Quark does not
seem to have features for creating books which makes making a global
change in the document very difficult.
Quark, InDesign, and FrameMaker all have a similar book feature.
There are differences in what they can sync however, based on what features
they provide. For example,
> Quark does not
> seem to have features for creating books which makes making a global
> change in the document very difficult.
Quark, InDesign, and FrameMaker all have a similar book feature.
There are differences in what they can sync however, based on what features
they provide. For example,
I have a client who has just been acquired. They want me to rebrand their
technical documentation (currently in Word) to comply with their new brand. I
suggested FrameMaker, but they are pushing Quark. I alway thought of Quark as
more appropriate for designers that do brochures, etc.
Has
Actually that is not strictly correct. There are a wide range of
variables that can be used in QXP for number of defined purposes and
if you are using Quark Tags (somewhat similar in its execution to MIF)
the range is much wider. However the functionality built into it is
not as extensive as
On Linda Lecomte at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/30/07 8:36 AM:
Thanks David. This was helpful and I probably will have more questions. I do
have two right now:
What do you mean by Quark does not do numbered lists or footnotes natively.
Also, is outsourcing this project to you an option. I
] On Behalf Of David
Creamer
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 9:06 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Quark versus FrameMaker
I have a client who has just been acquired. They want me to rebrand
their
technical documentation (currently in Word) to comply with their
new brand. I
, November 29, 2007 8:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Quark versus FrameMaker
Hi Everyone,
I have a client who has just been acquired. They want me to rebrand
their technical documentation (currently in Word) to comply with their
new brand. I suggested FrameMaker, but they are pushing Quark. I alway
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Creamer
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 9:06 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Quark versus FrameMaker
I have a client who has just been acquired. They want me to rebrand their
technical documentation
If I may, a quick question about InDesign. Can InDesign import xml
and have the information act like it does in Frame.
Background:
We use Frame as part of our software we have designed. This software
does marketing and is also able to export and then import into Frame
to create large
Hi Everyone,
I have a client who has just been acquired. They want me to rebrand their
technical documentation (currently in Word) to comply with their new brand. I
suggested FrameMaker, but they are pushing Quark. I alway thought of Quark as
more appropriate for designers that do brochures,
> I have a client who has just been acquired. They want me to rebrand their
> technical documentation (currently in Word) to comply with their new brand. I
> suggested FrameMaker, but they are pushing Quark. I alway thought of Quark as
> more appropriate for designers that do brochures, etc.
>
>
> If I may, a quick question about InDesign. Can InDesign import xml
> and have the information act like it does in Frame.
> Background:
> We use Frame as part of our software we have designed. This software
> does marketing and is also able to export and then import into Frame
> to create large
] On Behalf Of Linda Lecomte
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:56 PM
To: framers at frameusers.com
Subject: Quark versus FrameMaker
Hi Everyone,
I have a client who has just been acquired. They want me to rebrand
their technical documentation (currently in Word) to comply with their
new brand. I suggested
Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of David Creamer
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 9:06 AM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Quark versus FrameMaker
> I have a client who has just been acquired
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of David
> Creamer
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 9:06 AM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Re: Quark versus FrameMaker
>
> > I have a client who has just been
On Linda Lecomte at lecomte at comcast.net wrote on 11/30/07 8:36 AM:
> Thanks David. This was helpful and I probably will have more questions. I do
> have two right now:
> What do you mean by Quark does not do numbered lists or footnotes natively.
> Also, is outsourcing this project to you an
> Actually that is not strictly correct. There are a wide range of
> variables that can be used in QXP for number of defined purposes and
> if you are using Quark Tags (somewhat similar in its execution to MIF)
> the range is much wider. However the functionality built into it is
> not as
Hi Everyone,
I have a client who has just been acquired. They want me to rebrand their
technical documentation (currently in Word) to comply with their new brand. I
suggested FrameMaker, but they are pushing Quark. I alway thought of Quark as
more appropriate for designers that do brochures,
18 matches
Mail list logo
