Re: panic: malloc(M_WAITOK) returned NULL

2003-01-18 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway writes: I just got the following on axp1: panic: malloc(M_WAITOK) returned NULL db_print_backtrace() at db_print_backtrace+0x18 panic() at panic+0x104 malloc() at malloc+0x1a8 initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1() at initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1+0xc4

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am I the only one who thinks that the error message truncation makes it difficult to see the error? You're right. I implemented truncation to avoid having ten lines turn into fifty due to very long gcc command lines, but I didn't think about error

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: panic: malloc(M_WAITOK) returned NULL

2003-01-18 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Sat, 2003/01/18 at 09:00:39 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway writes: I just got the following on axp1: panic: malloc(M_WAITOK) returned NULL db_print_backtrace() at db_print_backtrace+0x18 panic() at panic+0x104 malloc() at malloc+0x1a8

still problems

2003-01-18 Thread Trish Lynch
I cvsupped to RELENG_5_0 I try to compile a kernel: linking kernel.debug udbp.o: In function `udbp_attach': /admins/src/sys/dev/usb/udbp.c:358: undefined reference to `ng_newtype' /admins/src/sys/dev/usb/udbp.c:364: undefined reference to `ng_make_node_common' /admins/src/sys/dev/usb/udbp.c:367:

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am I the only one who thinks that the error message truncation makes it difficult to see the error? BTW, the complete log is always available in ~des/public_html (and hence on the web: http://people.freebsd.org/~des/{alpha,i386}.log). The full error

Re: some 5.0 oddities

2003-01-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2003-01-18 13:12, Andy Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4/ You can't interrupt the BTX loader anymore. Used to be able to get the ':' prompt before the kernel loaded. I regularly interrupt my loader at any stage. Can you elaborate a bit on this

Re: still problems

2003-01-18 Thread Trish Lynch
Forgoet it, I'm double stupid, I just read the udbp man page :) it requires options NETGRAPH. doh! On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Trish Lynch wrote: I cvsupped to RELENG_5_0 I try to compile a kernel: linking kernel.debug udbp.o: In function `udbp_attach': /admins/src/sys/dev/usb/udbp.c:358:

Re: some 5.0 oddities

2003-01-18 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2003.01.18 13:37:53 +, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: boot2 no longer accepts keyboard input. I'm not sure exactly when this happened, but it was some time late last year. I have -Dh in /boot.config, but sometimes I want to use the vga console instead of the serial console. It used to

Re: bad ACPL asl's on motherboards

2003-01-18 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, David O'Brien wrote: I'm convinced that if we are going to keep insisting that ACPI is enabled by default, we need to gather the various fixed AML's and commit them to the tree. I can't decide if they should be ports, or in /usr/src. What are the copyright issues

Re: How to build -current and install to empty slice?

2003-01-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The first question is a bit tougher. Not at all. Just prepare the slice so that it contains at least an 'a' partition (so you can boot from it), mount the fresh partitions in the correct places in relation to eachother (e.g. ad0s2a on /mnt, ad0s2d on

which is preferred: vm_page_hold() or vm_map_wire()?

2003-01-18 Thread Andrew Gallatin
I'm re-examining some of our driver code where we need to wire down a portion of a user's address space for DMA for os-bypass networking. We currently do vm_map_wire(). This is nice, as it presents a simple interface, but I think its pretty high overhead the way our driver calls it (a page at a

Èíâåñòèöèîííûé ïîðòàë

2003-01-18 Thread ini
Çäðàâñòâóéòå! Íîâûé âèä çàðàáîòêà â ñåòè: http://www.sveta-net1.narod.ru Ïðîøó ïðîùåíèÿ, åñëè îòíÿëà ó âàñ âðåìÿ... Ñâåòëàíà To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: some 5.0 oddities

2003-01-18 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Andy Farkas wrote: Some of observations of 5.0-RELEASE: 1/ Everytime I ssh to the box there are 4 connection attempts to UDP port 53 from itself. ie: Jan 18 12:45:17 kern.info team2 kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 172.22.2.12:53 from 172.22.2.12:49205 Jan 18

Èíâåñòèöèîííûé ïîðòàë

2003-01-18 Thread ini
Çäðàâñòâóéòå! Íîâûé âèä çàðàáîòêà â ñåòè: http://www.sveta-net1.narod.ru Ïðîøó ïðîùåíèÿ, åñëè îòíÿëà ó âàñ âðåìÿ... Ñâåòëàíà To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words in effect of: Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote: Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change gratuitous and it breaks standard compatability rules:

postfix equiv. of sendmail's -bH?

