Hello,
on Monday 30 July 2012 at 18:53, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.euwrote:
What remains to do:
+ review my code to ensure it meets fossil level of quality,
+ format it using fossil code style if needed,
+ any other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/2012 10:46 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote:
On 08/03/12 15:42, Stephan Beal wrote:
[---]
Another consideration here is that the wiki has kind of fallen out of use,
[---]
I don't know that that is true. The only proof of this I have seen
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym ala...@snell-pym.org.ukwrote:
I have a fossil repo for my house. The wiki is served up from the home...
i'm willing to bet that that's a use case none of us foresaw.
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
On 08/03/12 15:42, Stephan Beal wrote:
[---]
Another consideration here is that the wiki has kind of fallen out of use,
[---]
I don't know that that is true. The only proof of this I have seen
prior to this thread is that at times it's mentioned that the fossil
repository uses embedded wiki
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jan Danielsson
jan.m.daniels...@gmail.comwrote:
For my part, I use the built in editor/wiki command line on a daily
basis, and it would sadden me greatly if it is depreciated, or if
someone would scrap any ideas of enhancements to it due to the perceived
* Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com [20120803 15:34]:
Another consideration here is that the wiki has kind of fallen out of use,
with the embedded docs system generally being preferred. While i admit that
i pay a good deal of attention to fossil's wiki API (i've added several of
the wiki
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Joan Picanyol i Puig lists-fos...@biaix.org
wrote:
I believe you are underestimating the built-in wiki. As I see it is one
of fossil's killer features: my use case is a dramatically lower barrier
to entry for non-developers contributing to a non-distributed
Hello,
on Monday 30 July 2012 at 18:53, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.euwrote:
What remains to do:
+ review my code to ensure it meets fossil level of quality,
+ format it using fossil code style if needed,
+ any other
On 3 August 2012 11:23, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote:
On Jul 30, 2012, at 19:43 , Gautier DI FOLCO wrote:
2012/7/30 Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com
I'd like to see it included, as well!
I'd like it too, it will be easier for beginnes (like me!).
+1
Why markdown
On Aug 3, 2012, at 11:53 , Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 3 August 2012 11:23, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote:
+1
Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes?
Because markdown is a very popular one, used by github, and we have on board
the creator of a major
On 3 August 2012 12:07, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote:
On Aug 3, 2012, at 11:53 , Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 3 August 2012 11:23, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote:
+1
Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes?
Because markdown is a very
On Aug 3, 2012, at 12:19 , Michal Suchanek wrote:
Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes?
Because markdown is a very popular one, used by github, and we have on board
the creator of a major implementation (the one used by github, iirc).
Github has a cute logo but I
On 3 August 2012 12:26, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote:
Note there are JavaScript hacks for interpreting random wiki syntax so
you can have markdown interpreted without any direct support in
fossil.
Note there are good wiki engines out there, so no need for one in Fossil
Hello,
On Aug 3, 2012, at 11:53 , Michal Suchanek wrote:
Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes?
If I understand correctly this question wasn't addressed to me (as a
developer of the markdown-in-fossil code) but I'll try to contribute as
objectively as I can.
As a
On 3 August 2012 13:04, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.eu wrote:
Hello,
On Aug 3, 2012, at 11:53 , Michal Suchanek wrote:
Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes?
If I understand correctly this question wasn't addressed to me (as a
developer of the
Hello,
on Friday 03 August 2012 at 13:41, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 3 August 2012 13:04, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.eu wrote:
As a user, the killer feature I see for markdown is that the
implementation exists (assuming my code is considered worthy, which is
quite a strong
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 12:19:01 +0200
Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes?
Because markdown is a very popular one, used by github, and we have
on board the creator of a major implementation (the one used by
github, iirc).
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.euwrote:
No problem at all, I'm genuinely that patient. You could tell me nobody
would have time to look at it in 2012, and that would be fine with me
and I wouldn't send any other reminder before end of Januray 2013.
No, no,
On 3 August 2012 14:02, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.eu wrote:
Hello,
on Friday 03 August 2012 at 13:41, Michal Suchanek wrote:
I have strong objections about all such makups, none is perfect, all
have some annoyances, and they are all mutually incompatible.
Changing from one to
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Michal Suchanek
...not to decide that but I have to agree. Once you let in markdown
people used to some other wiki syntax would argue they have needlessly
hard time and there would be no end to the stream of requests to
include yet another.
Hi Michal,
For
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
And given somebody wrote a bbcode parser implementation, moin moin
parser implementation, and a half dozen others which will be allowed
in the fossil proper? Or is parser for any random format to be added?
And now i
On 3 August 2012 14:40, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 12:19:01 +0200
Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes?
