> > this function)
> > /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c:758: (Each undeclared identifier is reported
> > only once
> > /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c:758: for each function it appears in.)
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Can somebody decide what's right here and let me know? It's blocking
> > buildwor
Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> This has been going on for at least a week for alpha:
>
> cc -O -pipe -mcpu=ev4 -Wall -pedantic -c /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c
> /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c: In function `stat_display':
> /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c:131: warning: ANSI C does not support the `l
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:29:52 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that something is wrong with sscanf(3) in -current - in
> > > some cases it may cause SIGBUS. I failed to reproduce the
> > > pro
This has been going on for at least a week for alpha:
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=ev4 -Wall -pedantic -c /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c
/usr/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c: In function `stat_display':
/usr/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c:131: warning: ANSI C does not support the `ll'
length modifier
/usr/src/usr.b
On Sunday, 3 June 2001 at 16:54:47 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
>>> Could you stick some numbers in here please. How much email does
>>> core@ get ?
>>
>> Normally much less than 10 messages a day.
>
> In Q1 2001, we got 650ish mail messages.
In message <50104.991592939@critter> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: I think you guys should write a short-and-to-the-point application
: and send it to the core team.
Core has had many applications. Sending them to addresses other than
core@ makes it impossible for us to consider the person (unless
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
: > Could you stick some numbers in here please. How much email does
: > core@ get ?
:
: Normally much less than 10 messages a day.
In Q1 2001, we got 650ish mail messages. I'd expect Q2 to be twice
that, but I'd say fully 1/2 of those can b
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>
> > It seems that something is wrong with sscanf(3) in -current - in
> > some cases it may cause SIGBUS. I failed to reproduce the
> > problem on 4-STABLE, so it is a -current specific bug. Attached
> > please fin
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 05:16:41PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
> One final annoyance is that using an alternate superblock will undo
> any changes made by tunefs, unless the '-A' flag had been used with
> tunefs originally. Typically this will result in soft-updates
> getting disabled.
Maybe -A shou
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:44:52PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> The system just hung, and eventually rebooted. I was in X at the time..
> anyways's here's the trace:
And of course the system info (wc is enabled):
Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986,
The system just hung, and eventually rebooted. I was in X at the time..
anyways's here's the trace:
#0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:478
#1 0xc01dbdf3 in boot (howto=260) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:321
#2 0xc01dc265 in panic (fmt=0xc03b6d05 "softdep_lock: lock held by %d")
Darren Reed wrote:
>
>The licence is intended to mean that people can use (which includes modify
>or patch or tune, as seen fit) IPFilter as found within FreeBSD/NetBSD for
>whatever purpose they desire - so long as the conditions (due credit and the
>notice) are met.
>
So, out of curiosity, do
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> It seems that something is wrong with sscanf(3) in -current - in
> some cases it may cause SIGBUS. I failed to reproduce the
> problem on 4-STABLE, so it is a -current specific bug. Attached
> please find small showcase that exposes the bug in question
>
I think you guys should write a short-and-to-the-point application
and send it to the core team.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug D
enault writes:
>I am also interested in doing this
>
>On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> Those of you who have been following the mailing lists will hav
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein wri
tes:
>> Was it determined that the fsck corruption problems which were seen
>> with fsck after the introduction of the dirpref changes do not affect
>> RELENG_4? I haven't seen any MFC of changes to the RELENG_4 fsck
>> code, and I'm kind of wo
Distribution: ipfilter list, FreeBSD & NetBSD developers & current lists.
There is some amount of angst in the user community about what the IPFilter
licence means. This has prompted some rather rash discussions and actions.
Nevertheless, what I'd been led to think was bad (the old licence) isn'
I am also interested in doing this
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
> Those of you who have been following the mailing lists will have
> noticed (or participated in) a thread bemoaning the continued lack of
> feedback from the core team. That thread is still very active, but
> one suggesti
I'm trying to copy files from my linux mounted partition, but it seems on
-CURRENT that it is broken, or perhaps I'm doing something wrong. Is this a
bug with the ext2fs code?
/dev/da1s1a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s1e on /mp3 (ufs, local)
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
linprocfs
I'm having some issues trying to setup a krb5 realm on my -current box.
I'm using the integrated heimdal sources.
Anyway, I'm able to setup the realm correctly but when I try to run the
k5admind daemon, it cores whenever I try to connect to it. I'll look into
building a debug version and try to g
19 matches
Mail list logo
