Why hurt Muslims' feelings with creative expressions such as
Islamofascists?
Why hurt Richard's feelings for his use of an innocuous political term? That
term has no more stigma than calling someone a Democrat. You say labels
hurt, yet had no problem trying to label Richard as an ahole.
: general publication quiestion)
To: Daniel Emory [EMAIL PROTECTED],Framers List
framers@FrameUsers.com
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii
snip
Don't get me wrong -- I'm a huge fan of the US military (especially when
they're killing Islamofascists
>Why hurt Muslims' feelings with creative expressions such as
>Islamofascists?
Why hurt Richard's feelings for his use of an innocuous political term? That
term has no more stigma than calling someone a Democrat. You say labels
hurt, yet had no problem trying to label Richard as an ahole.
t: OT: MIL specs (was RE: general publication quiestion)
To: "Daniel Emory" ,"Framers List"
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii"
Don't get me wrong -- I'm a huge fan of the US military (especially when
they're killing Islamofascist
Maybe we should change it to "This page intentionally left almost
completely blank," to be more technically accurate :)
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
052-763-7133
Combs, Richard wrote:
Daniel Emory wrote:
Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for preparing
commercial manuals.
Your snip below deleted from my original post the
main reason I gave for why intentionally blank pages
should be unambiguously labeled. The snipped part was:
The fact that, more and more, technical manuals are
being delivered as computer files, not professionally
printed and bound paper
Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for
preparing commercial manuals. I do know, however, that
most tech writers who produce manuals for commercial
products remain blissfully unaware of the problems
caused by their outputs.
Unlike typical users of commercial products, most
users of
Daniel Emory wrote:
Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for preparing
commercial manuals. I do know, however, that most tech
writers who produce manuals for commercial products remain
blissfully unaware of the problems caused by their outputs.
A valid point. Although some
, Pennsylvania 15238
Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/18/2006 11:44 AM
To: framers@frameusers.com
cc:
Subject:Re: general publication quiestion
Too often readers will suspect that there was a printing error if
there isn't SOME content
Daniel Emory wrote:
--- Charles Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, and then again, maybe I'm not.
I too have
always considered it a strange paradox when I see the words
This page
intentionally left blank. But there is no need to use it.
Daniel Emory wrote:
> The fact is that the US military is the only true laboratory
> where technical documentation is subjected to extensive
> post-publication review to determine its effectiveness in the
> real world. Findings resulting from analyses of actual
> foul-ups lead to continuing
Daniel Emory wrote:
> Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for preparing
> commercial manuals. I do know, however, that most tech
> writers who produce manuals for commercial products remain
> blissfully unaware of the problems caused by their outputs.
A valid point. Although
Susan Curtzwiler wrote:
Hi all, Is there any hard and fast rule that when you have a blank
left page before a chapter break that you have to label it as This
page intentionally left blank. ?
I just put a small version of the company logo at the end of the text of
each chapter. Then it's
The short answer is no, no more than for any other book. Blank pages
are expected and accepted in books that use the convention of starting
chapters on right pages.
I think the labels started being used years ago when military and
mil-spec manuals were issued and updated with change pages.
14 matches
Mail list logo
