Re: [fossil-users] Conversation with a CM guy

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:22 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > If fossil had a more polished gui to move files and bring up boxes to > type in commit messages, it may be more popular too. As it is, most > fossil commands seem straight forward in my use cases. > Some of my

Re: [fossil-users] Conversation with a CM guy

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov < > flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >> >> And ways to integrate Fossil to popular solutions like MSVS and Visual >> Studio Code appear to be of increasing

Re: [fossil-users] git rebase, and what it looks like in Fossil

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > > So what would a Fossil analogue be? For simple cases, merge -baseline > root:branch does the trick. > > But if the branch being merged also includes merges from other branches > for the purpose of updating its

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: auto-closing of tickets a la Trac

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Warren Young wrote: > Again, I don’t see why you’d want to spend a lot of effort expanding TH1 > to support this. That requires every Fossil user to rebuild Fossil with > TH1 hook support and install the custom hook. This should be built into

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: auto-closing of tickets a la Trac

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > We aren’t talking about fossil ui. We’re talking about > > $ f ci -m “closes [12345abc]” > > Under your scheme, that would run a TH1 commit hook. So: does an HTTP > call made from fossil ci send a suitable cookie to

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: auto-closing of tickets a la Trac

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > On May 12, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The update would be to the same repo as the commit, so the URL would be " > http://localhost:8080/tktedit; so cr

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: auto-closing of tickets a la Trac

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > Where would it get the user credentials for that? Modifying tickets is > not allowed for anonymous. > The update would be to the same repo as the commit, so the URL would be " http://localhost:8080/tktedit; so

Re: [fossil-users] How to create a ticket link in the wiki?

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Aslak Raanes <asl...@ntnu.no> wrote: > On 12 May 2016, at 23:09, Ron W wrote: > > As I recall, Fossil uses libdiscount > > You mean Natasha Kerensikova’s libsoldout > <https://github.com/faelys/libsoldout>? > Now that you menti

Re: [fossil-users] How to create a ticket link in the wiki?

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Fossils's Markdown [3] page also mentions "automatic links", which are > URLs or email addresses enclosed in < and >. This is not mentioned in > either libdiscount or PHP Markdown E

Re: [fossil-users] How to create a ticket link in the wiki?

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > Clearly this would be an extension to Markdown. Doesn’t Fossil already > have a few of those? Tables, at the least. As I recall, Fossil uses libdiscount [1] to provide markdown support. that library provides PHP

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: auto-closing of tickets a la Trac

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On May 11, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Marko Käning > wrote: > > > > An auto-closing of tickets if the commit comment contains stg like > "closed [TICKETID]", "closes [TICKETID]", "fixed [TICKETID]", "fixes

Re: [fossil-users] Workaround for the missing 'squash' command?

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > > What happens when you merge a private branch into trunk? You get a single commit that represents all the changes from the branch. This is unlike "git merge --fast-forward". (I don't know what just "git merge"

Re: [fossil-users] Workaround for the missing 'squash' command?

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > How to achieve a git'ish squash when merging a (private) branch into trunk? > > Is this deliberately missing functionality following fossil's mission to > keep all history? > I think you are misunderstanding how a

Re: [fossil-users] How to migrate a repository's wiki pages to another repo?

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi list, > > how can one migrate a repository's wiki pages to another repo? > Push will push all content changes, including public check-ins, and wiki, ticket, and tech-note edits. > One could imagine to have

Re: [fossil-users] Noob usage questions

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Arnel wrote: > > > Doesn't working on a branch marked private and merging it later (upon > approval) > essentially provide the benefits of "squashing" the commits? The only > difference > would be the branch commits themselves will not be

Re: [fossil-users] Noob usage questions

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Steve Schow wrote: > > > if so, not a big deal then, just have to use wrapper scripts to make sure > to follow your work flow, always create a new branch on the first commit > for any ticket. I will probably use a cookie or something to make