2003-01-18 Thread Kutulu
I upgraded my system last night to the latest -CURRENT and noticed a change in the daily mail cleanup. Unfortunately, I'm not running sendmail, so now I'm getting: Removing stale entries from sendmail host status cache: sendmail: fatal: unsupported: -bH Does anyone know if there's a similar

[PATCH] Asus A7N8X Deluxe, nForce2 and 3com MAC, Broadcom/Altima PHY

2003-01-18 Thread Mikko Hyvarinen
Hi again,O I find it outright odd that the partial patch that didn't help much got committed quickly but the final fix that makes things work didn't. Is there something wrong with the patch or did it just slip through the cracks somewhere? Regards, MSH On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 06:31:01PM

Re: panic: malloc(M_WAITOK) returned NULL

2003-01-18 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Sat, 2003/01/18 at 13:22:45 +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: None of the two could have caused this panic. I would guess that it was caused by the alpha uma_small_alloc() implementation trying less hard to allocate a page than kmem_alloc() (i.e. it does not sleep at all). This problem does also

Re: postfix equiv. of sendmail's -bH?

2003-01-18 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
kutulu I upgraded my system last night to the latest -CURRENT and noticed kutulu a change in the daily mail cleanup. Unfortunately, I'm not running kutulu sendmail, so now I'm getting: kutulu Removing stale entries from sendmail host status cache: kutulu sendmail: fatal: unsupported: -bH kutulu

Re: STABLE-CURRENT rl fails

2003-01-18 Thread Russell L. Carter
Perhaps there's a nice search string that will cough up what to do, if there's hope? This laptop is perfectly stable with STABLE. (But no sound or acpi...) Thanks, Russell : Trial upgrade from a laptop running stable just fine for the last : six months to current (GENERIC) is still

Re: some 5.0 oddities

2003-01-18 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
[ Please don't strip off attributions. ] On 2003-01-18 15:33, Andy Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giorgos Keramidas wrote: Andy Farkas wrote: 5/ disklabel doesn't work: [...] ENOCLUE. As David Schultz pointed out the above part of my reply is too terse. One might think that I am

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Scott Long
Hiten Pandya wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words in effect of: Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote: Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change gratuitous and it breaks standard

postfix equiv. of sendmail's -bH?

2003-01-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 10:25:53 -0500, Kutulu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I upgraded my system last night to the latest -CURRENT and noticed a change in the daily mail cleanup. Unfortunately, I'm not running sendmail, so now I'm getting: If you can come up with a good (silent) way to detect whether

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:20, Scott Long wrote: Hiten Pandya wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words in effect of: Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote: Of course, these things can be

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Will Andrews
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 04:02:00PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: Ok, I agree that the naming could cause confusion since there is a vmmeter struct and a vmtotal struct. However, the Release Engineering policy that was set out at the start of RELENG_5_0 is that public API changes need

Re: x11/kdebase3 build?

2003-01-18 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:46:25PM +0200, Andy Fawcett wrote: #define VM_TOTAL1 /* struct vmtotal */ /* The following define is deprecated in favour of the above one and should not be used in new code */ #define VM_METER

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 05:23:30AM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks a few ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable. I committed a work around --

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Scott Long
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:20, Scott Long wrote: Hiten Pandya wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words in effect of: Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote: Of course, these things

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Mark Murray
[ Very large SNIP ] Scott Long wrote: I'm fully aware of that. As I state in the previous email, I'd like to see 5.0-5.1 happen as smoothly as possible. For background, go re-read my email to developers@ when the RELENG_5_0 branch happened. Fair enough. Also, it's common practice to

Re: panic: malloc(M_WAITOK) returned NULL

2003-01-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 08:53:16PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: I just got the following on axp1: I forgot to add that the machine was under heavy load at the time it panicked (14 simultaneous package builds), so this could well have been due to a low memory condition. Kris

