Re: [fossil-users] Look! A git import tool.

2010-03-02 Thread Brian Smith
I've not used svn in ages, but if the need/want arises I might take a stab at it. :) IMO, the easiest way to handle svn repos is to just require a certain layout for the repository. I'm aware of another tool or two that do that. And, if you're in possession of one of those multiple project svn

Re: [fossil-users] Look! A git import tool.

2010-03-03 Thread Brian Smith
Just a quick update. I had a spare hour or so, so, I extended it to support tags. I'm still looking to see about branches. Thanks, -B On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote: I've not used svn in ages, but if the need/want arises I might take a stab

Re: [fossil-users] Look! A git import tool.

2010-03-04 Thread Brian Smith
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:38 PM, D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote: Fossil repositories do not normally need to be vacuumed.  The exception is when they have been newly constructed such as by clone - which vacuums automatically, or by the Git import tool.  (Does that Git import tool vacuum

[fossil-users] SSL verify fails on centos when there's an intermediate certificate involved

2010-03-21 Thread Brian Smith
Hi All, With the patch from ticket http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/45f89e504b, bare SSL syncing now works properly with self-signed certificates. However, Fossil doesn't load the system certificate store on Centos/linux (and probably other *nix type platforms as well). Which means that

[fossil-users] [PATCH!] SSL verify fails on centos when there's an intermediate certificate involved

2010-03-23 Thread Brian Smith
Not to be impatient, just wanted to clarify that there is a patch to fix the issue described here. -B On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote: Hi All, With the patch from ticket http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/45f89e504b, bare SSL syncing now works

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH!] SSL verify fails on centos when there's an intermediate certificate involved

2010-03-23 Thread Brian Smith
- regardless of who produces such a solution or how it's implemented. Thanks, -B On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:09 AM, D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote: On Mar 23, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Brian Smith wrote: Not to be impatient, just wanted to clarify that there is a patch to fix the issue described here

[fossil-users] [PATCH] Reimplementation of the reconstruct command that went missing

2010-07-11 Thread Brian Smith
Hi All, During the move from GPL to BSD, the 'reconstruct' command went missing. I assume this was due to licensing issues. I've re-implemented it, since, my git-import tool depends on it. This implementation is black box. I've not examined the original source for reconstruct at all. At the

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] Reimplementation of the reconstruct command that went missing

2010-07-27 Thread Brian Smith
Hi, I've created the following ticket for this patch: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/dfe1fc608a Thanks, -B On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote: Hi All, During the move from GPL to BSD, the 'reconstruct' command went missing. I assume

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: ssh:// sync method

2010-08-25 Thread Brian Smith
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: The latest version of Fossil (in the self-hosting Fossil repository - not the precompiled binaries which are a little too old) supports a new method of pushing, pulling, cloning, and syncing using SSH.  Examples: fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Multiple repo setup getting Internal Server Error on Linux

2010-09-23 Thread Brian Smith
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Joshua Paine jos...@letterblock.com wrote: On 09/23/2010 01:42 PM, Arnel Legaspi wrote: Dr. Hipp, some of our developer guys wanted me to ask if there are any plans in the future to create anything that would allow them to convert Subversion repos over to

Re: [fossil-users] New TH1 command: wikicontent

2010-10-07 Thread Brian Smith
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Wolfgang rat...@stumvolls.de wrote: Brian Smith br...@... writes:  : TH1 usage: 'wikicontent WIKIPAGE_NAME FALLBACK_TEXT' The command returns the contents of a wiki page (presently, only real wiki pages, not embedded docs), or FALLBACK_TEXT, if the page

Re: [fossil-users] demo of jsonized timeline

2011-01-28 Thread Brian Smith
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Joshua Paine jos

Re: [fossil-users] demo of jsonized timeline

2011-01-28 Thread Brian Smith
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote: My point in all this being that having the column list seems unnecessary. Adding in output for a small minority of users/usecases doesn't seem

