Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg? and early working 35mm HOLMES projector

2017-11-03 Thread Holcus Ltd
p Chodorov Sent: 22 October 2017 15:41 To: Experimental Film Discussion List Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg? Hi Esperanza, I once asked my lab if I could make tape splices. The New York lab said sure. The Paris lab said no but they allowed me to make tape splices leaving an extra frame

Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg?

2017-10-22 Thread Eddy Falconer
John sounds right to me. I had heard mostly of workprints always, too. On Oct 22, 2017 5:44 PM, "Jeff Kreines" wrote: > I’m surprised that no one has mentioned workprint. Most films were > edited using workprints, a print off the uncut negative — and once that > was “locked” the negative was c

Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg?

2017-10-22 Thread Jeff Kreines
I’m surprised that no one has mentioned workprint. Most films were edited using workprints, a print off the uncut negative — and once that was “locked” the negative was conformed. While some did edit original negatives, it was usually for speed — done in the early newsreel days, and in early T

Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg?

2017-10-22 Thread Christopher Ball
Yes, and based on experience, if you get one frame out of sync somewhere its a nightmare to fix!   Original Message   From: djte...@gmail.com Sent: October 22, 2017 5:54 PM To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com Reply-to: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg? I

Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg?

2017-10-22 Thread Dave Tetzlaff
I wouldn’t suggest conforming any negative you care about yourself unless you have plenty of experience both with handling negative and with a glue splicer. Any dust or whatever that gets on the neg will show up in the print. It takes technique to scrape just the right amount of emulsion off cor

Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg?

2017-10-22 Thread Esperanza Collado
Interesting to know this. Thanks Pip, for bringing it out. I'll make sure I ask my lab, as I actually don't have any cement equipment (yet). Good to know it's affordable too! 2017-10-22 17:01 GMT+02:00 Scott Dorsey : > The Bell and Howell printers will mostly pass tape splices, but they always >

Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg?

2017-10-22 Thread Scott Dorsey
The Bell and Howell printers will mostly pass tape splices, but they always have a little registration problem when the splice goes over, even if you add a few frames of slop. You can do it... I once conformed a 400 foot documentary entirely with a Presstape splicer (very very bad idea). But for

Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg?

2017-10-22 Thread Pip Chodorov
Hi Esperanza, I once asked my lab if I could make tape splices. The New York lab said sure. The Paris lab said no but they allowed me to make tape splices leaving an extra frame on either side of my cut which they cut off and replaced with a cement splice. In that way you get to do the creativ

Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg?

2017-10-22 Thread Esperanza Collado
Thank you, Scott. Your indications couldn't be more clear. 2017-10-22 14:35 GMT+02:00 Scott Dorsey : > Yes, the neg needs to be cut in order. You can cut it with scenes simply > in > order (and cement splice it). If you do this you will see a line on the > screen > at each cut. The better way

Re: [Frameworks] Editing neg?

2017-10-22 Thread Scott Dorsey
Yes, the neg needs to be cut in order. You can cut it with scenes simply in order (and cement splice it). If you do this you will see a line on the screen at each cut. The better way to do this is to A-B roll, that is to make two rolls with a checkerboard pattern with scenes alternating with bla