[fossil-users] link to list archives broken

Hello the link to list archives on this page: http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users is broken. Could somebody correct or remove it? Thanks Michal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Internal hyperlinks, content-type and stuff

On 19 May 2010 20:27, Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote: Hello I considered to use fossil for my project but the curernt release is unusable for me. I could not find any way for fossil to store non-text files and serve them over http with the correct content-type, either inferred by some magic or

[fossil-users] Inverted style for fossil

Hello Since all the fossil styles are broken and on top of that they are on white background which sucks I have written a CSS with dark background. If somebody else wants such style here it is. Note that it was evolved from one of the styles with no logo and I probably do not use some fossil

[fossil-users] CGI issues

Hello I tried installing fossil as CGI on Apache 1.3 and there is some difference form what is in the docs. Firstly I had to use a script like this: #!/path-to-fossil/fossil cgi repository: /path-to-repo.fossil Note the cgi parameter. Without that the server would just report an internal

Re: [fossil-users] CGI issues

On 20 May 2010 08:58, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote: I tried installing fossil as CGI on Apache 1.3 and there is some difference form what is in the docs. Firstly I had to use a script like

[fossil-users] vim syntax file for wiki pages

Hello, does anybody have a syntax file for the .wiki doc pages? I could probably write one but it would be pointless effort if somebody has done so already. Thanks Michal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

[fossil-users] direct wiki links for doc pages and images?

Hello the .wiki doc pages can include links in brackets. However, the links point to the wiki, not the doc pages. While this may be adequate for some doc links in many cases one would want to link to other doc pages which is somewhat tedious with full HTML. The same applies to images I guess

Re: [fossil-users] direct wiki links for doc pages and images?

On 24 May 2010 20:44, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote: Hello the .wiki doc pages can include links in brackets. However, the links point to the wiki, not the doc pages. Make your links like this:   [/doc/tip

[fossil-users] Patch to not show files not added to repository in /doc/ckout

Hello Since fossil happily serves files not added to repository in /doc/ckout I fixed the issue locally to make /doc/ckout match /doc/tip after the changes are committed. The issue is reported as 0e5d75657f I do not understand the fossil source well enough to make changes with confidence but

Re: [fossil-users] Patch to not show files not added to repository in /doc/ckout

On 26 May 2010 19:58, Eric Junkermann e...@deptj.eu wrote: On 25 May 2010 23:38, Eric Junkermann e...@deptj.eu wrote: On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:10 pm, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote: On 25 May 2010 19:59, Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote: ... But ckout is only available if the server

[fossil-users] Patch to add /doc/idx which shows the files in the working tree which are added to the repository

Hello Here is a modification to the previous patch which introduces yet another doc path (/doc/idx) which shows the same files as /doc/ckout does but shows an error when the file is not yet added to the repository (with fossil add). Thanks Michal Index: src/doc.c

[fossil-users] CSS fix

Hello sending a patch which fixes the fossil CSS. Currently the CSS is broken because it sets background color and not text color which may result in some nice visual effects like white text on white pages. Reported as issue 53aa95f382 Thanks Michal Index: src/skins.c

[fossil-users] Use redirect instead of serving index.wiki for /doc

Hello This is a fix for the /doc url. Currently the /doc/tip/index.wiki file is served for the /doc url but the links are not adjusted so the file has broken links if served from /doc ie if you have a href=doc1.wikiTopic1/a in index.wiki the link would not work if index.wiki is served as /doc

[fossil-users] Place to post patches?

Hello Is there a good place for posting fossil patches? There are a few which I posted here a while ago. One got some replies but the others are just archived in the ML and aging. There is no way to attach files (including patches) to bug reports so that they won't get forgotten. Thanks

Re: [fossil-users] Place to post patches?

On 17 June 2010 16:07, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote: Hello Is there a good place for posting fossil patches? There are a few which I posted here a while ago. One got some replies but the others are just

Re: [fossil-users] Mix of UTF-8 and CP1251 (Russian cyrillic) in project

On 25 June 2010 12:15, Sergey Sfeli sergey.sf...@gmail.com wrote: Ruslan Popov wrote: I've tried to use Fossil on russian version of Windows 7. I made commit with russian text in comment, when I run the UI and look at timeline, I saw that russian text looks like squares. Why don't just use

Re: [fossil-users] Mix of UTF-8 and CP1251 (Russian cyrillic) in project

On 25 June 2010 20:18, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote: One of the reasons that I'm a fan of SCSU is that, with even a relatively simple encoder, it produces output which is comparable in efficiency to that of most legacy encodings. SCSU is a horrendous encoding because it uses

Re: [fossil-users] Mix of UTF-8 and CP1251 (Russian cyrillic) in project

On 25 June 2010 21:37, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote: On 25 June 2010 19:36, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote: On 25 June 2010 20:18, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote: One of the reasons that I'm a fan of SCSU is that, with even a relatively simple encoder

Re: [fossil-users] Mix of UTF-8 and CP1251 (Russian cyrillic) in project

On 26 June 2010 18:05, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote: On 26 June 2010 13:47, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote: On 25 June 2010 21:37, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote: On 25 June 2010 19:36, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote: On 25 June 2010 20:18, Owen

[fossil-users] SSL support?

