ATAng lockups (Re: geom-ata forever cycle)

2003-11-23 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 13:08:10, netch (Valentin Nechayev) wrote about geom-ata forever cycle: VN 5.1-current of 2003-11-20 hangs during kernel initialization with forever VN cycle around geom partitioning detection and ATA read failure. VN Message rate is too fast to record, no stopping

geom-ata forever cycle

2003-11-22 Thread Valentin Nechayev
5.1-current of 2003-11-20 hangs during kernel initialization with forever cycle around geom partitioning detection and ATA read failure. Message rate is too fast to record, no stopping is available, no serial console. Previous 5-current on this machine was of 2003-05-23. How to diagnose? dmesg of

Re: geom-ata forever cycle

2003-11-22 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 05:45:09, nickh wrote about Re: geom-ata forever cycle: Personally I dont think this is GEOM related. I had a drive start doing Yes, it is ATAng related, AFAIS, but triggers GEOM forever cycle. this to me (happens often as I work in a large datacenter) and the drive is

Re: Dualbooting STABLE CURRENT

2003-11-02 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 20:38:36, s.wingate (Steve Wingate) wrote about Re: Dualbooting STABLE CURRENT: I don't like the sound of that. I'll just stick with STABLE until 5.x is really ready. -STABLE will have the same problem since its in boot0 and the BIOS, not the OS on the partition its

Re: UFS file system problem in either stable or current

2003-11-02 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about UFS file system problem in either stable or current: DS There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs DS support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on DS both releases, each claims that

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-11-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 17:32:29, dwhite (Doug White) wrote about Re: problems with sysinstall: Well, I understand it for slices. But why I can't create new partition in exist slice and newfs it? It was OK in -stable. DW yes, this is a change to -current. It is for your own safety. Don't

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-11-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 05:44:44, sem (Sergey Matveychuk) wrote about problems with sysinstall: SM The first one: when I install -current on disk where WinXP on first SM slice, sysinstall brakes WinXP boot complete. I got 'Missing operation SM system' everytime. Even I've tried 'fixboot' and

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-11-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 18:58:52, q (Ulrich Spoerlein) wrote about Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved: US First of all, the Partition Editor has the 'A' option to use all of the US available HDD space. It creates a DOS-compatible slice (starting at US sector 63 and ending on cylinder

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-11-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 16:43:12, q (Ulrich Spoerlein) wrote about Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved: It is NOT useless. Why do you think it is? Perhaps you don't relize that some BIOS's wont boot from a hard disk that isn't partitioned to agree with the specifications of

Re: Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-07 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:01:02, DougB wrote about Re: Way forward with BIND 8: FYI, for those wondering why I'm not considering BIND 9 for import, please see http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/whybind8.html Among other things: standard resolver is waaay(tm) old. Even keeping with BIND8, it

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2 boot up messages

2003-06-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, May 30, 2003 at 18:53:16, segr (Stephane Raimbault) wrote about FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2 boot up messages: SR I just noticed that when I boot up in FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2 I get a whole bunch of SR messages fly by the screen (see below for errors from /var/log/messages). SR Does anyone know what is

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-06-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, May 30, 2003 at 17:38:04, larse (Lars Eggert) wrote about Re: Libthr stable enough for testing: LE I tried, but the following is a surefire way to freeze my SMP box solid LE at the moment (with today's libthr): SCHED_ULE or SCHED_4BSD? -netch-

Re: no psm interrupt; lock order reversal

2003-01-21 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 23:07:36, netch (Valentin Nechayev) wrote about no psm interrupt; lock order reversal: VN 5.0-RC of 2002.12.05.12.00.00-UTC VN Bigger problem that it can't obtain interrupts from PS/2 mouse, VN hence mouse fails to work. systat shows no int 12 issued at all. ACPI

[OT] sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-02 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 21:39:33, tlambert2 (Terry Lambert) wrote about Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay: TL It's an editorial complaint. I don't like the breaking the TL program into seperate programs by function. IMO, DJB is wrong, TL and this does nothing to enhance security.

