Terry Lambert wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Kargl wrote:
man send-pr
Yeah; I'd prefer it if send-pr ran under Windows, or of
FreeBSD would support WinModems.
What fails to work for you in the Web Interface at
Terry Lambert wrote:
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
I agree with Kris. These days it is not a big problem, especially for
an opensource project, such as UUCP. Most obvious possibility is a
Sourceforge - it provides all what is necessary (i.e. cvs repo, bug
tracking database, mailing lists, www
On 07-Oct-01 Terry Lambert wrote:
As to the work itself, I have been avoiding it, since we have
a new person at ClickArray whose trial by fire is building
an updated developer workstation release CDROM based on the
FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE plus our heavily modified kernel code,
and our
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Sourceforge is based on the premise that you can create an
Open Source project by declaring one, which is untrue. If
you want my opnions in detail, check the -chat and -advocacy
archives.
I am not sure how this could defeat the fact that you can get a necessary
Just a FYI to people not on the ia64 list...
All bow before Doug Rabson, the mighty! :-)
peter@overcee[11:23am]~src/sys/ia64/compile/SMALL-203# telnet -K ia64
Trying 10.0.0.21...
Connected to ia64.wemm.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
FreeBSD/ia64 (ia64.wemm.org) (ttyp0)
login: peter
Password:
Will this NO_KLD option be commited to
-current and then hopefully -stable?
I have been checking the LINT file each morning
after the nightly cvsup runs hoping to find this
option in there but so far havent seen it in
sight.
Any ideas?
TIA
Holt
If memory serves me right, Peter Wemm wrote:
Connected to ia64.wemm.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
FreeBSD/ia64 (ia64.wemm.org) (ttyp0)
That's totally awesome. Congratulations to all involved!
Now, how long before I need to start worrying about release notes for
the ia64? :-)
Bruce.
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 12:09:41PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
If memory serves me right, Peter Wemm wrote:
Connected to ia64.wemm.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
FreeBSD/ia64 (ia64.wemm.org) (ttyp0)
That's totally awesome. Congratulations to all involved!
Now, how long before I
On Mon, 08 Oct 2001 12:09:41 -0700
Bruce A. Mah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If memory serves me right, Peter Wemm wrote:
Connected to ia64.wemm.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
FreeBSD/ia64 (ia64.wemm.org) (ttyp0)
That's totally awesome. Congratulations to all involved!
Now, how long before
Amusement? Excitement you mean! :-)
That's REALLY a significant milestone and the IA-64 is by no means a
simple architecture to come to grips with. My hat is off (yet again)
to Doug! I think that makes two 64 bit architecture ports he's now
had a lot to do with. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe:
Doug, Peter,
This is great news indeed :-). I assume there's much work to go, but very
cool.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
Just a FYI to people not on the
[moved to -chat, since it has nothing to do with -current]
On Mon, 08 Oct 2001 11:09:06 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Sourceforge is based on the premise that you can create an
Open Source project by declaring one, which is untrue. If
you want my opnions in detail,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 09:32:56PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
Index: gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/i386/kvm-fbsd.c
===
RCS file: /dump/FreeBSD-CVS/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/i386/kvm-fbsd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -r1.27
No, I wan't using linux_kdump, thanks for the education.
Today I've installed linux_kdump from the package on
jp.current.freebsd.org, and now I get
1207 vmware CALL linux_access(0xbfbff759,0x4)
1207 vmware NAMI /compat/linux/home/hunter/gwk/.Xauthority
1207 vmware NAMI
So normally vmware runs setuid root, which means that the 'real' uid and
gid will be the normal user, as opposed to the root user. '0x4' on
FreeBSD would constitute R_OK -- a quick glance at my local Linux box
demonstrates that it has the same meaning there. If you run the 'access'
command
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Wemm wrote:
Just a FYI to people not on the ia64 list...
All bow before Doug Rabson, the mighty! :-)
Great!
acpi0: Intel W460GXBS on motherboard
acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed feature programming model.
Timecounter ACPI frequency 3579545 Hz
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 00:56:44 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
[ I don't particularly want to get involved in this thread...but... ]
Can you explain why the ti(4) driver needs a coalescing patch? It already
has in-firmware coalescing paramters that are tuneable by
* Kenneth D. Merry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011009 00:11] wrote:
As you say above, this is actually a good thing. I don't see how this ties
into the patch to introduce some sort of interrupt coalescing into the
ti(4) driver. IMO, you should be able to tweak the coalescing parameters
on the
* Kenneth D. Merry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011009 00:11] wrote:
As you say above, this is actually a good thing. I don't see how this ties
into the patch to introduce some sort of interrupt coalescing into the
ti(4) driver. IMO, you should be able to tweak the coalescing parameters
on
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 00:18:57 -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Kenneth D. Merry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011009 00:11] wrote:
As you say above, this is actually a good thing. I don't see how this ties
into the patch to introduce some sort of interrupt coalescing into the
ti(4) driver.
* Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011009 00:25] wrote:
* Kenneth D. Merry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011009 00:11] wrote:
As you say above, this is actually a good thing. I don't see how this ties
into the patch to introduce some sort of interrupt coalescing into the
ti(4) driver. IMO,
21 matches
Mail list logo