Helllo I tried building fossil trunk (with a few patches) and when I try to commit fossil says: Autosync: https://another repo URL fossil: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support I clearly see gcc -g -Os -Wall -DFOSSIL_ENABLE_SSL -I. -I./src -o ./obj/http.o -c http_.c Is SSL no

[fossil-users] Way of submitting fossil patches so that they get looked at?

Hello I have submitted patches for tickets 53aa95f382289c25ee847521762edbe7e5da768e 0e5d75657faa7a7cefb3ba8546d2b377e8bee4ed 1ec8be0c5332ef57cf4dbe1b3e96fe25ca4ddf00 some time ago and they were neither accepted nor is there any reason stated why they are unacceptable. I also submitted patch

Re: [fossil-users] Wookoo! Google Code Wiki Syntax in fossil!

On 13 November 2010 11:43, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Here's are full instructions, and they can easily be adapter to other JavaScript-based wiki syntax parsers: Okay, well, almost... the parser is

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil - github-in-a-box

On 12 November 2010 20:53, Jeff Rogers dv...@diphi.com wrote: I was recently skimming over the book 'Producing Open Source Software and it suggests a set of tools that an open source project needs: - web site - mailing lists - version control - bug tracking - real-time chat (from

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

On 15 June 2011 07:55, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: All of these alternative build systems are a PITA on one system or another. If it requires jam, cmake or anything that requires installing prerequisites 9 times out of 10 I won't even try that software unless there is a binary

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

On 15 June 2011 09:47, Twylite twyl...@crypt.co.za wrote: On 09:59 PM, Matt Welland wrote: For fossil you could keep the files generated by autoconf (not the ./configure step but the initialization step) checked in. Then it is just ./configure make install on most systems. For anything weird

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

On 15 June 2011 08:37, Alexander Vladimirov id...@idkfa.org.ru wrote: how abouth this: http://buildconf.brlcad.org A script like that is standard part of many autotoolized projects. In fact, most people can't build an autotoolized project (other than release tarballs with pre-generated configure

Re: [fossil-users] Why you should not shun

2011/10/5 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com: On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:34:06PM -0700, Mike Meyer wrote: On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Erlis Vidal er...@erlisvidal.com wrote: You shun a commit or a file in a commit? Is in fossil the shun generating a different commit? you can

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

On 5 October 2011 20:12, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: That sort of we don't need it, we don't need it mantra is a typical case of the famous Blub paradox. I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of

Re: [fossil-users] Why you should not shun

On 6 October 2011 02:48, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote: On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Michal Suchanek wrote: And when you find an issue with a commit that is some way back in your personal branch it is more logical and easier to review your branch if you append the fix to the commit where

[fossil-users] usability of in-project documentation

hello, while the wiki has its entry in the fossil menu and is easy to find the in-project documentation is not so obvious. As a fossil user I have to read the manual to find the docs at all so I would know. The manual is even quite well explained and almost exhaustive. However, if I were to

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On 3 August 2012 11:23, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote: On Jul 30, 2012, at 19:43 , Gautier DI FOLCO wrote: 2012/7/30 Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com I'd like to see it included, as well! I'd like it too, it will be easier for beginnes (like me!). +1 Why markdown

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On 3 August 2012 12:07, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote: On Aug 3, 2012, at 11:53 , Michal Suchanek wrote: On 3 August 2012 11:23, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote: +1 Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes? Because markdown is a very

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On 3 August 2012 12:26, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote: Note there are JavaScript hacks for interpreting random wiki syntax so you can have markdown interpreted without any direct support in fossil. Note there are good wiki engines out there, so no need for one in Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On 3 August 2012 13:04, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.eu wrote: Hello, On Aug 3, 2012, at 11:53 , Michal Suchanek wrote: Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes? If I understand correctly this question wasn't addressed to me (as a developer of the markdown

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On 3 August 2012 14:02, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.eu wrote: Hello, on Friday 03 August 2012 at 13:41, Michal Suchanek wrote: I have strong objections about all such makups, none is perfect, all have some annoyances, and they are all mutually incompatible. Changing from one

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On 3 August 2012 14:40, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 12:19:01 +0200 Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote: Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes? Because markdown is a very popular one, used by github, and we have