Re: [fossil-users] Noob usage questions

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Steve Schow wrote: > > Nice work flow… > Thanks. It is simplified to highlight the key parts. > In the above workflow, here are my questions: > > 1 - step#4 is fine because dev is working on a branch. do you have any > mechanisms in place to

Re: [fossil-users] Noob usage questions

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > Right well I’m just trying to figure out a way to automate thing so the > dev never has to worry about copy and pasting any kind of ticket or checkin > numbers from one place to another. I want it to just happen

Re: [fossil-users] Noob usage questions

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > > the question about auto-sync is only an open ended question. There could > be some work flows that may work with or without it as far as i can tell, > but i’m just asking about what others might be doing.. > > with

Re: [fossil-users] fossil as a website content manager

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Scott Doctor wrote: > I am starting yet another project, well an offshoot of a current one (like > I don't have too many already). This one I need to put some stuff on a > password protected page (usually using .htaccess) on my website so

Re: [fossil-users] Announcement of a Fossil Usability Enhancement Wrapper Script

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Martin Vahi wrote: > > I have not been able to extensively test it yet, neither > is it anything very optimized and never will be, as a > matter of fact, it's very inefficient, but it does > have a practical feature set and might help

Re: [fossil-users] Add styling to my repo's fossil wiki?

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:25 PM, John Gabriele wrote: > Is there any way I can add custom css styling to my fossil repo's wiki? > Specifically, I'd like to add table borders and border-collapse. > Go to the "Skins" item on the "Admin" page of your Fossil web UI. (example:

Re: [fossil-users] Using fossil just for the wiki. Images and tables?

Looking at the official Markdown syntax, I don't see any mention of a syntax - other than embedded HTML - for formatting tables. Fossil's Markdown support is via libdiscount, but that doesn't have a table extension, though does have other extensions to Markdown. On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:33 PM,

Re: [fossil-users] feature challenge: /reports in CSV

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > how about adding CSV export feature to the /reports pages? > This would also be useful for ticket reports (both in the web UI and the CLI).. Currently (at work, so I had to get permission to post this), I use the

Re: [fossil-users] Move git repo to fossil wiki

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Andy Bradford wrote: > But as for converting from embedded documentation to wiki, I cannot > imagine it would be too difficult if the markdown is similar. Fossil wiki markup and Fossil markdown markup are both used for both Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Semi-annual drumming-up-of-support for libfossil

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Carlo Miron wrote: > >> Still using Emacs :-? >> > > er yes, but i am adjusting to the right hand for the ctrl key :/. Or > trying to. > > -- > - stephan beal >

Re: [fossil-users] Semi-annual drumming-up-of-support for libfossil

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Carlo Miron wrote: > >> Still using Emacs :-? >> > > er yes, but i am adjusting to the right hand for the ctrl key :/. Or > trying to. > At least you can get

Re: [fossil-users] How to get artifact's content as raw text in one click?

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Steve Stefanovich wrote: > I think it is a good idea.‎ It would be especially useful for search > results - see: > Should not be hard. The core functionality required is available in libmagic (which is available for MS Windows as well as

Re: [fossil-users] Completely untagged commits ?

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > i agree with Andy B. that "publish" is not the right command here - that's > intended for bundles, as i understand it. i've no experience with bundles. > The docs suggest it's also applicable to ant private artifacts

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil mentioned on HN

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Gaurav M. Bhandarkar wrote: > > fast forward merges is just one of the advantages of rebase. It is done to > avoid the extra “merge-commit” and thus reduces the noise in repo history. > Don't need rebase to use fast-forward merge. As I

Re: [fossil-users] Command line access to technotes and attachments

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:38 AM, David Vines wrote: Run various subcommands to work with wiki entries or tech notes. > >Options: > -M|-mimetype TEXT-FORMAT The mime type of the update > defaulting to the type used

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil mentioned on HN

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Warren Young wrote: > Could someone who understands “git rebase” weigh in on that thread? > People are claiming that “fossil shun” means there is no difference between > Git and Fossil. > > Either my understanding of fossil shun is just as weak

Re: [fossil-users] Command line access to technotes and attachments

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 12/14/15, David Vines wrote: > > I've just started playing with fossil for my personal projects and I'm > > considering getting my some of my one-touch builds to create a technote > > with the

Re: [fossil-users] Migrating github issues to fossil

python > library 'pandas' was really helpful here) > > It worked out nicely, and now I'm really close to ditching all my github > stuff. Awesome! > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Tim

Re: [fossil-users] Password prompt with SSH protocol on Windows?