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Scott Long
Mark Murray wrote: [ Very large SNIP ] Scott Long wrote: I'm fully aware of that. As I state in the previous email, I'd like to see 5.0-5.1 happen as smoothly as possible. For background, go re-read my email to developers@ when the RELENG_5_0 branch happened. Fair enough. Also, it's

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:40:45PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: a line like #warning VM_METER is deprecated and will be removed on kluctember 43, 2861 would be nice to, of course. =-) I wanted this, but I don't know who to implement it so that it only prints out IIF VM_METER is used somewhere

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-18 ] [ Subjecte: Re: VM_METER no longer defined? ] On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:40:45PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: a line like #warning VM_METER is deprecated and will be removed on kluctember 43, 2861 would be nice to, of

Re: [PATCH] Asus A7N8X Deluxe, nForce2 and 3com MAC, Broadcom/Altima PHY

2003-01-18 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 06:46:40PM +0200, Mikko Hyvarinen wrote: Hi again,O I find it outright odd that the partial patch that didn't help much got committed quickly but the final fix that makes things work didn't. Is there something wrong with the patch or did it just slip through the

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: postfix equiv. of sendmail's -bH?

2003-01-18 Thread Kutulu
From: Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 3:28 PM On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 10:25:53 -0500, Kutulu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I upgraded my system last night to the latest -CURRENT and noticed a change in the daily mail cleanup. Unfortunately, I'm not running sendmail,

new wi driver problems

2003-01-18 Thread David Thiel
A couple things regarding this new wireless driver - the wepkey option to ifconfig no longer seems to work; I get a SIOCS80211: Invalid argument. Secondly and more importantly, even when the wepkey is set via wicontrol, I can't seem to get any connectivity at all anymore. ifconfig wi0:

RC3 with JDK1.3.1 cause bus error core dump

2003-01-18 Thread William Holt
Hi, I have been trying to use Jetty with RC3 and not having any luck. Today I pinned it down to a problem with trying to convert a SocketListener to a String! The following short program crashes in exactly the same way as Jetty... Any ideas how to fix this? Thank you, -Will

Nuke MIN/MAX duplications

2003-01-18 Thread Hiten Pandya
Hello. Can someone review and commit the attached patches for me, please. There are duplicate MIN/MAX macros all around the kernel, I think we should simply remove the #ifndef _KERNEL from param.h, and let people use those macros instead. I could not LINT test this patch, because of various

badsect testers?

2003-01-18 Thread Juli Mallett
Can someone who actually uses badsect, or who has clue about it, test this diff, to make it use libufs? Thanx, juli. -- Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: BSDFlata -- IRC: juli on EFnet. OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer. ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict. FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on

Re: badsect testers?

2003-01-18 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-18 ] [ Subjecte: badsect testers? ] Can someone who actually uses badsect, or who has clue about it, test this diff, to make it use libufs? Err, THIS diff. %%% Index: Makefile

MSDOS fs install problem

2003-01-18 Thread Giovanni P. Tirloni
Hi, I was trying to install FreeBSD -CURRENT snapshot from 2003-01-16 (current.freebsd.org snapshots) and got this error Error mounting /dev/ad0s1 on /dist: Operation not \ supported by device (19) while trying to mount the slice that had FreeBSD/ on it. It happened with other

Re: postfix equiv. of sendmail's -bH?

2003-01-18 Thread Brad Knowles
At 8:08 PM -0500 2003/01/18, Kutulu wrote: I was just concerned that some useful task that used to occur nightly may now not be occurring, and if so, what I could do to make it occur again. I didn't see anything to even indicate that postfix has a host status cache, meaning the option is

wifi drivers error - 5.0-CURRENT

2003-01-18 Thread Nick H. -- Technical Support Engineer
Got this today after cvsup'ing earlier this morning: if_wi.o: In function `wi_attach': if_wi.o(.text+0x71d): undefined reference to `ieee80211_rate2media' if_wi.o(.text+0x85d): undefined reference to `ieee80211_ifattach' if_wi.o: In function `wi_detach': if_wi.o(.text+0x8f4): undefined reference