Re: [fossil-users] ticket lists over json working

2011-01-28 Thread Brian Smith
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Sorry for all the noise tonight/this morning, but i'm on a hacking high... How's this for tickets info? stephan@ludo:~/cvs/fossil/fossil-sgb$ ./fossil tick list reports Available reports: report number    report

Re: [fossil-users] Deploying A Web Application with Fossil and FTP

2011-02-04 Thread Brian Smith
For some personal sites, what I do is I actually have the fossil repo opened in the web directory. It's .htaccess'd off so that you can't get at it, even if you know it's there. Then, I've got a cronjob that once every 15 minutes does a 'fossil update release'. Where 'release' is just a tag that

Re: [fossil-users] Deploying A Web Application with Fossil and FTP

2011-02-04 Thread Brian Smith
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Mike Meyer mwm-keyword-fossil.1d1...@mired.org wrote: On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:44:18 -0800 Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote: For some personal sites, what I do is I actually have the fossil repo opened in the web directory. It's .htaccess'd off so that you

Re: [fossil-users] is it possible, using th1, to set/expand variables in wiki pages?

2011-04-15 Thread Brian Smith
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: Are you asking how to update all your wiki pages, or just replace the markers when a wiki page is displayed? Just to replace them. e.g. at the

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil not removing files when switching branches

2011-07-13 Thread Brian Smith
I might suggest amending the help command to list commonly used commands by default, and a new switch --all that will display the uncommon ones (such as close). -B On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Joshua Paine jos...@letterblock.com wrote: On 7/13/2011 3:45 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: My

Re: [fossil-users] UnQL?

2011-07-29 Thread Brian Smith
If you read the second link that Stephan provided you'll find that Fossil may use SQLite as it's backing store, but it's actually a distributed NoSQL database in it's operation. -B On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Brian Cottingham spiffyt...@gmail.com wrote: You sure jumped on that story fast!

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Brian Smith
I read a paper awhile back that talked about the minimum distance necessary being 40 something, but I believe that eas in ciexyz colorspace. On Aug 26, 2011 12:39 PM, Joshua Paine jos...@letterblock.com wrote: On 8/26/2011 3:11 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: It *could* be a feature, not a bug.. I

Re: [fossil-users] delete a branch

2011-09-30 Thread Brian Smith
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/branching.wiki On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Erlis Vidal er...@erlisvidal.com wrote: Hi all, thanks for the answers, maybe I'm approaching fossil from the git side. Maybe I have a misconception. In Git a branch is just a pointer to a given

Re: [fossil-users] feature list?

2011-10-21 Thread Brian Smith
If I understand you correctly, Such a feature would seem to be very difficult to implement in fossil, since fossil records that information as tags on commits and doing that would necessitate either rewriting history (bad!), or to rewrite the information as its being unpacked and leave it

Re: [fossil-users] limited push/pull/clone/sync operations (Was: Re: feature list?)

2011-10-22 Thread Brian Smith
be used administratively to make sure that dead branches don't get reopened without good reason. Ok, time for sleep, -B On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote: If I understand you correctly, Such a feature would seem to be very difficult to implement in fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil Repository Does Not Exist Error

2011-10-28 Thread Brian Smith
There's a test-move-repository command that does just this. Perhaps it should be promoted to a proper command. On Oct 28, 2011 8:49 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:00:41 -0700 Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: I usually open the

Re: [fossil-users] Authentication via URL

2011-11-22 Thread Brian Smith
It works because it's not sent as HTTP Basic when cloning. Fossil sends it in it's own 'Card' format. The password is sent hashed and nonced (though I forget the exact details of the exchange.) Which means it's actually a bit better than Basic authentication. -B On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:38 AM,

Re: [fossil-users] Derived code, not to be pushed public

2012-02-16 Thread Brian Smith
For what it's worth, I was working on limited branch syncing awhile back. I never got around to merging it back into the master fossil repo, but, I think at least your use case is functional.. http://code.linuxfood.net/pub/repo/fossil-limsync I really ought to finish that up and push it into