I would use Pageant if you don't want to have to respond to an interactive password prompt. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Daniel Dumitriu wrote: > Hi, > > Coming back to my own unanswered question: it seems like it has to do > with standard (PuTTY) plink's

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion for local/global settings enhancement

This would be a very helpful enhancement. On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:05 PM, wrote: > > My suggestion is this: > > Have some form of shorthand notation – a text replacement macro, if you > like – (like the string “~global~”, for example – or some other that is > very unlikely to be

Re: [fossil-users] Migrating github issues to fossil

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Tim Johnston wrote: > I'm wondering about migrating my github 'issues' and turning them into > fossil 'tickets'. Does anyone have experience with this? Any > recommendations for approaching it? > I can't help with parsing the github tickets,

Re: [fossil-users] Fuel SCM --httpauth

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Dömötör Gulyás wrote: > We seem to be able to make fossil do things via windows shortcuts. And > Fuel runs fine, except that it's apparently impossible to configure it to > use --httpauth, or to make it use the url and credentials stored in

Re: [fossil-users] problems with links in embedded documents

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > That's all well and good, but Joerg is right - it would be convenient > to be able to specify the root of the repository in a hyperlink. I've > pondered making that possible with some bit of magic like > "[$ROOT/wcontent]"

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Dömötör Gulyás wrote: > I've got an environment where it'd be good to put a fossil repo onto a > windows network share, as running an actual server is hindered by corporate > IT policy. Has anybody done this, or is this at least theoretically

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Dömötör Gulyás wrote: > Unfortunately the corporate network in this case is rather conservative, > and I can't have a server running, plus I can't even connect my main dev > laptop to the corp network... rather silly, the whole thing is. >

Re: [fossil-users] Slight file renames

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:38 PM, bch wrote: > In the immediate case, it's me tracking 3rd party vendor code which I > depend on. I untar, add, commit. On upstream updates, I nuke the 3rd-party > code, lay down the new release and this is where we might find renaming >

Re: [fossil-users] Slight file renames

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:20 PM, bch wrote: > This is roughly what I'm doing, but it's not 100% accurate, and for > the case of 100s of files, still tedious. I guess the point is that > there's not any special secret method available with-in or outside > fossil (outside of

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > On 2 November 2015 at 20:40, Richard Hipp wrote: > > But on the other hand, you should not be checking-in untested changes. > > The proper way to do incremental check-ins is to stash the whole lot, >

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks (was Re: xkcd on git)

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:16 PM, bch wrote: > > Philosophically, I think of links as build artifacts, which are rarely > stored in an scm. I do avoid them as much as possible, but I've > occasionally wondered: does anybody manage the links as the build artifacts > of a

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > > From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS_symbolic_link#Restrictions: The > default security settings in Windows Vista/Windows 7 > disallow non-elevated > administrators and

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks (was Re: xkcd on git)

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:00 PM, bch wrote: > > After I posted this, I thought a Makefile (still to manage actual > symlinks) would be an improvement over a shell script; you're punting > on symlinks completely (using VPATH). How has VPATH (or the previous > shell script)

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > But if it only stores a pointer, and requires the user to reconstruct the > link, it's not terribly useful/friendly. The user would potentially have to > replace fossil's placeholder pseudosymlink file with a link of

