>Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:47:18 -0800
>From: "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:14:26PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> > I've been seeing this for a couple of weeks since I updated my laptop to
>> > CURRENT. I do a normal shutdown (-p or -r) and reboot. The shutdown
I pooched the patch. It's updated now.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> I'm looking for some poeple to try out my threading patches. I'm only
> looking for people to make sure that there have been no reversions in
> signal handling. I'm not ready for people to test out the actual
>
In the last episode (Mar 25), Terry Lambert said:
> Ian Dowse wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you mean by a "lost" mount. Do all further
> > accesses to the filesystem hang?
> >
> > It is normal enough to get the above 'not responding' errors
> > occasionally on a busy fileserver, but only if they ar
Your patch is working great here. Still struggling with pppd
configuration, but I am no longer getting any system freezes on my ppp
dialin attempts. Thanks, Maxim!
-Tod
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 09:18 AM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Try a next patch.
Index: if_ppp.c
I'm looking for some poeple to try out my threading patches. I'm only
looking for people to make sure that there have been no reversions in
signal handling. I'm not ready for people to test out the actual
threading interfaces.
You should notice no changes in application behavior or system perfor
Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Patric Mrawek writes:
> >On several clients (-DP1, -DP2, 4-stable) mounting a nfs-share
> >(mount_nfs -i -U -3 server:/nfs /mnt) and then copying data from that
> >share to the local disk (find -x -d /mnt | cpio -pdumv /local) results
> >in lost NF
Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> I've been seeing this for a couple of weeks since I updated my laptop to
> CURRENT. I do a normal shutdown (-p or -r) and reboot. The shutdown
> looked normal, with no problems reported with the sync, but, when the
> system is rebooted, the partitions are all shown as poss
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-25 18.41 -0500]:
Hi John,
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/linux.patch Similar to Drew's
> except that I patched alpha as well. Similarly untested. Apply
> with patch -p6 while in /sys. Please let me know if it fixes the
> problem.
It fixes th
Martin Karlsson writes:
> * John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-25 18.41 -0500]:
>
> [...snip...]
>
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/linux.patch Similar to Drew's
> > except that I patched alpha as well. Similarly untested. Apply
> > with patch -p6 while in /sys. Please l
I'm not sure if it's related, but i've noticed under HEAVY nfs load my
nfs server hangs for a while, then it REBOOTS! i'm pretty sure it's a
nfs related problem, because doing heavy disk i/o on the server itself
doen't have any related problems at all.. only when it's heavy access
over nfs.
The Anarcat wrote:
> > When you killed the power on your system and reset it, you
> > lost the cached data sitting in the ATA disk. This is due
> > to the fact that the ATA disk lied, and claimed that it had
> > committed some writes to stable storage, when in fact it had
> > only copied them to t
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:06:52 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 March 2003 at 18:44:03 +0100, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > when calling 'vinum start' it responds with
> >
> > usage: read drive [drive ...]
> >
> > from looking at the code, it appears that it cannot f
Alexander Langer wrote:
> Actually I don't care _where_ the panic happened. If I hadn't manually
> interupted the boot process, this kernel would have booted and paniced
> on that error for the next three years. I could fix that by simply
> doing a manual (background_fsck=NO), so something is "br
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-25 18.41 -0500]:
[...snip...]
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/linux.patch Similar to Drew's
> except that I patched alpha as well. Similarly untested. Apply
> with patch -p6 while in /sys. Please let me know if it fixes the
> problem.
Sure, I
* Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-25 18.10 -0500]:
[...snip text...]
> Index: compat/linux/linux_mib.c
> ===
[...snip patch]
Hi! Sure, I'll try it. But, from where (i.e. which directory) should I apply
it, and with whi
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:13:05AM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> > #12 0xc01b86b5 in panic (fmt=0xe35e9bbc "Y\2179) at
> > ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:509
> > #13 0xc01aeae3 in _mtx_lock_flags (m=0x0, opts=0,
> > file=0xc03375e7 "../../../kern/kern_resource.c", line=989) at
> > ../../../kern
On Tuesday, 25 March 2003 at 18:44:03 +0100, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> when calling 'vinum start' it responds with
>
> usage: read drive [drive ...]
>
> from looking at the code, it appears that it cannot find the disk drives
> to read the configuration from.
>
> vinum read da0 da1
>
> just
Hi!
With Terry's suggestion I turned ATA WC off this morning, and now, this
happened: A crash when I pressed play in XMMS (this seems to be the
first page fault you see, and then, with fsck in the background:
yet another panic (UFS2 related?):
The crashdump is a bit odd, since I don't know why i
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Patric Mrawek writes:
>On several clients (-DP1, -DP2, 4-stable) mounting a nfs-share
>(mount_nfs -i -U -3 server:/nfs /mnt) and then copying data from that
>share to the local disk (find -x -d /mnt | cpio -pdumv /local) results
>in lost NFS-mount.
