, and actually

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:29:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 10 September 2015 at 15:17, j. van den hoff > wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:05:09 +0200, Stephan Beal > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Baruch Burstein

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:39:49PM +0300, Baruch Burstein wrote: >On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:03 PM, j. van den hoff ><[1]veedeeh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > and it really is just irrelevant for the simple envisaged convenience > measure: being able to use the ranks instead of

Re: [fossil-users] Files shared (and updated) between repos?

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:46PM +0200, Johan Kuuse wrote: Hi, Everytime I create a new repos, I use a few files which I would like to have access to in all my repos: - README.fossil.new.repo : My own notes about how to setup a new repo. - setup-fossil.sh : A script how to setup a new

Re: [fossil-users] bring back a deleted file; unsure of command syntax

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:20:24PM +0200, arnoldemu wrote: Hi, I did a merge, merging trunk into my sound branch. I submitted it and then I noticed that merge had caused fossil to delete some files (the files were in the sound branch but not in trunk). How can I go back to the previous

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil set mv-rm-files' throws error no such setting: mv-rm-files in 1.33 [18fc492a95]

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 01:32:43PM +0200, j. van den hoff wrote: the new `mv-rm-files' setting is not working for me as per subject of this mail. what am I missing? do I need to use some compile time flag (wouldn't think so ...)? thx/j ps: if it matters, I see this on a macosx machine.

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.33 - /reports failing

There was a typo in my example.. But Ross Berteig gave a more clear explanation than this example. On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:49:42PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: But here, if I'm not mistaken the problem was more like: -- char

Re: [fossil-users] Responsive UI?

I didn't try the desktop version yet, but the mobile version is pretty neat... -- Martin G. Le samedi 30 mai 2015, John Found johnfo...@asm32.info a écrit : It is wonderful! Simple and stylish. On Sat, 30 May 2015 14:05:35 -0300 Camilo Polymeris cpolyme...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:

Re: [fossil-users] workflow question

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 07:25:43AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On 5/27/15, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: he wants to ensure that students can never mess up trunk, i.e. must technically not be able to merge anything into trunk. ... The other approach would be to

Re: [fossil-users] imported from git: a question about performances and about tags

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 06:57:18AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On 5/26/15, Luca Ferrari fluca1...@infinito.it wrote: In the meantime I've tried to rebuild the repository: % fossil rebuild /sviluppo/fossil/myrepo.fossil --analyze --vacuum but it seems to me things are going worst: %

Re: [fossil-users] Linux compilation problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 04:27:31PM +0300, to...@acm.org wrote: Q1: How do I solve this?  (I have already tried ./configure and didn’t make any difference)   ./bld/piechart.o: In function `piechart_render': ./src/piechart.c:176: undefined reference to `sincos'

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil error fossil knows nothing about: C20131_IR_At7_OpSystem_ProjectFile.fossil

May be you can set 'Gary_Gabriel_Dev' as the default user for this repo. $ fossil user default Gary_Gabriel_Dev -- Martin G. (From a mobile: Excuse brevity and top posting.) Le mercredi 13 mai 2015, Gary_Gabriel gabrielrobert.qu...@googlemail.com a écrit : Hi Warren, Thanks for your

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:19:46PM -0700, Matt Welland wrote: On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Andy Bradford [1]amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Piotr Orzechowski on Tue, 07 Apr 2015 19:46:22 +0200: If they  can happen  when two  people push  to central  repository

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix parallel timeline

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:53:10AM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: BTW, chiselapp.com still use version 1.25 release. The same problem could happens easily when using the Clone Repository option if the source repo is created without initial empty check-in. Sorry.. I just notice that it really

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix parallel timeline

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:59:26AM +0100, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2015-03-13 8:49 GMT+01:00 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: Richard mentioned earlier that he will remove the no initial commit bits, which will (theoretically, at least) eliminate this problem for future versions. i would hate

  1   2   3   4   >