Re: [fossil-users] SHA1 and security

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > But, I think you’re not realizing that artifact chaining removes the > attraction of replacing old artifacts. As I understand it, you can’t > replace an artifact 10 checkins back from the tip of the branch without >

Re: [fossil-users] git LFS

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Abilio Marques wrote: ... > As far as I can see, binary files get uploaded into a web server using > PUT, and then a reference is made into the repo. That way git doesn't deal > with useless DIFFs of such files. Then, when a checkout is made,

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > Similar problem here. I thought I would get the image to display as part > of the Wiki page and not as an attachment link. > > Is there a way to make the attached image display directly when opening > the wiki page? (I

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > The logo is a special case handled in the site-level config iirc. > I only used it as an example because it was the only image file I found on the Fossil site. (Only glanced through several pages that seemed likely

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil support for Go(lang)'s "go get" cmd

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Gour wrote: > > sometime ago I submitted a ticket for Fossil support in Go(lang)'s "go > get" command ( > https://github.com/golang/go/issues/10010#issuecomment-147170394). > ... > here is the appropriate docs: > >

Re: [fossil-users] Best way to work with two related repos?

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Ron Aaron wrote: > I'm looking for a good way to handle the following scenario: > > > I have a main repo with ongoing development. Now I have a customer who > wants a customized version of my product. > > The obvious thing is to simply add a

Re: [fossil-users] Cloning repos in local group?

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Steve Stefanovich wrote: > ‎It hasn't got anything to do with sub-repos. If you use login group, you > cannot clone with authorisation any of the repos that joined the group, > sub-repos or not. > > This is not optimal because it forces you to

Re: [fossil-users] How to embed image in project home page or wiki pages?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:24 PM, The Tick wrote: > > > That is one of the features that I was looking for. How to get the URL for > that to put on the 'home' page is one of my next tasks. I doubt that most > windows users would explore fossil's interface (and understand it

Re: [fossil-users] How to embed image in project home page or wiki pages?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:18 PM, The Tick wrote: > > I did run across a way to embed an image that is checked in as part of a > project: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3982999/fossil-how-to-display-checked-in-image-files-on-wiki-pages > > However, if I do that, then the

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > For files/blobs, only their content is hashed (their name/timestamp/etc., > if any, is not used). No salt is used. If i'm not mistaken (but might be), > a salt is irrelevant (or unnecessary) in a non-cryptographic

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Indeed, fossil's model allows any hash to be used, but it is not possible > to change the hash without a near-complete overhaul of fossil (and its > docs), nor without invalidating every repo in existence, so it's

Re: [fossil-users] Admin->Configuration suggests '/home' as index page. How do I create '/home'?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:54 PM, The Tick wrote: > > After starting 'fossil ui', I go Admin->Configuration > > The Index page value has the suggestion to use '/home'. I did that. Now, > how do I create this '/home' page? > >From the instructions on that set up page: The

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > > I wasn't really thinking of who might want to do it, just that sha1 isn't > being used for cryptographic security and that would be covered by other > means (GPG for example). > The hashes can be important for

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Warren Young wrote: > The question is, “Why does this UI web page have to *say* that it is a > SHA-1 hash?” > > If this page just said “checkin ID,” what would be lost? > As far as VCS functionality, nothing. On the other hand, many projects

Re: [fossil-users] Multiple Projects in one Repo

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Oliver Friedrich < redtalonof+mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My current solution is to have one repository with an empty initial > check-in tagged as ROOT. Then I do one branch per sub-project based on the > ROOT check-in. > > That way I'm able to keep my code

Re: [fossil-users] diff after update

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > Let me put it a bit differently than before, since I don’t seem to be > getting my point across. When you say “fossil up” and get a whole pile of > changes, your next question is, “What exactly is the content of those >

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > I wonder if this is an implementation detail leaking through into the UI, > though. Under what conditions, except for Noam’s contrived example with > hardcoded dates, is there a useful distinction between “hash” —

