One of my e-mails got delivered out of sequence which is causing some
confusion
On 18 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
>> There isn't such a solution -- anytime that a program communicates to
>> a library via the C++ interface (vtable) both programs need to be
>> compiled with the same compiler. The C
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 02:33:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 18 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
> > And, like I stated earlier, I don't know understand why we shouldn't.
> >
> > -Scott
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 03:17:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> I still say we should use the
On 18 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
> And, like I stated earlier, I don't know understand why we shouldn't.
>
> -Scott
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 03:17:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I still say we should use the C++ interface... all our other plugins do...
Simple, the C++ interface is curre
And, like I stated earlier, I don't know understand why we shouldn't.
-Scott
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 03:17:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I still say we should use the C++ interface... all our other plugins do...
>
> elrod
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On 18 A
I think what rob would like is for us to be able to install id3lib on the
users machine and any other program would be able to use the same copy for
their id3lib needs. this is ideal but realistically not that many apps
will actually need it... it is not like the core runtime libs or
anything...
I still say we should use the C++ interface... all our other plugins do...
elrod
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 18 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
> > If it is possible, I'd prefer to use the C++ interface, for now. I'm not very
> > knowledgable about developing for windows, and know
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 01:37:46PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 18 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
> > If it is possible, I'd prefer to use the C++ interface, for now. I'm not very
> > knowledgable about developing for windows, and know little of its limitations
> > as far as dll's go. Someone el
On 18 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
> If it is possible, I'd prefer to use the C++ interface, for now. I'm not very
> knowledgable about developing for windows, and know little of its limitations
> as far as dll's go. Someone else wrote the dll interface, so I'm not terribly
> familiar with it. So if
If it is possible, I'd prefer to use the C++ interface, for now. I'm not very
knowledgable about developing for windows, and know little of its limitations
as far as dll's go. Someone else wrote the dll interface, so I'm not terribly
familiar with it. So if there's a solution which allows us to
If I were you I would just use the C++ stuff. We will just install the id3lib.dll
into our program dir and not the system dir. That way only we will use it and we
will be compiled against it with the same compiler.. no problems...
elrod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 18 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
>
On 18 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 11:36:14AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On 17 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
>>
>> The one request that I have at this point is for you to create an rpm
>> that we can bundle/link from the freeamp page. I'm trying our source
>> distro to keep f
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 11:36:14AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 17 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
>
> The one request that I have at this point is for you to create an rpm
> that we can bundle/link from the freeamp page. I'm trying our source
> distro to keep from ballooning in size so I don't wa
do you need the .lib file as well then?
elrod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 17 Apr, Mark B. Elrod wrote:
> > what about win32? I don't want people to have to go out and find libs.
>
> For Win32 I have included the headers and the actual .DLL and into the
> FreeAmp source base. This way the supp
On 17 Apr, Mark B. Elrod wrote:
> what about win32? I don't want people to have to go out and find libs.
For Win32 I have included the headers and the actual .DLL and into the
FreeAmp source base. This way the support will be built in.
--ruaok Freezerburn! All else is only icing. -- Sou
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 12:08:47PM -0700, Mark B. Elrod wrote:
> what about win32? I don't want people to have to go out and find libs.
>
> elrod
>
If someone wants to compile and package the id3lib win32 libs in a manner that
will be most useful for windows users, I will gladly make them avail
what about win32? I don't want people to have to go out and find libs.
elrod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 17 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
>
> > Cool! Let me know if I can help you in any way. The id3lib interface isn't a
> > work of art, but I've kept it pretty much as it was from 3.05a to ease th
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 11:36:14AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 17 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
>
> The one request that I have at this point is for you to create an rpm
> that we can bundle/link from the freeamp page. I'm trying our source
> distro to keep from ballooning in size so I don't wa
On 17 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
> Cool! Let me know if I can help you in any way. The id3lib interface isn't a
> work of art, but I've kept it pretty much as it was from 3.05a to ease the
> transition of those who still might be using it. The docs are also lacking,
> but they're improving. Also,
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 09:39:25AM -0700, Mayhem & Chaos Coordinator wrote:
> > I had heard remours that, starting with version 2.1, freeamp was planning
> on
> > using id3lib for its tagging needs. If this is not the case, please let
> me
> > know. If this is the case, I'd like to briefly take
> I had heard remours that, starting with version 2.1, freeamp was planning
on
> using id3lib for its tagging needs. If this is not the case, please let
me
> know. If this is the case, I'd like to briefly take this opportunity to
> [snip]
> You'll notice that I've listed freeamp as a project tha
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 10:03:11AM -0500, Scott Haug wrote:
> I had heard remours that, starting with version 2.1, freeamp was planning on
^^^
Ugh. Sorry. Make that rumours.
-Scott
--
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freeamp.org/ma
I had heard remours that, starting with version 2.1, freeamp was planning on
using id3lib for its tagging needs. If this is not the case, please let me
know. If this is the case, I'd like to briefly take this opportunity to
announce the first official release of id3lib since version 3.05a (Nov 1
22 matches
Mail list logo