Re: wifi drivers error - 5.0-CURRENT

2003-01-18 Thread Will Andrews
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 10:14:47PM -0600, Nick H. -- Technical Support Engineer wrote: Got this today after cvsup'ing earlier this morning: Read src/UPDATING. Regards, -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: MSDOS fs install problem

2003-01-18 Thread Anti
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 01:25:12 -0200 Giovanni P. Tirloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was trying to install FreeBSD -CURRENT snapshot from 2003-01-16 (current.freebsd.org snapshots) and got this error Error mounting /dev/ad0s1 on /dist: Operation not \ supported by device (19)

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Mark Murray wrote: [ Very large SNIP ] Scott Long wrote: I'm fully aware of that. As I state in the previous email, I'd like to see 5.0-5.1 happen as smoothly as possible. For background, go re-read my email to developers@ when the RELENG_5_0 branch happened.

5.0-RC3 working great, but NOTES incomplete?

2003-01-18 Thread Craig R
I got 5.0-RC3 working great on my box today, but when I went to make a custom kernel and read NOTES I noticed that it makes no mention of IPFIREWALL and friends. Is this intentional? craig@boss:~$ grep IPFIREWALL /sys/i386/conf/NOTES craig@boss:~$ Nothing shows up. What's the scoop? -Craig

Re: 5.0-RC3 working great, but NOTES incomplete?

2003-01-18 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Craig R [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-18 ] [ Subjecte: 5.0-RC3 working great, but NOTES incomplete? ] I got 5.0-RC3 working great on my box today, but when I went to make a custom kernel and read NOTES I noticed that it makes no mention of IPFIREWALL and friends. Is this

Re: 5.0-RC3 working great, but NOTES incomplete?

2003-01-18 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-01-18 21:32, Craig R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got 5.0-RC3 working great on my box today, but when I went to make a custom kernel and read NOTES I noticed that it makes no mention of IPFIREWALL and friends. Is this intentional? Yes, it is intentional. craig@boss:~$ grep IPFIREWALL

aicasm broke?

2003-01-18 Thread Jeff Utter
I'm using 5.0 -current (as of about 5 minutes ago) but it's been doing this for DAYS.. kernel build dies on this: /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/aicasm_symbol.c:50:16: db.h: No such file or directory which is then followed by a ton of other errors, obviously caused by the lack of db.h. anyone

Re: 5.0-RC3 working great, but NOTES incomplete?

2003-01-18 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 09:32:09PM -0800, Craig R wrote: I got 5.0-RC3 working great on my box today, but when I went to make a custom kernel and read NOTES I noticed that it makes no mention of IPFIREWALL and friends. Is this intentional? craig@boss:~$ grep IPFIREWALL /sys/i386/conf/NOTES

Re: aicasm broke?

2003-01-18 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Jeff Utter wrote: I'm using 5.0 -current (as of about 5 minutes ago) but it's been doing this for DAYS.. kernel build dies on this: /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/aicasm_symbol.c:50:16: db.h: No such file or directory which is then followed by a ton of other errors,

Re: aicasm broke?

2003-01-18 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 12:57:17AM -0500, Jeff Utter wrote: I'm using 5.0 -current (as of about 5 minutes ago) but it's been doing this for DAYS.. kernel build dies on this: /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/aicasm_symbol.c:50:16: db.h: No such file or directory which is then followed by a

Re: 5.0-RC3 working great, but NOTES incomplete?

2003-01-18 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 09:34:24PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Craig R [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-18 ] [ Subjecte: 5.0-RC3 working great, but NOTES incomplete? ] I got 5.0-RC3 working great on my box today, but when I went to make a custom kernel and read NOTES I noticed

Kernel panic in USB: don't do that

2003-01-18 Thread Russell Vincent
Hi, FreeBSD bree.elfwind.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Jan 18 09:05:06 GMT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RV i386 Just received a kernel panic (don't do that) whilst attemping to upload the firmware for an Alcatel USB ADSL modem. #10 0xc024fa3b in panic

Re: new wi driver problems

2003-01-18 Thread Sam Leffler
A couple things regarding this new wireless driver - the wepkey option to ifconfig no longer seems to work; I get a SIOCS80211: Invalid argument. Secondly and more importantly, even when the wepkey is set via wicontrol, I can't seem to get any connectivity at all anymore. I fixed the