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Warren Young wrote: > It isn’t really a hash since it isn’t computed from the contents of the > artifact. It’s just a random number, expressed as a long hex string. It > *looks* like a hash, but it isn’t. Proof: > > cd ~/tmp > f new

Re: [fossil-users] diff after update

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Sep 11, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Maybe "--from-undo" is slightly better, but not a great deal. > > Though --from-undo is better in that it tells you what the option does, > you have to

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:17 AM, j. van den hoff wrote: > > well, I'm only talking about the ordinal numbers chronologically > enumerating the timeline checkin(!) entries. this enumeration will not > change as a consequence of rebuild, right? it might change after a

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: > > I realized mid change the other day that the repo I was in had a bunch of > IDE private project data files that had been checked in. (Rant: Just when > will IDE authors learn to prominently document their project

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: > > Some DVCS, like hg, use both an hash and a sequential number. As I recall (been a few years since I last used hg), the numbers were "relative" to the output of hg's equivalent to "timeline". Assuming I am

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown checkin comments and tickets (was: Multi line formatting)

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Aug 31, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > I think we can agree that using hooks to enforce, say, code formatting > rules is a bad idea. > > I did a bit of Googling, and this blog article

Re: [fossil-users] Modifying button bar

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Aug 31, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Scott Doctor wrote: > > > > how can I customize the buttons on the button bar at the top of the page > > Admin -> Skins -> Header. Or just: Admin -> Header (At least

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil added to AstLinux

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com wrote: On Aug 27, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: Why a and not d (developer)? Seems to me that would cover the needed permissions to manager the Astrix and AstLinux conf files. I meant 'v

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil added to AstLinux

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com wrote: Fossil hit our radar, and we wondered if it could be used to track changes to these configuration files in a way a non-developer type could easily understand. Long story short, success, Fossil is a gem ! Good

Re: [fossil-users] Carriage-return/line-feed issues

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Wayne Hajas haj...@shaw.ca wrote: Later, I look at the time-line for the repository, and all the line-breaks are gone from my change-description. It is all one run-on paragraph. Go to the admin page in the web UI, then go to the time line settings page and

Re: [fossil-users] can not purge?

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: I could be mistaken, but I think the purge command is intended to be used with a bundle, and not a checkout in an existing repository, but I could be wrong. Yes, purge is meant for unimporting a bundle.

Re: [fossil-users] quick poll: do you generally use add/rm or mv

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: Unix mv would have renamed the directory from dir to dir2, i.e. made the new directory, moved all files and subdirectories into it, then removed the old directory. Actually, the directory just gets rename. And if the

Re: [fossil-users] Idea: automatic check for extras prior to commit

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: I think this would be a useful feature. To me this all sounds like fossil enforcing project-specific policy, which is something it most certainly

Re: [fossil-users] Idea: automatic check for extras prior to commit

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: I think this would be a useful feature. To me this all sounds like fossil enforcing project-specific policy, which is something it most certainly

Re: [fossil-users] better git migration

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 5:38 AM, org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote: An initial run of fossil export | git fast-import seems to show no pgp signatures in the resulting git repository. This doesn't seem unreasonable, given that it's obviously not going to be possible to forge new

Re: [fossil-users] Searching checked-in emails

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: One of my Fossil repositories contains a bunch of checked-in emails. I archive all my email discussions with the customer directly in the repository so it's as secure as everything else. ... However, emails from the

Re: [fossil-users] Searching checked-in emails

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: I wish to preserve the original emails so signatures validate. I also prefer one file per email. I suppose you could save the decoded body text as the commit comment: 1. extract and decode body of message being

Re: [fossil-users] SQLITE_BUSY ?

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:10:36PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On 6/17/15, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote: Out of curiosity; why aren't pulls 100% read-only on the server? The

Re: [fossil-users] SQLITE_BUSY ?

