nfe0 connection not as reliable; a few questions...

2016-04-23 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
Updated current { from Sept last year } to this week... and nfe0 now seems to require a reboot daily at least { no access to beyond-the-lan ... } Is there maybe some tunable (net.inet... ) related or sysctl { kern.ipc... } similar, that could be a cause? New code of ifconfig or the network

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-23 Thread dan_partelly
This was all it was asked. Thanks. > Im saying that feedback has been heard and understood and providing more > now while things are in flux to try to address those issues is not likely > to be fruitful. > Warner > > Links: > -- > [1] mailto:dan_parte...@rdsor.ro

Re: NanoBSD (Was Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8))

2016-04-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > [CC trimmed] > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Warner Losh wrote: > >> >> I personally will be refraining from engaging further. I plan on seeing >> what gaps there are by adding support to NanoBSD for packages. I'll be >>

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Dan Partelly wrote: > You says that everything will be OK. I want to believe you. But giving > the track record VIMAGE has, and how many gugs go on and on with years Im > not so sure that you guys wont do the same with this subsystem,

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-23 Thread Roger Marquis
To clarify this proposal a bit better, there are only two flags I think should be added to pkg to accommodate the usability issues introduced by base packages and to do so without breaking existing scripts and aliases: -b) only display base packages -B) display both base and third party

Re: why 100 packages are evil

2016-04-23 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 23/04/2016 17:19, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message , Lyndon > Neren > berg writes: > >> With freebsd-update, an announcement comes out that says 'update'!. So we >> do. Move from 10.2-p11 to 10.2-p12. There is a very

Re: why 100 packages are evil

2016-04-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , Lyndon Neren berg writes: >With freebsd-update, an announcement comes out that says 'update'!. So we >do. Move from 10.2-p11 to 10.2-p12. There is a very clear track record >of why and how this happened. Is

Jenkins build is back to stable : FreeBSD_HEAD #185

2016-04-23 Thread jenkins-admin
See ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Failed to boot -Current snapshot memstick img with EFI

2016-04-23 Thread Howard Su
The issue is partition table in img is wrong so that GEOM cannot discover the partitions. Detailed error: GEOM_PART: last LBA is below first LBA: 0 < 32 GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (da0, MBR) I tried this month and last month memstick img. both has same problem. Any idea on the issue?

NanoBSD (Was Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8))

2016-04-23 Thread Daniel Eischen
[CC trimmed] On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Warner Losh wrote: I personally will be refraining from engaging further. I plan on seeing what gaps there are by adding support to NanoBSD for packages. I'll be busy with that. In talking to Glen and others, we've already identified a few easy gaps to fill.

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-23 Thread Baho Utot
Sorry for hijacking this thread but where can one find the code for 11-CURRENT that handles the packaging of base? I would like to have a look at it so I can form my opinion on packaging base. I moved to FreeBSD from LinuxFromScratch, ( I packaged that with the RPM package manager and it

Build failed in Jenkins: FreeBSD_HEAD #184

2016-04-23 Thread jenkins-admin
See -- Started by an SCM change Started by an SCM change > git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=10 Fetching changes from the remote Git repository > git config remote.origin.url

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-23 Thread Dan Partelly
>> > > *THAT* is the tone I was complaining about. This is not at all respectful. > Respect is a two way street. If you want respect, offer yours. We make our point very poorly, I get you, but it is the result of what you and others from the projectdo. Meaning, 0 communication. I dont

Re: Heads up

2016-04-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:42:33 -0600 > Warner Losh wrote: > > > The CAM I/O scheduler has been committed to current. This work is > > described in > > https://people.freebsd.org/~imp/bsdcan2015/iosched-v3.pdf