Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote: > The only other concern I recall is the potential breakage > of backup routines. > If someone just rsyncs/copies Data.fs via cron (or the like) > it will miss the binary data after the upgrade. We are migrating the types to use blobs in any c

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-27 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/27/10 10:03 , Raphael Ritz wrote: > David Glick wrote: >>> [..] >> If I recall, the main risks are that the migration may take a long >> time, and that the admin may not have properly configured blob-storage >> in their buildout. The migration

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-27 Thread Raphael Ritz
David Glick wrote: >> [..] > If I recall, the main risks are that the migration may take a long > time, and that the admin may not have properly configured blob-storage > in their buildout. The migration itself is pretty well-tested, at > least under Plone 3 -- Groundwire has migrated dozens of

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-26 Thread David Glick
On 5/26/10 7:25 PM, Alexander Limi wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Hanno Schlichting > wrote: > > Why wouldn't we want to migrate content by default? If we don't do it > by default, only a few will figure out how to do it and people loose > the majo

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-26 Thread Alexander Limi
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > Why wouldn't we want to migrate content by default? If we don't do it > by default, only a few will figure out how to do it and people loose > the major advantage that blobs give them. > > I haven't been involved in the PLIP discussions

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote: > i haven't looked at the changeset itself ((In [36715]) Add upgrade step to > convert all files and images to blobs.), but it sounds like the automatic > blob-migration we didn't want to enforce.  existing file and image content > should rem

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-26 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On 23.05.2010, at 17:09, Hanno Schlichting wrote: #10365 / #10366 - @@blob-file-migration fails on migrated site I fixed both of these today - but they are in desperate need of testing on real world data sets :) i haven't looked at the changeset itself ((In [36715]) Add upgrade step to con

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-23 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: >>> #10365 / #10366 - @@blob-file-migration fails on migrated site >>> #10549 - Uncaught NotFound exception in plone.app.linkintegrity when page >>> contains some @@{view} links > > I fixed both of these today - but they are in desperate n

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-23 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:00 PM, David Glick wrote: > On 5/20/10 12:58 PM, Eric Steele wrote: >> The main issues I'd like to see fixed and released before we move to RC are: >> >> #10124 - should remove Large Plone Folder type and expose the folder >> ordering setting in the schema >> > I have s

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-21 Thread David Glick
On 5/20/10 12:58 PM, Eric Steele wrote: > The main issues I'd like to see fixed and released before we move to RC are: > > #10549 - Uncaught NotFound exception in plone.app.linkintegrity when page > contains some @@{view} links > Fixed. -- David Glick Web Developer Groundwire 206.286.1235x32 d

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-21 Thread Maurits van Rees
Op 20-05-10 22:00, David Glick schreef: > On 5/20/10 12:58 PM, Eric Steele wrote: >> The main issues I'd like to see fixed and released before we move to RC are: >> >> #10124 - should remove Large Plone Folder type and expose the folder >> ordering setting in the schema >> > I have started working

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-20 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Steele wrote: > So let's move the b4 release to June 2, which should give us time to > get the majority of these wrapped up (and provide me with the time to > actually cut the release). At that point, I'll take another look at > what's remainin

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-20 Thread David Glick
On 5/20/10 12:58 PM, Eric Steele wrote: > The main issues I'd like to see fixed and released before we move to RC are: > > #10124 - should remove Large Plone Folder type and expose the folder ordering > setting in the schema > I have started working on this one. > #10360 - Incomplete migration:

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases

2010-05-20 Thread Eric Steele
I need to do some backtracking on my previous release plans... First and foremost, I've completely overestimated the time I'd have available this week. Preparing for next week's symposium has eaten all of my available time and I'll be unable to cut a b4 beforehand. I absolutely hate being the p