Re: /boot partition?

2000-10-14 Thread Mike Meyer
Maxim Sobolev writes: "Michael C . Wu" wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 07:22:20AM -0500, Mike Meyer scribbled: | Just curious - now that the kernel has moved into /boot/kernel/kernel, | does anyone know how well would it work to put /boot in it's own | partition (possibly in it's own

Re: pcmcia and ed

2000-10-14 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Warner Losh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): The module name should be if_ed. I'll go fix it. Did you do this already? And if so, where? I'd love to know. Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-14 Thread Leif Neland
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: The following changes have been made in -CURRENT: 1. mail.local(8) is no longer installed as a set-user-id binary. If you are using a /etc/mail/sendmail.cf from the default sendmail.cf included with FreeBSD any time after 3.1.0,

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-14 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
leifn Is there a way to make make world use my own sendmail.mc? There will be soon. I hope to have it in place before or during BSDcon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Recent thread changes

2000-10-14 Thread jdp
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just committed some changes to the threads library and would appreciate feedback from anyone running threaded applications. They include fixes that -stable could really use. This commit also implements zero

Re: modules again non-shareable?

2000-10-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 08:38:34PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: would that nullfs worked! It does, modulo remaining bugs which Boris hasnt yet fixed. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: /boot partition?

2000-10-14 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:39 -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: [ ... separate /boot partition ... ] Since you implied a question... This is a standard setup for Linux, so Linux people dealing with problems with the root file system try and make it work in -stable (with no luck). The best

Re: removing global from tree

2000-10-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:01:59AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: In revision 1.148 of src/usr.bin/Makefile, the hook for building global was removed. This was 3.5 month ago. Is it time to move src/contrib/global and src/usr.bin/global into the attic? Wow, that is still there. I forgot about

Re: removing global from tree

2000-10-14 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: I didn't put it in the Attic when I disconnected it from the build in case someone came forward screaming about removing it. I figured it was much easier to back out a Makefile commit than get things from the Attic back to being

Re: removing global from tree

2000-10-14 Thread John Baldwin
On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote: On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: I didn't put it in the Attic when I disconnected it from the build in case someone came forward screaming about removing it. I figured it was much easier to back out a Makefile commit than get

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-14 Thread Peter Wemm
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: leifn Is there a way to make make world use my own sendmail.mc? There will be soon. I hope to have it in place before or during BSDcon. Yes, there has been one for ages. Add: "SENDMAIL_CF= myfile.cf" to /etc/make.conf, and the sendmail makefiles will build it

Re: Recent thread changes

2000-10-14 Thread jdp
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The range of valid priorities has also changed, perhaps requiring a library version bump. The

cvs-cur snapshots have stopped again.

2000-10-14 Thread Stephen Hocking
Could someone please restart them? Stephen -- The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor. "We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the Complete Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true."

Re: removing global from tree

2000-10-14 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:16 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote: Up to now I always thought "the Attic" is something CVS itself takes care of when "cvs rm"ing files. What's that special thing needing manual intervention or special attention you've been

Our kernel just got too big again. :)

2000-10-14 Thread Jordan Hubbard
(CDT) (envelope-from root) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 08:50:54 -0500 (CDT) From: USW2 Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: -current build report for Sat Oct 14 02:07:34 CDT 2000 Doing nightly build attempt for 5.0-20001014-CURRENT at Sat Oct 14 02

Re: Our kernel just got too big again. :)

2000-10-14 Thread Jordan Hubbard
I had asked for a 3rd floppy earlier that we could put f/w images and other That sounds nice in theory, but somebody needs to write the code which deals with floppy switching and module loading before this is anything but yet another request. How's your forth? :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe:

Re: Our kernel just got too big again. :)

2000-10-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 01:54:39PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: We've blown out the kern.flp image. Time for me to chop something out again, unless there are any other suggestions. :| Mind if I commit this patch? Index: dokern.sh

Re: removing global from tree

2000-10-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 10:32:11PM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote: Backing out an rm'ed file should be as difficult as doing the sequence I just tested to make sure: F=toberemoved.txt Coming up with the "F" list can be more than just ``ls -R /home/ncvs/src/contrib/global'' as older versions

Re: removing global from tree

2000-10-14 Thread John Baldwin
On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote: On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:16 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote: Up to now I always thought "the Attic" is something CVS itself takes care of when "cvs rm"ing files. What's that special thing needing manual intervention

Re: Our kernel just got too big again. :)

2000-10-14 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Hmm?... my forth is poor, but I don't believe that's the issue. If I understand how the floppies currently work is that it's just like our normal boot loader- we start coming up. If you want to load other drivers or modules (like ispfw), you hit the 'other than Enter' to stop the loading

Re: Our kernel just got too big again. :)

2000-10-14 Thread Matthew Jacob
Hmm?... my forth is poor, but I don't believe that's the issue. If I understand how the floppies currently work is that it's just like our normal boot loader- we start coming up. If you want to load other drivers or modules (like ispfw), you hit the 'other than Enter' to stop the loading

Re: pcmcia and ed

2000-10-14 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexander Langer writes: : Thus spake Warner Losh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): : : The module name should be if_ed. I'll go fix it. : : Did you do this already? : : And if so, where? No. I haven't. I just spend a fair amount of time wonking on a current -current

Re: Our kernel just got too big again. :)

2000-10-14 Thread Matthew Jacob
The problem with such an approach is that it's not very user-friendly to first-time installers who have no idea how to drive the loader. Most of the relevant modules can actually be tried by sysinstall. In the CD case we can just put them on the CDROM. I'd be inclined to look for

Re: Our kernel just got too big again. :)

2000-10-14 Thread Tatsumi Hosokawa
At Sat, 14 Oct 2000 13:57:07 -0700 (PDT), Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had asked for a 3rd floppy earlier that we could put f/w images and other drivers on. Now that we have a mostly loadable system, it strikes me that this would be an excellent time to trim down the GENERIC to

system lockups in -current - during boot.

2000-10-14 Thread Mike Meyer
I'm getting hard lockups booting a -current kernel supped about 6 hours ago. If I try to boot multiuser, I get a message about the ethernet interface being configured, and then nothing. If I boot single user, it comes up fine, and I can configure the NIC. The system then locks up maybe 10 seconds

today's -current xl0 wigs out

2000-10-14 Thread Mark Hittinger
Upon an 'ifconfig xl0' the kernel hangs. If I don't ifconfig xl0 I can still use pppd ok. pcib0: Host to PCI bridge at pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: PCI bus on pcib0 pci0: Intel 82371AB Power management controller at 7.3 pci0: S3 ViRGE DX/GX graphics accelerator at 10.0 irq 11 xl0: 3Com

re: today's -current xl0 wigs out

2000-10-14 Thread Mark Hittinger
In if_xl.c at the very beginning of xl_attach() it looks like there is a leftover splimp(). Bill seems to have replaced all the others with a LOCK macro. Further down in xl_attach there is a LOCK macro so maybe we just have to remove that leftover splimp(). Trying that now. Later Mark

Re: Our kernel just got too big again. :)

2000-10-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 01:54:39PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: We've blown out the kern.flp image. Time for me to chop something out again, unless there are any other suggestions. :| Things the Alpha has already diked out: ncr SYS* (not just SYSVMSG) lpt \ ppi / should not be needed for