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On 3 August 2012 15:14, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote: On Aug 3, 2012, at 14:57 , Stephan Beal wrote: That said: in several of my fossil wikis i store Google Code format in the wiki and render it client-side. My only point there is that it _is_ currently possible to

Re: [fossil-users] usability of in-project documentation

On 3 August 2012 14:45, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Michal Suchanek I am not opposed to writing patches, and all these issues are quite trivial but I am also aware that some patches are rotting in the fossil tickets for years so I guess patches

Re: [fossil-users] templates (WAS: Re: The future of markdown-in-fossil(

On 3 August 2012 15:39, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote: When user HTML templates are implemented it will be possible to store in the HTML template, presumably as part of configuration that can be replicated

Re: [fossil-users] MIME types in Fossil's document server

On 3 August 2012 15:54, Michael Richter ttmrich...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having a weird problem serving up files in my /doc/tip/*. Some of the files I access through that tree are source files. If the source files are foo.m (Mercury source), fossil serves them up as MIME type text/html and it

Re: [fossil-users] templates (WAS: Re: The future of markdown-in-fossil(

On 3 August 2012 16:03, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote: And how do you prevent malicious code import through synchronization? The same way Windows does, of course: This app comes from god-only-knows where

Re: [fossil-users] templates (WAS: Re: The future of markdown-in-fossil(

On 3 August 2012 16:43, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think that doing this is desirable. fossil status should be fossil status. And i agree entirely, i just posted the idea as a possible extension

Re: [fossil-users] [OT] Who's interested in project management collaboration tools? And...

Hello, On 5 August 2012 03:28, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: where are they and how do I get their attention? Hi Folks, Open source software development involves a lot of distributed collaboration - and I expect that many folks here, like me, are involved in one or

Re: [fossil-users] Time for a new release?

On 6 August 2012 14:14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: It has been a long time since we have done an official release of Fossil with prebuilt binaries. We should probably do another soon. Any objections to making the tip of trunk the next official release (version 1.23)? Given that

Re: [fossil-users] [OT] Who's interested in project management collaboration tools? And...

On 6 August 2012 19:21, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: Michal Suchanek wrote: From the startup side - with like 3 people on the project the contribution of some software for project organization is questionable at best. The overall attitude is geared towards doing stuff

Re: [fossil-users] [OT] Who's interested in project management collaboration tools? And...

On 7 August 2012 20:10, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: Michal Suchanek wrote: On 6 August 2012 19:21, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: My personal observation has been that even with a tiny group, an email containing a list of action items very quickly

Re: [fossil-users] [OT] Who's interested in project management collaboration tools? And...

On 9 August 2012 16:56, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote: On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 08:23:04PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: On 7 August 2012 20:10, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: an email, recipient clicks, opens in browser, icon appears on desktop for future access

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.23

On 11 August 2012 01:33, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:13:06PM +0200, li...@martijn.coppoolse.com wrote: ...but of course, that doesn't contain a link to the download(s). OTOH, why do you need to keep a link to this specific version, once it gets older?

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

Hello I did not try this but I think cloning should not copy shunned artifacts. So you can create a smaller repo by making another clone. HTH Michal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

Hello, On 14 September 2012 14:43, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:54:27AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Of all of the VCSes out there today, surely Git requires

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

On 14 September 2012 15:52, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote: The thing to which promoters of immutable history are blind is that while exact history record of development of particular feature might

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

On 14 September 2012 16:57, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, My two cents: I like phrase *commit jungle* and sometimes would like to revert some commits or re-commit things a bit different. I also suppose that it is not that rare when people commit something by mistake or

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

On 14 September 2012 18:49, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: Wes Freeman freeman@gmail.com wrote: The fact of the matter, though, is you can choose whether you want to use that feature of git or not; you're certainly not forced to use it. Well, you can choose whether or not to use it

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

On 14 September 2012 19:03, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Bill for the explanation. I see private tags as the end result of 'squash' rather than 'edit'. If you have three commits A-B-C and decide to hide B, you will see A-C. And then diff between C-A will show combined commits

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

On 14 September 2012 20:10, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/9/14 Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com: so you do a rebase so that your commits can be applied on top of F and send then for review: A-B-C-D-E-F-X'-Y'-Z' If there are no conflicts between your changes and upstream

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

On 15 September 2012 04:20, Csaba Kos csaba@gmail.com wrote: I think now would be a good time to discuss the possibility of a more generic text conversion framework, i.e. not only UTF16 to UTF8 but also SHIFT-JIS to UTF8, and so on. Also CR+NL to NL conversion could be handled by such

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

On 12 October 2012 00:21, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: I would think that rebasing would do the same number of merges, just that it automates those merges. Yes, that's what rebasing is. Also rebasing based development process keeps branches shallow and the case with commits

Re: [fossil-users] status of TODO list (was Re: comparison with Git)