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: I'm aware of the sync protocol. My point is that all clusters should already exist on the public master repository as part of other sync operations and I would strongly argue that this is the case that should

Re: [fossil-users] Collaborative deployment of Fossil without a server

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Mark fos...@happybeing.com wrote: no way for remote devices to communicate with a server on another client over HTTP (because this would defeat the security of the network). So SAFE Network does support applications that use TCP ? Fossil's sync protocol

Re: [fossil-users] Collaborative deployment of Fossil without a server

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Mark fos...@happybeing.com wrote: Its not really a shared disk. I described it because what I have in mind is similar to sharing a disk. In practice, the data is stored on the p2p network, spread all over the place. However, each user with access has the

Re: [fossil-users] relative vs full path for external diff command

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-06-04 19:22 GMT+02:00 Joe Mistachkin: First, I read the code involved very carefully and experimented with it here locally. I wanted to agree with the change when I thought it was only impacting the file

Re: [fossil-users] Share ticket system recipes

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote: The stock Fossil ticketing system is pretty bare-bones. I’d like to see some ways others have modified the ticketing system to suit their needs. 3 years ago, I shared on this list some ticket customizations I did using TH1.

Re: [fossil-users] Irrecoverable repository inconsistency between local and remote, after an assertion failure on Windows.

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Ardie H. Hwang li...@ardiefox.me wrote: Clearly, server does not know the existence of check-in `da19b8f2e5d89310d80b90a6a27d2d70ff646ad1`. Is there any advice on resolving this issue? Have you looked at the time line on the server? I think the most straight

Re: [fossil-users] relative vs full path for external diff command

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-04-25 1:29 GMT+02:00 Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com: Would it be reasonable for Fossil to have a setting, or option in the diff/gdiff command setting, to indicate that relative paths should be supplied? You

Re: [fossil-users] relative vs full path for external diff command

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-04-25 1:29 GMT+02:00 Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com: Would it be reasonable for Fossil to have a setting, or option in the diff/gdiff command setting, to indicate that relative paths should be supplied? You

Re: [fossil-users] how to move commits to a different branch

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Luca Ferrari on Fri, 29 May 2015 13:59:17 +0200: But if I could say, the option newbranch does not look good at me, since it a little too long. Fossil can have both long and short names for a

Re: [fossil-users] how to move commits to a different branch

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Luca Ferrari fluca1...@infinito.it wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: fossil edit UUID ?OPTIONS? I'll second that! But if I could say, the option newbranch does not look good at me, since it a little too

Re: [fossil-users] WARNING: multiple open leaf check-ins on trunk:

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:29 PM, to...@acm.org wrote: As to what happened you probably guessed right. I must have used the --branch option from within the 'mistake' branch. I was (until just now) under the impression that the --branch option either starts a new branch (if the name given is

Re: [fossil-users] how to move commits to a different branch

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: So perhaps something similar like: fossil branch mv BRANCH-NAME BASIS I think fossil branch mv BASIS BRANCH-NAME is more intuitive (also consistent with fossil mv OLDNAME NEWNAME)

Re: [fossil-users] how to move commits to a different branch

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: It is possible. I've done it. It just takes a strong understanding of how propagating tags works and requires multiple commands with just the right types of tags. There is not yet a single command that

Re: [fossil-users] how to move commits to a different branch

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Luca Ferrari fluca1...@infinito.it wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: As I understand it, you need to add 2 tags: branch=mybranch and sym-mybranch Uhm..I've done a few experiments and apparently the following

Re: [fossil-users] workflow question

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: I wonder if it would be a good idea to implement a new feature that would be half way between per-branch push permission and emailing bundles ? I am wondering if there's a way to do a pull in such a way that it could be

Re: [fossil-users] workflow question

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:06 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, 27 May 2015 19:24:38 +0200, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:10 AM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: the request to work on branch is the catch: he wants

Re: [fossil-users] Docker image for fossil on the Raspberry Pi

This is certainly an interesting project. Thanks. I think this is a further example of the value of having a page on the Fossil website listing community projects that could be useful to other users of Fossil. On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Remco Schoen remco_sch...@me.com wrote: Hi all,

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >