I wasn't around for the OOB version, so I don't know how much work needed to be
done for the initial setup; I just know by anecdote that maintenance for both
was apparently a PITA for the person responsible.
> On March 13, 2014 at 2:33 PM Robert Lauriston wrote:
>
>
> Are you speaking specificall
etty straightforward to find the source of any problems.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
> gr...@hedgewizard.net
>
Are you speaking specifically about PDF there? I found the web help
stationery usable pretty much out of the box.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:47 AM, gr...@hedgewizard.net
wrote:
> ePub is quite good at creating PDFs, but there are a couple of caveats:
...
> Finally: It takes quite a while to get t
...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of gr...@hedgewizard.net
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:48 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: FM 12 + RH 11 OR WebWorks ePublisher
ePub is quite good at creating PDFs, but there are a couple of caveats:
1. It does not work on a remote Citrix desktop. (I
t; From: "gr...@hedgewizard.net"
>To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
>Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:47:54 AM
>Subject: Re: FM 12 + RH 11 OR WebWorks ePublisher
>
>
>
>ePub is quite good at creating PDFs, but there are a couple of caveats:
>1. It does not work on a remote Ci
ePub is quite good at creating PDFs, but there are a couple of caveats:
1. It does not work on a remote Citrix desktop. (I suspect that it might have
problems with others, but have no experience with them)
2. It *really* wants a modern system with lots of RAM (>8GB ) and drive space.
It will work
ed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:51 PM, hessiansx4 wrote:
> Thanks for your comments, which I will share with my team.
>
> In answer to your questions Robert: we have ATCS 5 (FM 12, RH 11) installed.
> I'm working on creating a FM template. We currently output to .pdf (from
> Word - ugh) an
Thanks for your comments, which I will share with my team.
In answer to your questions Robert: we have ATCS 5 (FM 12, RH 11) installed.
I'm working on creating a FM template. We currently output to .pdf (from Word -
ugh) and webhelp (from RH). We'd like to output to responsive html
What are you using now? An earlier version of FrameMaker?
FM12 basically has most of RoboHelp folded in so you get two for one.
To see what you'd lose with only RoboHelp, generate a PDF from
RoboHelp and compare it with one saved from FrameMaker. Note that
FrameMaker can save PDF with change mark
drew.com/robocolumn/>) as he's a
RH Server user for his feedback. Several people on the forums have used GA in
their WebHelp.
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of hessiansx4
Sent: March-11-14 7:25 PM
To: Framers
Subject: F
My boss is asking me to provide a justification for using FM12 (which now
outputs webhelp and responsive html5) as a single-source for our webhelp (as
opposed to using only RH or importing FM into RH). Has anyone had experience
with any of these methods in ATCS 5? If so, I'd love to hear about
11 matches
Mail list logo
