On Aug 10, 2018, at 4:05 PM, Ron W wrote:
>
> I recall some discussion about adding fsuser support to Fossil
Yes, it was checked in years ago. See src/fusefs.c.
Getting FUSE working on Windows is reportedly difficult, however:
https://superuser.com/q/179436/14927
> so this could be
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:47 PM
wrote:
> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 13:26:04 -0500
> From: Artur Shepilko
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?
>
> > project they are working on. Then they use TortoiseSVN to (mostly) commit
> > changes to their documents,
On 07/08/2018 20:12, Stephan Beal wrote:
That time frame is familiar to me, so i had to check... a couple
timeline entries mention his use of libfossil, and late 2014 was when
chronic RSI knocked me out of my hobby projects (which included
libfossil).
Too bad no one read, willing and able
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:15 PM Donald Griggs wrote:
> Re: http://www.tortoisefossil.org/index.cgi/index "What you'll find
> here is a work in progress "
>
> Unfortunately, it appears the project is at least on hiatus, if not
> abandoned. The last code commit in the timeline was in late
On 07/08/2018 16:14, Donald Griggs wrote:
Re: http://www.tortoisefossil.org/index.cgi/index "What you'll
find here is a work in progress "
Unfortunately, it appears the project is at least on hiatus, if not
abandoned. The last code commit in the timeline was in late 2014.
It's a known
Re: http://www.tortoisefossil.org/index.cgi/index "What you'll find
here is a work in progress "
Unfortunately, it appears the project is at least on hiatus, if not
abandoned. The last code commit in the timeline was in late 2014.
>
>
___
Does it work?
"What you'll find here is a work in progress to have a Tortoise-style
tool for Fossil repositories. Currently there is no release just yet,
there are no commands implemented as of right now, but file overlays are
working great."
http://www.tortoisefossil.org/index.cgi/index
On
Hmmm, that sounds like TortoiseFossil?
I would deploy that if available. :)
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On 07/08/2018 03:21, Ron W wrote:
>
> I never tried Sharp Fossil, but Fuel was a very clunky GUI. I think
> non-programmers would be unwilling to put up with it.
>
> As a
On 07/08/2018 03:21, Ron W wrote:
I never tried Sharp Fossil, but Fuel was a very clunky GUI. I think
non-programmers would be unwilling to put up with it.
As a simpler alternative, the "GUI" could just be implemented as an
extension to Windows Explorer, where users would just right-click a
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:57 PM
wrote:
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:18:09 -0500
> From: Artur Shepilko
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?
> Message-ID:
>
> How would you want to use such a GUI?
> I mean practically what is a non-programmer user wor
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 8:07 AM
wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:18:56 +0800
> From: Steve Landers
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?
>
> Put differently, what can’t you do with “fossil ui” that you can do with a
> native client?
>
You can't d
On Aug 5, 2018, at 2:14 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
> 1. SQLite is a DLL + EXE package
A great many programs have need for an embedded DBMS. Very few programs have
need for an embedded DVCS.
Note also that these are empirical observations, rather than opinions.
> 2. There's no maintained GUI for
How would you want to use such a GUI?
I mean practically what is a non-programmer user workflow that
involves a VCS interaction via GUI?
The reason I ask, is that on several occasions I tried to convince
"ordinary" users to incorporate a VCS into their daily tasks. Not just
Fossil VCS, but Git
On 6 Aug 2018, 9:19 AM +0800, Steve Landers , wrote:
> Put differently, what can’t you do with “fossil ui” that you can do with a
> native client?
>
> Drag and drop is the only one I can think of and I suspect that’s a good
> thing.
And also push notifications. While it can be done with web
I guess that's another reason why there's no desktop UI for fossil.
It's just that I prefer desktop apps to web apps generally, but I can
live with CLI + UI if there's nothing else.
This thread was not meant as criticism; It was just a question.
On 06/08/2018 03:18, Steve Landers wrote:
Put
Put differently, what can’t you do with “fossil ui” that you can do with a
native client?
Drag and drop is the only one I can think of and I suspect that’s a good thing.
-- Steve
On 6 Aug 2018, 9:17 AM +0800, Richard Hipp , wrote:
> On 8/5/18, Gilles wrote:
> > 2. There's no maintained GUI
On 8/5/18, Gilles wrote:
> 2. There's no maintained GUI for Fossil.
I would argue that running "fossil ui" is your GUI.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Thanks for the info, but like 90% of deskop users, I run Windows. I gave
up on deskop Linux, even though I give it a try every year or so just to
check it out.
I'm not arguing. It's just that Fossil is such a great SCM application
that I guess it would benefit even more users if it were
Re Your point (2)
There may not be a GUI for Windows (I don’t use Windows) but there is is a nice
‘Tortoise-like’ GUI for Fossil on macOS - Snail Fossil.
> On 5 Aug 2018, at 21:14, Gilles wrote:
>
> On 05/08/2018 22:02, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> How does adding an extra component and a bunch of
On 05/08/2018 22:02, Richard Hipp wrote:
How does adding an extra component and a bunch of new interfaces make
a program easier to build? I think that the key to building complex
systems is to keep them as simple as possible. If you can omit a
DLL/shared library and all the maintenance and
On 05/08/2018 21:28, Stephan Beal wrote:
Very, very long story very, very short: reimplementing fossil as a
library requires a massive effort.
Too bad. Thanks for the info.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
On 8/5/18, Gilles wrote:
>
> I'm only a casual programmer, but I assume it would have made it easier
> to build a GUI by calling functions within the DLL.
How does adding an extra component and a bunch of new interfaces make
a program easier to build? I think that the key to building complex
22 matches
Mail list logo