Re: [fossil-users] Derived code, not to be pushed public

2012-02-19 Thread Brian Smith
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:15, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote: For what it's worth, I was working on limited branch syncing awhile back. I never got around to merging it back into the master fossil repo, but, I

Re: [fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

2012-02-29 Thread Brian Smith
I haven't spent any time with the JSON API, but, a very quick thought: It's possible for a check-in to have more than one parent. I assume you model that. Would it be worth while to change parentUuid to parents for the sake of consistency with the tags attribute? -B On Wednesday, February

Re: [fossil-users] feature proposal: explicitly public branches

2012-02-29 Thread Brian Smith
? Going by what Brian Smith has written, it's a question of having time do work on it and handling a few special cases. Brian, if you need any kind of assistance, please let us know. I really want this feature. I also offered my help to Brian in limsync testing. Right now

Re: [fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

2012-02-29 Thread Brian Smith
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net (mailto:br...@linuxfood.net) wrote: I haven't spent any time with the JSON API, but, a very quick thought: It's possible for a check-in to have more than one

Re: [fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

2012-02-29 Thread Brian Smith
is the primary parent. Thanks go to Brian Smith for catching this oversight., mtime:1330551559, parents:[ef561ed0a56a45a23ebf4f1cef6abbed8c98d38d], tags:[trunk] }] } } Documenting that change revealed a happy accident: parentUuid was (by accident

Re: [fossil-users] feature proposal: explicitly public branches

2012-02-29 Thread Brian Smith
pull --tag release=v1.0 So that you could theoretically create repositories that only track tags with specific values? That's it for now. As I put my head back into the code, I'm sure I'll come up with other questions. -B On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Brian Smith wrote: Hi

Re: [fossil-users] feature proposal: explicitly public branches

2012-03-01 Thread Brian Smith
what this would imply. The JSON API is a separate interface, that IIRC doesn't have push/pull capabilities yet. Ostensibly, any addition of push/pull capabilities should mirror the existing functionality. --Leo-- P.S. Sorry for top-posting. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 21:32, Brian Smith br

Re: [fossil-users] Pulling and pushing branches based on tags?

2012-03-14 Thread Brian Smith
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Christopher Berardi cbera...@natoufa.comwrote: A thought that occurred to me that would be a nice feature to compliment our hopefully forthcoming per-branch push/pull implementation is the ability to do the same, but using a branch tag as the key. Take the

Re: [fossil-users] List of checkins

2012-05-26 Thread Brian Smith
Another way, just to add to the list: echo -e .mode csv\nselect uuid from event, blob where event.objid=blob.rid and type='ci' and mtime julianday('2012-05-27'); | fsl sqlite -B On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:49 AM,

Re: [fossil-users] Update of checkout after push operations.

2012-06-14 Thread Brian Smith
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:42 PM, John Found johnfo...@evrocom.net wrote: On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:36:23 +0200 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Looking at your last script, everything looks fine to me. i'm out

Re: [fossil-users] Update of checkout after push operations.

2012-06-14 Thread Brian Smith
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:55 PM, John Found johnfo...@evrocom.net wrote: On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:01:23 -0700 Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote: If I may chime in - if you do not need the updates to be _instantaneous_ upon push... A cronjob scheduled to run once a minute and simply run

Re: [fossil-users] Update of checkout after push operations.

2012-06-14 Thread Brian Smith
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:06 PM, John Found johnfo...@evrocom.net wrote: On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:42:48 -0700 Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote: I had success with this line to execute fossil: /usr/bin/env -i HOME=$(pwd) /usr/local/bin/fossil ls 21 It runs fossil with the same success

Re: [fossil-users] bundles

2013-10-21 Thread Brian Smith
On Oct 21, 2013 10:09 AM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Tom Hines tom_hi...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello. I'm a big fan of fossil and would like to use it, but it's missing one feature that I need. Something equivalent to Mercurial's bundle. A bundle is a