>Not tagged. Never do that.
Tagged PDFs should be used unless there is a problem with using the setting.
They are required for PDF reviews, 508 accessibility, Acrobat editing and
export*.
*Non-tagged PDFs tend to treat each line as a separate paragraph, while
tagged PDFs "remember" the paragraph
I have found that RTF is a much more robust and dependable format than Word
.docx format. No surprise there.
We always used Tags in PDF, so we have a relatively seamless exchange in
formats.
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 12:57, Böðvar Björgvinsson wrote:
>
> Mike,
> Thanks. Good to know! :-)
>
> Bo
Mike,
Thanks. Good to know! :-)
Bodvar
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Mike Wickham wrote:
> If you're going to convert to Word from PDF, you might want to used tagged
> PDF for the conversion. Original PDF was not interested in the data, only
> its position. PDFs purpose is page layout. T
If you're going to convert to Word from PDF, you might want to used
tagged PDF for the conversion. Original PDF was not interested in the
data, only its position. PDFs purpose is page layout. The idea of PDF is
to create a document that looks exactly the same on every computer
screen, with no c
Mike,
Not tagged. Never do that.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Mike Wickham wrote:
> Bodvar,
>
> It might depend on whether the PDF was saved as tagged PDF or not.
>
> Mike Wickham
>
> On 4/17/2018 12:35 PM, Böðvar Björgvinsson wrote:
>
>> Peter Gold,
>> pdf-ed by printing book from FM 2
Bodvar,
It might depend on whether the PDF was saved as tagged PDF or not.
Mike Wickham
On 4/17/2018 12:35 PM, Böðvar Björgvinsson wrote:
Peter Gold,
pdf-ed by printing book from FM 2013 to file, then distilling. In Acrobat
Save as Word. My only guess is that this font is a bit more exaggerate
Peter Gold,
pdf-ed by printing book from FM 2013 to file, then distilling. In Acrobat
Save as Word. My only guess is that this font is a bit more exaggerated
serif than the standard Times (etc.) and the font size was only 10 pt.
Also, it seemed to create a text frame on each page for the contents.
This reminds me of a story I heard back when edlin, an early text editor
had been left in the dust by newer tools. Allegedly, an engineer wrote a
60-page document using edlin, since it was the only tool he knew then. It
just proves that stick-to-it-ness has some value.
As to one-word-per-line, hmm
I just tried to save a 200 page pdf to Word in Acrobat X Pro and almost all
word spaces disappeared (10pt/14 Esprit font), so I had just one very long
word for each line, more or less. Saving to rtf worked fine and I was able
to spellcheck my Icelandic (not supported by FM yet) document in
LibreOff
PDF to Word works, mostly.
I was surprised the conversion of a 57MB PDF file successfully converted to
Word.
Graphics get scrambled however, so give a warning.
I have a few SMEs who want a Word version to mark up. Ugh.
I get comments about how bad the graphics are all the time...
Jeff
++
Ma
Major limitation, you can't save a whole book to RTF, only an
individual .fm file.
___
This message is from the Framers mailing list
Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com
Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com
Archives located a
Sometimes people ask for Word so they can give comments.
But this would not be to convert files, just to get comments
I
בתאריך יום ב׳, 16 באפר׳ 2018, 18:09, מאת Robert Lauriston <
rob...@lauriston.com>:
> FrameMaker by itself can't export to Word. You might get better Word
> output by linking
Get the full version of Acrobat too.
TCS is the best way to go. Includes both and other tools that may be
useful, but which you don't know you need yet because it's a new gig.
Art Campbell
art.campb...@gmail.com
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent an
Behalf Of Robert Lauriston
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 10:09 AM
To: An email list for people using Adobe FrameMaker software.
Subject: Re: [Framers] Frame alone or Adobe too?
FrameMaker by itself can't export to Word. You might get better Word output by
linking a FrameMaker project to R
FrameMaker can save as RTF, which can be opened in Word and saved as
Word. Close enough.
-j
On 2018-04-16 17:09, Robert Lauriston wrote:
FrameMaker by itself can't export to Word. You might get better Word
output by linking a FrameMaker project to RoboHelp than by saving as
PDF and then saving
FrameMaker by itself can't export to Word. You might get better Word
output by linking a FrameMaker project to RoboHelp than by saving as
PDF and then saving as Word from Acrobat.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Carrie Baker wrote:
> Thanks.
> So you cannot enable the pdf for commenting without
Thanks.
So you cannot enable the pdf for commenting without the full suite?
And how about export to Word from PDF, do you get that from the subset?
In my previous position I had the full suite, so that is why I am asking
בתאריך יום ב׳, 16 באפר׳ 2018, 17:49, מאת Robert Lauriston <
rob...@lauriston
FrameMaker, which includes a subset of Acrobat and RoboHelp features,
is $1000. The PDF settings let you specify the start page:
https://help.adobe.com/en_US/framemaker/2017/using/using-framemaker-2017/frm_generating_output/Configure_PDF_settings-.htm
For $1700, you can get Adobe Technical Commun
FM right out of the box includes a version of Acrobat that's commonly called
"headless" - you don't get the full functionality of Acrobat exposed & I
believe you can't send jobs to PDF from any other applications either.
Generally, you want the full Acrobat Pro version.
-Original Message---
Depends on what your output from Frame is. If it is PDF printed docs, then yes,
get Acrobat.
OTOH, if your output is something else, get whatever you need to polish/adjust
that output.
-Original Message-
From: Framers
[mailto:framers-bounces+john.x.posada=us.hsbc@lists.frameusers.c
20 matches
Mail list logo