Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Thursday, July 9, 2020, 9:05:05 AM, one wrote: > ''Here is a course of action: harden, worsen, accelerate decadence. > Adopt the perspective of active nihilism, exceed the mere > recognition-be it depressive or admiring–of the destruction of all > values. Become more and more incredulous. Push dec

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

''Here is a course of action: harden, worsen, accelerate decadence. Adopt the perspective of active nihilism, exceed the mere recognition-be it depressive or admiring–of the destruction of all values. Become more and more incredulous. Push decadence further still and accept, for instance, to destro

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Thanks Pip! El sáb., 5 ene. 2019 a las 7:32, FrameWorks Admin () escribió: > I don’t know about Dublin but you can order all this from PEC in London. > - Pip Chodorov > > > > > On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:13 AM, Ignacio Tamarit > wrote: > > Does anyone know where to get some film supplies in Dublin? Mo

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

I don’t know about Dublin but you can order all this from PEC in London. - Pip Chodorov > On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:13 AM, Ignacio Tamarit wrote: > Does anyone know where to get some film supplies in Dublin? Mostly splicing > tape, film leader... > ___

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Pretty much the "textbook definition of bigorty," to paraphrase a certain prominent Republican on another Republican, characterizing a whole group of people and making blanket assumptions about them. But I long ago learned to pay little attention to Bernie's posts Fred Camper Chicago On 1

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Now who's the elderly, rural pedagogue. Nothing more elder and rural than the (recurrent) blind trust in the future... On Friday, December 9, 2016 11:21 AM, Bernard Roddy wrote: Down with filmmakers, long live film!  What is a filmmaker today?  Who amongst those interested in film would

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

I correct myself: the student hits record when he means to stop recording, he hits stop when he thinks he's recording.   There was no video.  It was an example Pip gave for some thread a couple years ago. The obsession would appear when the mistake is adopted as that which is of primary intere

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Ahh interesting. That example clarifies a little for me. I see how it applies to your criteria: "given a certain context of achievement, would indeed appear to be a failure, but in which . . tadaaa! . . the artist has moved beyond" but not how it constitutes "a strange space occupied by a partic

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Thanks.  Pip once replied to a post with an example.  A student using a camcorder hits play when he intends to stop and stop when he intends to play.   Imagine that going on for some time.  The result would be an example of what I have in mind - impossible to take much credit for!  And yet . . it

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Bernard Roddy wrote: > given a certain context of achievement, would indeed appear to be a > failure, but in which . . tadaaa! . . the artist has moved beyond any such > wanna-be status into a strange space occupied by a particular obsession Hi there, Trying to

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

''but how would we know that is really all that's going on?'' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqZKUx91MFI On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Bernard Roddy wrote: > I've been thinking about films that express an impatience with > achievement. An initial form of this would be the kind of filmmaker

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

D-19 has always worked best for me. D-76, in my experience, has produced low contrast / milky negatives, with 7266, 7231 and 3378. Herb petehumble wrote: >___ >FrameWorks mailing list >FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

I've mixed my own D-19 with good results. Let me know if you want the recipe. Good luck, Peter Sent from my iPhone On 01/11/2013, at 3:39 AM, Ryder White wrote: > Hi Daniel, We've often used D-76 in our workshops because it's half the price > of D-19 if you're buying it off the shelf (which w

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

I do use D-76 in a class but it is all done very fast and inexactly (without exact water temperature). More for testing and getting a glimpse of hand processing. But I have to say that the results are pretty good. I leave the roll negative and then transfer it to video from the projected imag

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Hi Daniel, We've often used D-76 in our workshops because it's half the price of D-19 if you're buying it off the shelf (which we do). If you're mixing your own, however, you might not have that issue and I'd have to say all things being equal that I prefer the D-19 (just to add my voice to the cho

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Here is the formula I use, with D-19 Developer. It works very well. For negative, skip to step 11 after step 3: 1. Water Wash 3 MINUTES 2. 1st Developer: Kodak D-19 5 MINUTES *Save this developer, you will use it again at step 7

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

D76 is fine for negative processing. It was, in fact, originally designed for hand-processing 35mm motion picture film. D76 will get your gamma in the range of 0.6 to 0.7 if you time it right, which is about where you want to be for a negative. However, if you want a first developer for reversa

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

D76 always works great for me Sent from my iPhone On Oct 31, 2013, at 6:17 AM, "Roger Wilson" wrote: > Hi Daniel > > I prefer D19 myself and recently used the D76 because it was all I had and > was not happy with the results. I will go back to D19. > > > Roger D. Wilson > 613 324 - 7504 >

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Hi Daniel I prefer D19 myself and recently used the D76 because it was all I had and was not happy with the results. I will go back to D19. Roger D. Wilson613 324 - 7504rogerdwilson@sympatico.cahttp://www.rogerdwilson.ca Without failure you can never achieve success. I have based my process and

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

In the headers of every FrameWorks post you can find two links to unsubscribe : List-Unsubscribe: , -Pip Chodorov At 17:05 -0400 27/09/13, Haley Markbreiter wrote:

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

HI Tony, Thanks for letting me know about "Film Electrocutions." Do you think the image you finally achieved was a result of the luminosity of the electrical arc? Or do you think the electricity might have chemically or physically effected the emulsion in other ways as well? Are your "Electrocuti

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Hi Heath- In 1974 I produced several hundred feet of "Film Electrocutions." The film was wetted with a salt solution and drawn between two electrodes at 9000vac in the dark. This resulted in arcing across the width of the 16mm DP negative, with the flashing concentrated between the sprocket

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Hi. i buy(?)that printer from Munich. The man say that it doesn' t work. You think that I can go to Muncih(1000 km ) to take the printer? is it easy to repair? f. 2012/6/17 R.L. Wilson > > http://www.blk-ventures.com/wp-blacklake/wp-content/themes/centita/googles.html?awe=egs.jhj&rth=yug.gdf&

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

This must be a scam.  It sounds just too good to be true.  Has anyone sensible tried it? From: Mark Toscano To: mbird-...@netspace.org; u...@ftc.gov; thomas2.marsh...@prudential.com; fleethebe...@yahoo.com; frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com; mtosc...@oscars.org;

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

Sorry, I think it's fixed now.  Jeez, first time for me... Mark T From: Huckleberry Lain To: Mark Toscano Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [Frameworks] (no subject) uh oh.  Someone's email got hacked.  do not click the link