>
>client kernel:
On 25-Mar-2003 John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 25-Mar-2003 Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>>
>> Martin Karlsson writes:
>>
>> > #9 0xc02dca88 in calltrap () at {standard input}:96
>> > #10 0xc01e7b0b in panic (fmt=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:528
>> > #11 0xc020256e in witness_lock (lock=0x
John Baldwin writes:
>
> Oh, good catch Drew. My bad it seems :( I'll work up a patch.
>
I see this all the time when people add code to our driver, test it
only on linux. So I'm quite used to the symptoms ;)
Thanks,
Drew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
On 25-Mar-2003 Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Martin Karlsson writes:
>
> > #9 0xc02dca88 in calltrap () at {standard input}:96
> > #10 0xc01e7b0b in panic (fmt=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:528
> > #11 0xc020256e in witness_lock (lock=0xc03760c0, flags=8, file=0xc0332416
> "/usr/src
Martin Karlsson writes:
> #9 0xc02dca88 in calltrap () at {standard input}:96
> #10 0xc01e7b0b in panic (fmt=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:528
> #11 0xc020256e in witness_lock (lock=0xc03760c0, flags=8, file=0xc0332416
> "/usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c", line=206)
> at /usr/src
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:22:04PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I just got this on bento (running a kernel from Mar 17). It was under
> heavy disk load at the time, which may or may not be relevant.
[...]
> #12 0xc01b86b5 in panic (fmt=0xe35e9bbc "Y\2179) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:509
>
I just got this on bento (running a kernel from Mar 17). It was under
heavy disk load at the time, which may or may not be relevant.
Kris
panic: mtx_lock() of spin mutex %s @ %s:%d
panic messages:
---
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; lapic.id =
fault virtual add
--On Tuesday, March 25, 2003 13:51:34 -0800 Maksim Yevmenkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry,
[...]
Mar 25 21:59:36 angel5 kernel: uhub2: device problem, disabling port 1
I had a similar (USB) issue on my Fujitsu Laptop, until I **ENABLED**
the USB Floppy
option in my BIOS. Don't ask me why
I've been seeing this for a couple of weeks since I updated my laptop to
CURRENT. I do a normal shutdown (-p or -r) and reboot. The shutdown
looked normal, with no problems reported with the sync, but, when the
system is rebooted, the partitions are all shown as possibly
unclean. From my dmesg:
Mou
Larry,
[...]
Mar 25 21:59:36 angel5 kernel: uhub2: device problem, disabling port 1
I had a similar (USB) issue on my Fujitsu Laptop, until I **ENABLED**
the USB Floppy
option in my BIOS. Don't ask me why that fixed it, but ANY USB device I
plugged in would
garner the above response without th
Hi,
are there any known issues with NFS-mounts using UDP? I'm seeing some
weird behaviour with a NFS-server (-current as of today).
On several clients (-DP1, -DP2, 4-stable) mounting a nfs-share
(mount_nfs -i -U -3 server:/nfs /mnt) and then copying data from that
share to the local disk (find -x
Hello!
I'm running 5.0-RELEASE and this might have already been reported
and/or fixed, but here it goes anyways.
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights re
Hi,
My system: Current, cvsup'd Mon Mar 25 17:21:05 CET 2003
I load linux-compatability through /etc/rc.conf (linux_enable="YES").
If I unload it (kldunload linux.ko) and then run another command (so far, I've tested
kldstat(8) and ls(1)),
I get a panic:
panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mute
--On Tuesday, March 25, 2003 13:25:47 -0800 Maksim Yevmenkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tobias,
yes it is a CSR chip based device. can you tell if its a USB device?
yes, it is usb. windows clearly states it as usb.
good. then you will most likely get it to work. if you
get it to attach (see be
Tobias,
yes it is a CSR chip based device. can you tell if its a USB device?
yes, it is usb. windows clearly states it as usb.
good. then you will most likely get it to work. if you
get it to attach (see below).
1) at loader prompt type (without quotes) "boot -v"
2) do not press the Bluetooth butt
On Tue Mar 25, 2003 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems The Anarcat wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for those precisions... This could be a FAQ, pertaining also to
> > how to enable it.
> >
> > So it's enabled system-wide? Can't it be done at the bus or device
> > level?
