On Dec 23, 2007, at 01:31 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
The PLIP also mentions a better RSS portlet. I won't be able to do
that, but rumour is that Wichert has done it in the feedmixer
portlet already. Is that correct? If not, do we have any other
volunteers?
Feedmixer is a better RSS
Geir Bækholt · Jarn wrote:
On Dec 23, 2007, at 01:31 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
The PLIP also mentions a better RSS portlet. I won't be able to do
that, but rumour is that Wichert has done it in the feedmixer
portlet already. Is that correct? If not, do we have any other
volunteers?
On 23 dec 2007, at 01:31, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi guys,
PLIP 184 is about adding new portlets. I've got two covered and
mostly complete:
- plone.portlet.static[1] provides static text with a Kupu widget
- plone.portlet.collection[2] provides a listing based on a collection
Is it an
Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
On 23 dec 2007, at 01:31, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi guys,
PLIP 184 is about adding new portlets. I've got two covered and
mostly complete:
- plone.portlet.static[1] provides static text with a Kupu widget
- plone.portlet.collection[2] provides a listing based on a
On Dec 23, 2007 1:50 PM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it an idea that this collection portlet has some kind of next/
previous functionality that uses kss and ajax to get the next batch
inside the portlet? With kss this is almost trivial and it enhances
the UX of the thing.
I
Previously Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Dec 23, 2007 1:50 PM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it an idea that this collection portlet has some kind of next/
previous functionality that uses kss and ajax to get the next batch
inside the portlet? With kss this is almost trivial and
On Dec 22, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
here's a first summary of all votes cast so far by the framework
team on selection particular plips for inclusion into plone 3.1:
all but one of the remaining votes have been casted in the meantime,
so it's time for an update:
#184:
hi all,
the framework team has voted on all PLIPs submitted for inclusion into
Plone 3.1. it's taken a bit longer than planned, and we'd like
apologize for the delay. the following PLIPs have been accepted:
#184: Include more/improved portlets
#187: Working Out-of-the-box WebDAV
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..]
* Rapahel on #187
please also try to cast those asap. that said, how long do we want to
wait for those missing votes and do we have a plan on how to proceed
if they don't arrive? i'd suggest waiting until midnight tonight at
most, i.e. one day, and then
On Dec 23, 2007, at 12:47 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..]
* Rapahel on #187
please also try to cast those asap. that said, how long do we
want to wait for those missing votes and do we have a plan on how
to proceed if they don't arrive? i'd suggest waiting
Ho ho ho,
I'd like to officially submit for consideration for Plone 3.1 a bundle
that comprises the following PLIPs (in separate packages):
- PLIP 184 - additional portlets (has a dependency on PLIP 200)
- PLIP 200 - Kupu formlib widget
- PLIP 203 - Portlet assignments and blocking
To be clear, I believe the only -1 vote on #187 was primarily due to
some concerns about the shortage of detail in the PLIP text. A
concern I share. I'm hoping Sidnei fleshes out the details soon. :-)
I would gladly answer any questions. The PLIP doesn't have much detail
because there ain't
Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
After having waded through a big pile of plips I often (as a less
technical oriented member) had problems determining what the actual
usecase was that it was trying to solve. I would like to suggest (when
thechcnically possible) to add such a section in a plip. I'd
I've created a buildout for evaluating PLIP #187 at:
http://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/dreamcatcher-plip187/
More information on the status over here:
http://awkly.org/2007/12/24/preparing-plip-187-for-review/
Summary:
At this point, it should be possible to checkout the buildout,
14 matches
Mail list logo