On 13 October 2012 16:45, Richie Adler richiead...@gmail.com wrote: Richard Hipp escribió: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net mailto:g...@atmarama.net wrote: Now, I'm curious about some of the items from the TODO list

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil design error and possible ways to fix it

On 22 November 2012 14:05, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: (3) Add a use text/plain mark to new check-in comments. Check-in comments (and ticket text) are rendered in text/x-fossil-wiki by default but as text/plain if they contain the new mark. There are a couple of possible ways to add

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil design error and possible ways to fix it

On 22 November 2012 14:35, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/11/22 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: Fossil understands check-in comments and ticket text to be Wiki/HTML. Let's say that the mimetype is text/x-fossil-wiki. This approach worked well for us on CVSTrac (which was where

Re: [fossil-users] Is there a setting to make fossil handle UTF-8 correctly in file names and folder names?

On 28 November 2012 20:56, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Frans van Dunné fr...@southshield.net wrote: Is this a configuration issue? Or can fossil not handle special characters in file and folder names? Fossil is suppose to handle non-ASCII

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

On 31 December 2012 04:41, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: Go back through those 30 posts you mentioned. Go back to the very first one from me. I tried to be concise and wrote just three paragraphs that, IMO, captured what was needed. I certainly

Re: [fossil-users] New skin: Blitz

On 16 March 2015 at 15:13, James Moger james.mo...@gmail.com wrote: I sent DRH a new bundle with some tweaks. - set padding on a instead of li in .mainmenu - adjust font-sizes on diff panels to 1rem, Blitz is 1rem=10px. 0.85rem is too small. - set the timeline checkin-id to lowercase rather

Re: [fossil-users] GitHub question. Was: Git-v-Fossil.

On 14 March 2015 at 18:48, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Richard Hipp on Sat, 14 Mar 2015 00:05:07 -0400: Am I wrong to think that clicking through the changes in a project (not necessarily from the beginning, but from some signification event, say the

Re: [fossil-users] GitHub question. Was: Git-v-Fossil.

On 16 March 2015 at 23:08, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:01:21PM +0100, mario wrote: Social network is a nice metaphor. But it's also just a side-effect of having a data silo. Actually, I think that's the far bigger item. GitHub has managed

Re: [fossil-users] please compile official fossil builds with https support

Hello, On 10 June 2015 at 21:37, Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 6/10/15, Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote: If you are worried that some people don't want the bloat of openssl in their base

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On 2 November 2015 at 18:20, Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 31 October 2015 at 23:33, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: >> > >> > I'll argue

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On 2 November 2015 at 20:20, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 11/2/15, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> In fossil you can have multiple checkouts but there is afaik no >> in-fossil tool to jump between them > > The "cd" command

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

g without the sink and it *does* stink when you get anywhere near it unless you go out of your way to make that U-shape with plain pipes. On 2 November 2015 at 20:40, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 11/2/15, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> when

Re: [fossil-users] SHA1 and security

On 30 October 2015 at 00:32, Eduard wrote: > Hi Warren, > > On 10/29/2015 06:50 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> On Oct 29, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Eduard wrote: >>> On 10/29/2015 02:46 PM, Warren Young wrote: (...) >>> I had read 2/3 of

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On 30 October 2015 at 23:19, Warren Young wrote: > On Oct 30, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Scott Doctor wrote: >> >> Embarcadero RAD Studio incorporates Git, Mercurial, and Subversion into the >> IDE. > > Yes, it would be nicer if more IDEs had Fossil plugins. > >

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On 3 November 2015 at 22:31, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Nov 3, 2015, at 5:59 AM, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Note that detached head state is impossible in Fossil and in most >>> other VCSs. (Unsure about Hg.) >&

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On 31 October 2015 at 23:33, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 10/31/15, Matt Welland wrote: >> >> Regarding git, other than it's arcane interface (i) the you are paying in >> learning curve for the additional power that comes from the extra degrees >> of freedom

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On 10 September 2015 at 15:17, j. van den hoff wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:05:09 +0200, Stephan Beal > wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Baruch Burstein >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:12 PM, j.

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On 10 September 2015 at 16:54, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:29:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> On 10 September 2015 at 15:17, j. van den hoff >> <veedeeh...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, 10 Sep 20

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On 16 September 2015 at 05:16, Scott Robison wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> >> On Sep 15, 2015, at 7:01 PM, Scott Robison >> wrote: >> > >> > I think calling it a non sequitur is not completely

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On 11 September 2015 at 17:13, Noam Postavsky <npost...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 10 September 2015 at 19:23, Noam Postavsky >> <npost...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >>

Re: [fossil-users] problems with links in embedded documents

On 23 November 2015 at 22:59, Ron W wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> That's all well and good, but Joerg is right - it would be convenient >> to be able to specify the root of the repository in a hyperlink. I've >>