Well, i'm not sure about 5.0's new funky support (i
mean, if it supports the SB Live, who knows), but in
the past, PCI modems have never been supported,
because they all tend to be win modems (only MS
windows drivers available). I'd advise possibly an
external modem. (Hey, they're probably still
David,
I emailed my details on what I have done on two machines that are
exhibiting this problem. Because these machines are different in
their hardware and have not expressed the problem in the past, I
dont think its a hardware issue.
Before the new binutils both machines did not have this
Hi!
I have the code of an ATM driver for FreeBSD 2.2
I would like to port it to FreeBSD 4.0
What cautions should I have?
When I tried to compile the code, I got a warning:
"Don't #include ioctl.h in the kernel. Include xxxio.h instead."
So I did it.
Then an error:
...
: MAKING
Well, i'm not sure about 5.0's new funky support (i
mean, if it supports the SB Live, who knows), but in
the past, PCI modems have never been supported,
because they all tend to be win modems (only MS
windows drivers available). I'd advise possibly an
external modem. (Hey, they're probably
I don't know that what the actual modem is inside. The system is a Compaq
Presario 1200.
I am waiting for the compaq restore CD to reinstall the windows side to
figure out what really on here. (Needs a compaq driver?)
John
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Archie Cobbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Brian Somers writes:
Also (Mark sits beside me at work), is there anyone else out there
that actually runs FreeBSD-current under VMWare (irrespective of the
host OS) ?
This problem has now been traced down to a bug in the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Archie Cobbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Brian Somers writes:
Also (Mark sits beside me at work), is there anyone else out there
that actually runs FreeBSD-current under VMWare (irrespective of the
host OS) ?
This problem has now been traced down to a bug
I've only just fixed one problem in RAID-5 revive, and another one has
surfaced. For the moment: if you have a RAID-5 plex with a dead
subdisk, leave it that way. It's safer than restarting it. I think I
should have it fixed relatively quickly. Watch this space.
Greg
--
Finger [EMAIL