>
> You can set
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
-
Hi,
when calling 'vinum start' it responds with
usage: read drive [drive ...]
from looking at the code, it appears that it cannot find the disk drives
to read the configuration from.
vinum read da0 da1
just works.
So what's the problem? (kernel and user land from today)
harti
--
harti bran
It seems The Anarcat wrote:
> On Tue Mar 25, 2003 at 08:16:28AM +0100, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> > It seems The Anarcat wrote:
> > > Can't the ata drivers detect that condition or recognize the set of
> > > drives that are broken instead of penalizing everyone else?
> >
> > ATAPI DMA is more likely
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Fred Clift wrote:
[SNIP]
FC>/usr/src/lib/libatm/ioctl_subr.c: In function `get_cfg_info':
FC>/usr/src/lib/libatm/ioctl_subr.c:395: warning: cast increases required
FC>alignment of target type
FC>/usr/src/lib/libatm/ioctl_subr.c: In function `get_intf_info':
FC>/usr/src/lib/li
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> /bang/src/lib/libatm/ip_checksum.c: In function `ip_checksum':
> /bang/src/lib/libatm/ip_checksum.c:80: warning: cast increases required alignmen
I see in cvs that many of the files in this library have been updated in
the last 11 or 12 hours... I
On Tue Mar 25, 2003 at 03:54:58AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Alexander Langer wrote:
> > Thus spake Terry Lambert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Disable write caching on your ATA drive. You should be able to
> > > "safely" reset after that.
> >
> > Good idea, thanks. Nevertheless: I don't think
On Tue Mar 25, 2003 at 08:16:28AM +0100, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems The Anarcat wrote:
> > > hw.ata.atapi_dma="1"# Run the CD-ROM/DVD in DMA mode
> > > to /boot/loader.conf.
> > >
> > > This should be in almost EVERY /boot/loader.conf. The default is 0 (PIO)
> > > because DMA is broken o
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:04:07 +0100
Alexander Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We claim background fsck as a "cool new" feature in the release notes,
> which is even the DEFAULT, including WC on ATA disks, which is ALSO the
> default. So , and if this is broken, there is a serious design flaw,
On 2003-03-25 07:10, Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:11:00AM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote:
>>On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:43:17PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>> On 2003-03-24 19:14, Christian Brueffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > I'll write a small manpa
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steve Kargl wrote:
SK>On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:11:00AM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote:
SK>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:43:17PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
SK>> > On 2003-03-24 19:14, Christian Brueffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SK>> > > I'll write a small manpage this
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:11:00AM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:43:17PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > On 2003-03-24 19:14, Christian Brueffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'll write a small manpage this evening which says that MAKEDEV is
> > > gone now wit
Thus spake Terry Lambert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> A manual fsck can deal with corrupt data.
[...]
Yes, I recall the discussion about WC on ata vs. softupdates a few
months back. I even have it disabled on more important machines than
this one :-)
> The panic was not, in fact, a result of the bac
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:58:35AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > I had a working Linux world on my laptop. I upgraded my kernel and
> > acroread4 stopped working. Now all I get is:
> >
> > Exited with error code: 0x400e0009.
The Anarcat wrote:
On Mon Mar 24, 2003 at 02:14:48PM -0500, Don wrote:
Should a PR be filed or some QA team contacted to make sure this
problem doesn't stay alive in 5.2? :)
This isn't, by chance, a problem with your setting for the
sysctl "hw.ata.atapi_dma" is it?
How extraordinarly cute! This
Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake Terry Lambert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Disable write caching on your ATA drive. You should be able to
> > "safely" reset after that.
>
> Good idea, thanks. Nevertheless: I don't think the system should
> panic on background fsck's, while a manual fsck works.
Thus spake Terry Lambert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Disable write caching on your ATA drive. You should be able to
> "safely" reset after that.
Good idea, thanks. Nevertheless: I don't think the system should
panic on background fsck's, while a manual fsck works.
Alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
cc -pg -O -pipe -mcpu=ev4 -mtune=ev5 -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-p
rototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite
-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wuninitialized -c /bang/src/lib/libatm
/ip_checksum.c -o ip_checksum.po
cc1: warnings being tr
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
-
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 11:18:59PM +0100, "Julian St."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mo, 2003-03-24 um 20.33 schrieb Vallo Kallaste:
> >
> > Current isn't better. This is a long time problem and is most
> > noticeable when you "downgrade" from -current to -stable... it's
> > unforgettable feeli
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:43:17PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2003-03-24 19:14, Christian Brueffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll write a small manpage this evening which says that MAKEDEV is
> > gone now with a short summary of what devfs does. Does that resolve
> > your worries?
>
55 matches
Mail list logo