Because markdown is a very popular one, used by github, and we have
On 3 August 2012 15:14, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote:
On Aug 3, 2012, at 14:57 , Stephan Beal wrote:
That said: in several of my fossil wikis i store Google Code format in the
wiki and render it client-side. My only point there is that it _is_
currently possible to
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:06:45 +0200
Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Stackoverflow and all the sites under its umbrella, and all the
sites using this engine, use (modified) markdown syntax [1], [2].
So again a somewhat slightly incompatible variation.
Correct, but I hardly
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 14:02:38 +0200
Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.eu wrote:
[...]
As I have said elsewhere, I'm not clever enough to imagine a solution
to introduce markdown into fossil's internal wiki. So I don't propose
it. I propose the extra embedded doc rendering, and the tools to
On 2012-08-03 11:53, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 3 August 2012 11:23, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl
wrote:
On Jul 30, 2012, at 19:43 , Gautier DI FOLCO wrote:
2012/7/30 Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com
I'd like to see it included, as well!
I'd like it too, it will be easier
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I do understand the rationale for this approach; if I were the author
of Fossil (I'm incapable for this, but let's pretend I am, for the
moment) I'd probably pick the same approach during an early phase
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Supposedly, Fossil's wiki page editor could provide the same pick list
the first time a page is created and then persist the chosen markup
syntax with the page entry itself in an appropriate table.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
These pages show 3 page-specified renderers in action (it uses a
name-extension mapper):
That's a lie - each page has a client-specified mime-type string. Click on
the editor button on these pages to see that.
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:42:05 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
I do understand the rationale for this approach; if I were the
author of Fossil (I'm incapable for this, but let's pretend I am,
for the moment) I'd probably pick the same approach during an early
phase of
Michal Suchanek escribió:
Note there are JavaScript hacks for interpreting random wiki syntax so
you can have markdown interpreted without any direct support in
fossil.
Note there are good wiki engines out there, so no need for one in Fossil
too. But once we set the scope to include
Remigiusz Modrzejewski decía, en el mensaje Re: [fossil-users] The future of
markdown-in-fossil del Viernes, 03 de Agosto de 2012 07:26:27:
I've read the we'll have requests for all the markups in the world
argument many times. I can't remember anyone actually coming and asking for
*anything
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.euwrote:
Currently the code is in a new branch off a clone of the official fossil
repository, available at
http://fossil.instinctive.eu/fossil-scm/timeline?r=markdown
Can you please update your fossil binary so that:
Hello,
on Friday 03 August 2012 at 19:11, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.euwrote:
Currently the code is in a new branch off a clone of the official fossil
repository, available at
n Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.comwrote:
Looks like it's using wiki pages, to me, just not stored in the Fossil
wiki -- at least, that what the Editor button tells me... :)
They are actually stored in fossil, but not in the same repo as the
sources. i don't
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.comwrote:
Very slick front-end, BTW!
i appreciate the compliment, but we all know i have no gift for visual
design ;). i had a designer at work help me out with the css, so it doesn't
look half as bad as it originally did, but it
Hello,
I don't want to look impatient, and I personally hate to be constantly
reminded about something that hasn't actually left my mind, so I'm a bit
reluctant to send e-mails like this one. All my apologies if I'm doing
it wrong.
So my point is only to remind you all that I'm still committed
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.euwrote:
What remains to do:
+ review my code to ensure it meets fossil level of quality,
+ format it using fossil code style if needed,
+ any other code change that comes up during the review.
i will be happy to
I'd like to see it included, as well!
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.euwrote:
What remains to do:
+ review my code to ensure it meets fossil level of quality,
+ format it
2012/7/30 Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com
I'd like to see it included, as well!
I'd like it too, it will be easier for beginnes (like me!).
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
On 2012-07-30 10:41, Natacha Porté wrote:
Hello,
I don't want to look impatient, and I personally hate to be
constantly
reminded about something that hasn't actually left my mind, so I'm a
bit
reluctant to send e-mails like this one. All my apologies if I'm
doing
it wrong.
So my point is
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Are we going to move all the wikipages to markdown?
The main repo doesn't use wiki pages any more - the embedded docs feature
is preferred because it's versioned along with the rest of the site. Wikis
_are_ versioned but there is
Looks like it's using wiki pages, to me, just not stored in the Fossil wiki
-- at least, that what the Editor button tells me... :)
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Are we going to move
Very slick front-end, BTW!
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.comwrote:
Looks like it's using wiki pages, to me, just not stored in the Fossil
wiki -- at least, that what the Editor button tells me... :)
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Stephan Beal
44 matches
Mail list logo
