I can't resist either. I must bring closure to part of this thread, just
in case somebody has a time machine accident or stumbles into a worm-hole
and finds themself back in 1986. :-)
There were several ways to eject a disk on a Mac.
1) Select the disk icon and choose Put Away.
2) Select the disk
n...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Kelly
McDaniel
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 5:54 AM
To: Jeremy H. Griffith; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Usage of WebWorks (ePublisher)
"If the client is merely trying to save money by using a "fre
True. At least not until I get a bag of marshmallows and a pointed stick. =D
*scampers off*
Nadine
> And you *don't* want to get me started... ;-)
>
> -- Jeremy H. Griffith, at Omni Systems Inc.
> http://www.omsys.com/
>
>
___
You are curren
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:15:42 -0400, Writer
wrote:
>Tell us another story from the old days, Grandpa.
>
>Nadine, who also could not resist ;-)
LOL! Actually, I may get to be a great-grandpa soon, if my
grandson gets married as young as I did...
And you *don't* want to get me started... ;-)
Tell us another story from the old days, Grandpa.
Nadine, who also could not resist ;-)
Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:32:12 -0600, Patrick Fortino
> wrote:
>
>
>> But imagine it's 1986 and you are in a computer store looking at
>> computers.
>>
>
> I can't resist.
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:32:12 -0600, Patrick Fortino
wrote:
>But imagine it's 1986 and you are in a computer store looking at
>computers.
I can't resist. ;-) In 1986, I was working at a company that
had pretty much standardized on Macs. People loved them. I had
one of the older DOS boxes, w
I'd second David's opinion and experience.
And as a beneficiary of one of Jeremy's free licenses during the last
tech crunch, it gave me a new tool and skill set and resulted in a
steady string of license purchases from companies that I've worked for
since then.
Good product, great support, and e
Patrick,
My opinion, and experience, with Mif2Go is just the opposite.
I have been using Mif2Go for several years and have learned how to use the
User's Guide. Yes, it takes a while to find things, sometimes, but this is
because Mif2Go can do a lot.
If you install Mif2Go and just take the default
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:37:06 -0500 (CDT), Nancy Allison
wrote:
>Jeremy, do you really mean it? I would be thrilled.
Of course I mean it! The next two posts will contain
the password and download instructions. (But we won't
CC the list with those, sorry folks! If you're an
unemployed TW, or
Just charge "them" the time you spend (waste) on doing the job without the
right tools. I'm sure you will come up with a figure which is a multiple of
the price of MIF2Go (or even WebWorks ePublisher). Both MIF2Go and WebWorks
ePublisher are GREAT value for money.
There is no such thing as a free
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Nancy Allison wrote:
> I see so many things I could make so much better if I had the time and the
> right tools, but alas, it is not to be.
>
> But wait! Jeremy wrote:
>
>> If the client is merely trying to save money by using a
>> "free" tool, we'll *give* her a
Jeremy wrote:
> I just checked in the FM7 book Sarah O'Keefe wrote, and it
> appears Webworks *Standard*, the one Nancy was "required"
> to use, does not even support HTML Help at all. You'd have
> to use the regular HTML output, then create the index, toc,
> project file, alias and map files by
com on behalf of Jeremy H. Griffith
Sent: Thu 4/16/2009 6:46 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Usage of WebWorks (ePublisher)
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:13:06 -0400, Jim Owens wrote:
>Nancy mentioned that her client insists on Webworks 7, so all other
>options are moot.
>
&
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:13:06 -0400, Jim Owens wrote:
>Nancy mentioned that her client insists on Webworks 7, so all other
>options are moot.
>
>Without knowing anything about the situation, I'd still venture that
>it's not in her client's interest to use something that's been
>discontinued. Ca
Nancy mentioned that her client insists on Webworks 7, so all other
options are moot.
Without knowing anything about the situation, I'd still venture that
it's not in her client's interest to use something that's been
discontinued. Can they be talked into a more sensible decision?
Joseph Lore
Hi Nancy,
I would recommend purchasing the technical communications suite 2.0 and then
using RoboHelp to create your help system. RoboHelp has built-in
functionality to import FrameMaker books directly into RoboHelp projects and
then generate HTML files from the Frame files in the book. I have d
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.
Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com.
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/
I second John's views, and to some extent Zoe's. Mif2GO is a great tool,
and it's priced right. If you want to pay a lot more, you could consider
ePublisher. People seem to like it, and XML-based publishing is
definitely the way of the future.
WWP 7 Standard Edition is obsolete. Don't waste you
pull that one off (and it meets my expectations
of how it should work), we'll eat like kings (*nyuck*).
Nadine
--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Zoe Lawson wrote:
> From: Zoe Lawson
> Subject: Re: Usage of WebWorks (ePublisher)
> To: "Nancy Allison"
> Cc: fram...@frameusers.com
To the best of my knowledge, help conversion tools produced by the
Quadralay/Webworks company (they've rebranded, and I never remember what their
'real' name is) are still in common use.
However, I do not believe that Quadralay/Webworks is really actively supporting
7.0 that much (or if they ar
We abandoned WebWorks in favor of Mif2Go a couple of years ago. Mif2Go can do
more things and is much cheaper. It doesn't look as slick and was harder to
learn to the 80% mark, but WebWorks always had some bizarre things that I never
did get used to.
Mif2Go has awesome support, which WebWorks ne
WW hasn't shipped with Frame for two releases; the publishers have
changed the name and product significantly with ePublisher. And as far
as Standard WW goes, it doesn't support modified templates, so it's of
limited usefulness. And I don't think it was ever in common use -- it
was a freebie from a
22 matches
Mail list logo
