Here are the details for the conf call today. Let's skip the Skype
version unless everyone agrees to use it and go for the call in number
listed below.
Cheers,
Calvin
Plone Framework Team Meeting Meeting Details:
Meeting Description: Plone 4 is well on its way out of the gate and
I'd
Hi Calvin.
Thanks for taking the initiative here.
I'll not gonna make it to todays tune-up nor the conf call, though :(
Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
The next one is this Friday and I'd suggest that we meet at 17:00 GMT.
I'll send out Yugma conference info so we can share desktops if needed.
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu
writes:
Thanks for taking the initiative here.
I'll not gonna make it to todays tune-up nor the conf call, though :(
Four of us (calvinhp, ErikRose, ErikRose, zenwryly) made it to the
meeting and came up with a few things to act on. I'll briefly
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
The last item concerned future meetings. When should we do this
meeting in the future? Every other week or every third work?
Thursday? Friday? Would all of the FWT members weigh in with both
preferences and outright scheduling conflicts for
On Mar 13, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Ross Patterson wrote:
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
The last item concerned future meetings. When should we do this
meeting in the future? Every other week or every third work?
Thursday? Friday? Would all of the FWT members weigh in with both
Thanks for the excellent summary!
Previously Ross Patterson wrote:
The last item concerned future meetings. When should we do this meeting
in the future? Every other week or every third work? Thursday?
Friday? Would all of the FWT members weigh in with both preferences and
outright
On Mar 13, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
Mr. Wilkes, can you post the link to that scheduling software that
you mentioned on the call? We can setup a mock week and basically
vote on which days/times work best.
Sorry, sent from the wrong address and it didn't get
Ross Patterson wrote:
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu
writes:
Four of us (calvinhp, ErikRose, ErikRose, zenwryly) made it to the
meeting and came up with a few things to act on. I'll briefly describe
them here so we can discuss.
Awesome!
Some of the discussion centered around
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
I've tried to include all the relevant possible times in this, let me
know if there's another I should add.
I'll be at PyCon in that week and have no idea what my time schedule is
going to be. I'll try to join on whatever time others agree.
In general I'll be on vacation
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu
writes:
So far, much of the Plone 4 work has happened in narrower circles to
free it up for prototyping, visioning, and imagining new approaches.
This has been in part to isolate such a process from the paralysis that
can come from discussion of edge
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu
writes:
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
I've tried to include all the relevant possible times in this, let me
know if there's another I should add.
I'll be at PyCon in that week and have no idea what my time schedule is
going to be. I'll try to join on whatever
I'll also be at PyCon, we can have a real face to face meeting :-)
Cal
On Mar 13, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
I've tried to include all the relevant possible times in this, let me
know if there's another I should add.
I'll be at PyCon in that week and
On Mar 13, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Ross Patterson wrote:
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu
writes:
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
I've tried to include all the relevant possible times in this, let
me
know if there's another I should add.
I'll be at PyCon in that week and have no idea what my time
On 13 Mar 2009, at 19:30, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
I've tried to include all the relevant possible times in this, let me
know if there's another I should add.
I'll be at PyCon in that week and have no idea what my time schedule
is
going to be. I'll try to join on
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 13 Mar 2009, at 19:30, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
I've tried to include all the relevant possible times in this, let me
know if there's another I should add.
I'll be at PyCon in that week and have no idea what my time schedule is
going to be.
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
So far, much of the Plone 4 work has happened in narrower circles to
free it up for prototyping, visioning, and imagining new approaches.
This has been in part to isolate such a process from the paralysis
that can come from discussion of edge
Jon Stahl j...@onenw.org writes:
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
So far, much of the Plone 4 work has happened in narrower circles to
free it up for prototyping, visioning, and imagining new approaches.
This has been in part to isolate such a process from the paralysis
that
East coast... summer... Ugh. :)
East coast is significantly easier for the Europeans, both in travel
time and intensity of jetlag. But all is open to discussion. They
rallied to CA for the PSPS. :-)
:jon
___
Framework-Team mailing list
I think this is a fantastic idea! Count me in for helping.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Jon Stahl j...@onenw.org wrote:
East coast... summer... Ugh. :)
East coast is significantly easier for the Europeans, both in travel
time and intensity of jetlag. But all is open to discussion.
Jon Stahl j...@onenw.org writes:
East coast... summer... Ugh. :)
East coast is significantly easier for the Europeans, both in travel
time and intensity of jetlag. But all is open to discussion. They
rallied to CA for the PSPS. :-)
Just to be clear that was an utterly petty response
On 14 Mar 2009, at 00:13, Jon Stahl wrote:
East coast is significantly easier for the Europeans, both in travel
time and intensity of jetlag. But all is open to discussion. They
rallied to CA for the PSPS. :-)
To be honest, the travel time isn't a massive factor, it only adds a
few
21 matches
Mail list logo
