Richard Arends wrote:
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
Can somebody, or maybe you, make a list off the perl script in the base
OS, that need to be rewritten??
Of course! :). Done, sent to current@
Perfect...
What is preffered: C, Shell ???
Uh, csh. Preferrably with tcsh
When building /sys/boot on i386 with Gcc 3.1, one gets -96 bytes
available. Anyone want to install the gcc31 port, build /sys/boot with
make CC=gcc31 and try to hack out 96 bytes?
You will need this diff also.
Index: boot2/Makefile
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Uh, csh. Preferrably with tcsh extensions, so it won't run anywhere
else. In a pinch, I guess you could use bash.
As far i can see, (almost?) everything is already moved from perl to
something else. Asked it, went away for a few hours and all the
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 07:16:31PM +0200, Miguel Mendez wrote:
Ports should avoid messing with stuff outside of ${PREFIX} if they can
help it. Existing systems will already have a /usr/bin/perl on them
unless the user goes and removes it. People writing or executing scripts for
new
On 09-May-2002 David O'Brien wrote:
When building /sys/boot on i386 with Gcc 3.1, one gets -96 bytes
available. Anyone want to install the gcc31 port, build /sys/boot with
make CC=gcc31 and try to hack out 96 bytes?
Argh! Can't we go one update of gcc w/o them adding some weird
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:]
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 09:32:10AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
Why?? If someone wants to use perl in building a port, let them.
Add a BUILD_DEPENDS.
Seems like an awful amount of installation if all you are
I had to recover about this amount, before.
The way I ended up doing it was to hack all the strings shorter.
Boots were ugly, but they worked. 8-(.
-- Terry
David O'Brien wrote:
When building /sys/boot on i386 with Gcc 3.1, one gets -96 bytes
available. Anyone want to install the gcc31
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 12:55:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Hi,
Ports should avoid messing with stuff outside of ${PREFIX} if they can
help it. Existing systems will already have a /usr/bin/perl on them
unless the user goes and removes it. People writing or executing scripts for
new
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On 09-May-2002 (15:38:45/GMT) Mark Murray wrote:
I tryed this one. I'm not a committer, just a volunteer :-)
You're on! Please put appropriate (c) on this (Preferably
2-clause BSD license) and I'll commit it for you :-)
Ahemm, I'm not sure to have done correct job. Please review last
On 09-May-2002 (15:38:45/GMT) Mark Murray wrote:
I tryed this one. I'm not a committer, just a volunteer :-)
You're on! Please put appropriate (c) on this (Preferably
2-clause BSD license) and I'll commit it for you :-)
Ahemm, I'm not sure to have done correct job. Please review
Hi
The response to the perl-script rewriting project has been
very hearteningly _fantastic_!
Here is the list as it stands. The gaps are fairly obvious (and
probably mostly not critical in the short term):
/usr/bin/afmtodit
/usr/bin/catman John Rochester [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, then. What is so wrong with /usr/bin/perl being /usr/bin/env perl,
or DES's wrapper?
People just need something to be righteously wroth about. Moving perl
out of the base is no longer open to debate, so they've found another
bikeshed to argue
yppasswd_svc.c: In function 'yppasswdprog_1':
yppasswd_svc.c:100: warning passing arg 1 of '_msgout' discards qualifiers
from pointer target types
***Error code 1
1 error
***Error code 2
1 error
***Error code 2
1 error
***Error code 2
1 error
***Error code 2
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Pawel Worach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any idea?
rpcgen needs to be a bootstrap tool, but isn't. This has been broken
for a long time, just not visibly. Try the attached patch.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: Makefile.inc1
On Wednesday 08 May 2002 09:52 pm, Terry Lambert wrote:
= Mikhail Teterin wrote:
[...]
= The most frustrating thing is, the number of such symbols varies
= greatly with the order, in which I list the libraries on the command
= line. Is not the linker supposed to make several runs over the
Mark Murray wrote:
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To
:]
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:57:00AM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
It would be acceptable to rewrite in C (C++?)
NO! for rewriting in C++. If you do, you'll soon see the consequences.
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
= The most frustrating thing is, the number of such symbols varies
= greatly with the order, in which I list the libraries on the command
= line. Is not the linker supposed to make several runs over the given
= libraries if needed?
=
= No. It doesn't make several
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 05:31:49PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2002 08:24:57 MST, Joseph Scott wrote:
This may sound like an extremely silly little idea, but is there
any reason why we can't just replace /usr/bin/perl with a shell script
that prints out something
Jordan DeLong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems that neither symlink nor redirector is neccesary; portable
perl shebangs use #!/usr/bin/env perl to search $PATH for it, and
if the local sysadmin wants they can make a symlink.
Most Perl scripts use '#!/usr/bin/perl'; also, using a redirector has
At 6:29 PM -0500 5/9/02, Jordan DeLong wrote:
Symlink or redirector, but please not this. :-)
Shouldn't ports *not* touch anything outside of ${PREFIX}?
I, for one, can't stand when ports do that
(except /etc/shells -- that's different).
I agree. That's why a redirector makes more sense,
David O'Brien is in the process of committing gcc-3.1. If you are not
prepared to do your own fixing, now would be a good time to avoid -current.
It is a big task and will take a while to finish, so please be patient!
Cheers,
-Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On 10-May-2002 Peter Wemm wrote:
David O'Brien is in the process of committing gcc-3.1. If you are not
prepared to do your own fixing, now would be a good time to avoid -current.
It is a big task and will take a while to finish, so please be patient!
Cheers,
-Peter
YAY!!
*and
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 07:48:47PM -0700, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
...
/d/home/des/tinderbox/src/kerberos5/lib/libkrb5/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5/acl.c:77:
warning: implicit declaration of function `__va_size'
fixed.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
25 matches
Mail list logo