Re: cvsup weird problem

2002-12-06 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 13:11:51, osa (Sergey A. Osokin) wrote about Re: cvsup weird problem: SAO Any other idea? :-) Remove src/contrib/gcc/INSTALL/ and sup checkouts directory simultaneously, this usually fixes such errors ;) Delete src/contrib/gcc/INSTALL Cannot delete

no psm interrupt; lock order reversal

2002-12-06 Thread Valentin Nechayev
5.0-RC of 2002.12.05.12.00.00-UTC Lock order reversal without panic: lock order reversal 1st 0xc2e30708 vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @ /var/HEAD/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:939 2nd 0xc033c3c0 vm page queue mutex (vm page queue mutex) @ /var/HEAD/src/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:424 Bigger problem that

Re: fd0c mount(8) Race

2001-07-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 00:16:53, cristjc (Crist J. Clark) wrote about fd0c mount(8) Race: mount: /dev/fd0c: No such file or directory That is, even though once I drop into single-user mode we see the symlink for /dev/fd0c, it does not seem like it was there when 'mount -a -t nonfs' is

Re: From -current to -stable?

2001-06-25 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 15:02:37, TJ (T.J. Kniveton) wrote about From -current to -stable?: I followed the directions on the freebsd web site to grab the latest -stable sources, but it looks like somehow I got the -current sources, built and installed them (doh!). Everything is working ok,

ptys devfs

2001-06-24 Thread Valentin Nechayev
I. A session under screen, or sshd, or any another: netch@iv:~tty /dev/ttyp2 netch@iv:~ls -l /dev/tty /dev/ttyp2 crw--w 1 netch tty5, 2 Jun 24 13:09 /dev/tty crw--w 1 netch tty5, 2 Jun 24 13:09 /dev/ttyp2 root@iv:~##ls -l /dev/ttyp* crw--w 1 netch tty5, 2

Re: su broken?

2001-06-24 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 19:21:20, rb (Bob Bishop) wrote about su broken?: su appears to be asking for a password when invoked by root, eg: # su bin -c pwd Password: root@iv:~##su bin -c pwd This account is currently not available. root@iv:~##su -m bin -c pwd /root Broken, surely?

Re: Problems with md5 -p

2001-06-24 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 09:25:22, stephen (Stephen Montgomery-Smith) wrote about Problems with md5 -p: I reproduce it stably on my -current. The second checksum is constant and it is MD5 checksum of an empty stream: root@iv:/usr/HEAD/src/sbin/md5##md5 /dev/null d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e

Re: Problems with md5 -p

2001-06-24 Thread Valentin Nechayev
ChangesPath 1.20.2.2 +46 -52src/sbin/md5/md5.c Before them the case when MDFilter(0) should be called, checked separately (argc==1). After them it is not checked, fix argument processing is somehow wrong. IMO these commits should be reverted. Valentin Nechayev wrote: Sun, Jun 24

Re: ps 'D' state - ?

2001-06-16 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 23:21:33, Tor.Egge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote about Re: ps 'D' state - ?: Are `select' and `nanosleep' disk uninterruptable waits? ;| No. The ps command gave wrong output. flag = k-ki_p-ki_flag; - sflag = k-ki_p-ki_flag; + sflag = k-ki_p-ki_sflag;

panic: free: multiple frees

2001-06-04 Thread Valentin Nechayev
-current, cvsup: date=2001.06.03.00.00.00 Normally worked, but after Ctrl-Alt-Del: IdlePTD 4038656 initial pcb at 32f940 panicstr: from debugger panic messages: --- panic: free: multiple frees panic: from debugger Uptime: 25m49s (kgdb) bt #0 0xc0199a36 in dumpsys () #1 0xc0199823 in boot ()

Re: Boot time memory issue

2001-05-27 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sat, May 26, 2001 at 22:03:34, barry (Barry Lustig) wrote about Re: Boot time memory issue: SMAP type=01 base= 0010 len= 13ef [...] Did that and got the same error. I put a printf just before the pa_indx++ in machdep.c and watched it increment by 2's all the way

Re: Date for a working -current?

2001-05-25 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Wed, May 23, 2001 at 21:26:37, jkoshy (Joseph Koshy) wrote about Date for a working -current?: I'm in the processing of bring a 5-current system of Oct 2000 vintage more upto-date. The kernel built around May 23rd 2001, has been quite unstable, with numerous warning on lock order

Re: downgrade

2001-05-25 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Wed, May 23, 2001 at 15:43:50, nk (Norbert Koch) wrote about downgrade: Is it possible to downgrade a machine from -current to -stable? A ~month ago I downgraded my home system from -current to -stable (RELENG_4) via buildworld+installworld. But to do it successfully I had to replace

Re: Boot time memory issue

2001-05-24 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, May 20, 2001 at 19:53:29, barry (Barry Lustig) wrote about Boot time memory issue: Do verbose boot (`boot -v') with large SC_HISTORY_SIZE (1000 at least, 2000 at most), and after boot check for SMAP ... lines at the very beginning of the kernel boot log at /dev/console. (They are not

Re: random woes (no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto)

2001-03-27 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:02:08, mark (Mark Murray) wrote about "Re: random woes ("no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto")": ssh: no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto. See ssl(8) [...] It seems the compatibility with the previous minor of urandom has been silently removed (I assume

Re: /etc/exports: 192.168.5 = 192.168.0.5

2001-03-25 Thread Valentin Nechayev
/var -alldirs -maproot=root: -network 192.168.5 -mask 255.255.255.0 showmount -e showed 192.168.5 was being interpreted as 192.168.0.5 This is the correct interpretation. Changing -network to 192.168.5.0 fixed it, naturally, but the 192.168.5 used to work. It was broken, then. :-)

Re: Interesting backtrace...

2001-03-18 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 16:41:03, des (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) wrote about "Interesting backtrace...": I finally caught a backtrace from one of those recurring stack smash panics. I've been getting a few of these every day for a couple of weeks now but never caught a dump; I caught this one by

kernel logging under heavy load

2001-03-03 Thread Valentin Nechayev
A simple but intensive fork bomb were started on 5.0-current UP machine. After it, /var/log/messages contains: Mar 3 19:16:46 iv /boot/kernel/kernel: roc: table is full Mar 3 19:16:46 iv /boot/kernel/kernel: proc: table is full Mar 3 19:16:46 iv last message repeated 42 times Mar 3 19:16:46

random fallback init

2000-10-16 Thread Valentin Nechayev
The problem that when random device was not seeded, boot simply hangs (on ldconfig! why?) Ugly init(8) gives no chance to stop booting and fall to reboot or single mode again via ctrl-alt-del or another key combination; sleeping on "rndblk" channel in ldconfig is not interruptible; only DDB or

Re: (1) hanging up on ldconfig; (2) entropy file read failed

2000-10-15 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 20:52:59, netch wrote about "(1) hanging up on ldconfig; (2) entropy file read failed": This is also entropy file and random device problem. ldconfig which hangs: pid=107, flag=004006, stat=3, wchan=c0336f80, wmesg=rndblk - waits for random data (?) This handing appeared

microuptime() went backwards: possible diagnosis

2000-10-06 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Following is partial dmesg output from 5.0(13)-CURRENT-20001002 kernel with advanced debugging prints: ==={{{ mi_startup(): call subsystem 0x880(142606336), microuptime is 1.4027506 mi_startup(): call subsystem 0x880(142606336), microuptime is 1.4027897 mi_startup(): call subsystem

Re: microuptime() went backwards

2000-10-06 Thread Valentin Nechayev
At Fri, 6 Oct 2000 22:00:23 + (UTC), jhb wrote: JB The problem was that the interrupt threads for the clk interrupt introduced JB enough latency that occasionally (mostly during a heavy load of interrupts) JB tc_windup() wasn't called soon enough to update the timecounter. Making On my

load average is 1 when no processes active; etc.

2000-09-10 Thread Valentin Nechayev
System in question is: root@nn:~##uname -mrs FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 root@nn:~##grep FreeBSD_version /usr/include/sys/param.h #undef __FreeBSD_version #define __FreeBSD_version 500012/* Master, propagated to newvers */ root@nn:~## cvsup was Sep 8, approximately at 18:00 GMT. `top -I'

Re: microuptime() went backwards

2000-09-10 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Hello John Baldwin! microuptime() went backwards (1.7682417 - 1.997434) I recall reading in -current earlier this week that someone was looking for victims getting this. What further information can I provide? JB This is a SMPng issue on UP machines. I have obtained the same on non-SMP

Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/uucpd uucpd.c

1999-11-08 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Hello Eivind Eklund! Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 14:25:22, eivind wrote about "Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/uucpd uucpd.c" in cvs-commiters@, cvs-all@: Just for the record, this is considered a really bad thing, because one common error is typing the password when the username is being

Re: Filesystem deadlock

1999-02-23 Thread Valentin Nechayev
ANK for j in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do ANK echo -n $i $j ~~ ;( ANK nohup sh -c 'while :; do find /usr -type f | xargs fgrep zukabuka; ANK done' \ /dev/null 21 ANK echo ANK done -- -- Valentin Nechayev ne...@lucky.net II:LDXIII/MCMLXXII.CCC To Unsubscribe