on apic_isr looping which leads nowhere.
So I thought maybe things improve if I debug from another machine.
What do you use for kernel debugging? According to the handbook kgdb over
serial
is a good option, do you agree? I'm on a netbook with no ethernet and no
option
for firewire: can I have
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:31:25 +0200
José Pérez Arauzo f...@aoek.com wrote:
I hope Dcons + 1394 works where it's applicable.
BR,
--
José Pérez Arauzo
As a constant user of DCons+firewire, I can say it certainly works, and
quite well at that. At least on PowerPC where firewire is
which leads nowhere.
So I thought maybe things improve if I debug from another machine.
What do you use for kernel debugging? According to the handbook kgdb over
serial
is a good option, do you agree? I'm on a netbook with no ethernet and no
option
for firewire: can I have a USB
On Sep 28, 2014, at 17:35, Justin Hibbits chmeeed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:31:25 +0200
José Pérez Arauzo f...@aoek.com wrote:
I hope Dcons + 1394 works where it's applicable.
BR,
--
José Pérez Arauzo
As a constant user of DCons+firewire, I can say it certainly
not complete hw probes on my Acer V5.
I get stuck on apic_isr looping which leads nowhere.
So I thought maybe things improve if I debug from another machine.
What do you use for kernel debugging? According to the handbook kgdb over
serial
is a good option, do you agree? I'm on a netbook
does
not complete hw probes on my Acer V5.
I get stuck on apic_isr looping which leads nowhere.
So I thought maybe things improve if I debug from another machine.
What do you use for kernel debugging? According to the handbook kgdb over
serial
is a good option, do you agree? I'm
to
select 0 or 1. Whatever I select, I get a flashing cursor then nothing.
If I leave it at nothing eventually the bios asks what the problem is.
What am I doing wrong? The board is an Asus Z87-PRO and the disks are
Hitatchi 3TB drives. I'm trying to install to ad1, ad0 is a SSD. I've
tried ad0 ad2
system, it gives me the option to
select 0 or 1. Whatever I select, I get a flashing cursor then nothing.
If I leave it at nothing eventually the bios asks what the problem is.
What am I doing wrong? The board is an Asus Z87-PRO and the disks are
Hitatchi 3TB drives. I'm trying to install to ad1
the option to
select 0 or 1. Whatever I select, I get a flashing cursor then nothing.
If I leave it at nothing eventually the bios asks what the problem is.
What am I doing wrong? The board is an Asus Z87-PRO and the disks are
Hitatchi 3TB drives. I'm trying to install to ad1, ad0 is a SSD. I've
tried
) reporting what blew up, unlike the
issue in rescue/, the 'NAME is mandatory' error has been about 90%
reproducible between both amd64 and i386. (Without being able to build
at least amd64, I cannot test other architectures. Useless data point,
I know.)
Yea, that turns out to be a cascade
Is a failure to build head/ with high make(1) -j values. Again.
With empty /usr/obj, I have been seeing strange build failures on head/
with high -jN values, but even as low as -j10. The machine used to
build snapshots of head/ and stable/ branches has been using -j48 for
several months without
On Jun 14, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
Is a failure to build head/ with high make(1) -j values. Again.
There’s likely a dozen or more of these lurking in the tree. Ian’s last set
of patches squashed many of the ones in lib, but I’ve not done a careful
audit of the
approximately zilch…
Yeah. To be honest, it's the similar situation I emailed you privately
about a few weeks ago with the race in rescue/ that makes no sense. So
while I don't entirely trust make(1) reporting what blew up, unlike the
issue in rescue/, the 'NAME is mandatory' error has been about 90
the system. Upon reboot this is what I get?
=40 7814037088 da11 GPT (3.6T)
40 7814037088 1 freebsd-ufs (3.6T)
=40 7814037088 diskid/DISK-Z1Z0DQ73%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%
20%20%20%20 GPT (3.6T)
40 7814037088
1 freebsd-ufs (3.6T)
What is going
)
root@:~ #
Then run a newfs and reboot the system. Upon reboot this is what I get?
=40 7814037088 da11 GPT (3.6T)
40 7814037088 1 freebsd-ufs (3.6T)
=40 7814037088 diskid/DISK-Z1Z0DQ73%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%
20%20%20%20 GPT (3.6T
)
root@:~ #
Then run a newfs and reboot the system. Upon reboot this is what I get?
=40 7814037088 da11 GPT (3.6T)
40 7814037088 1 freebsd-ufs (3.6T)
=40 7814037088 diskid/DISK-Z1Z0DQ73%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%
20%20%20%20 GPT (3.6T
7814037088 da11 GPT (3.6T)
40 7814037088 1 freebsd-ufs (3.6T)
root@:~ #
Then run a newfs and reboot the system. Upon reboot this is what I get?
=40 7814037088 da11 GPT (3.6T)
40 7814037088 1 freebsd-ufs (3.6T)
=40 7814037088 diskid/DISK
da11p1 added
root@:~ # gpart show da11
=40 7814037088 da11 GPT (3.6T)
40 7814037088 1 freebsd-ufs (3.6T)
root@:~ #
Then run a newfs and reboot the system. Upon reboot this is what I get?
=40 7814037088 da11 GPT (3.6T
not access them.
Also, what is proper way to attach dma into system instead of senndmal
now?
I'm not sure what the permissions of those files should really be, but
this is likely what you want in mailer.conf:
sendmail/usr/libexec/dma
send-mail /usr/libexec/dma
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I've tried 440 with owner 25:25 and mail l...@serebryakov.spb.ru
complains, that it could not access them.
Also, what is proper way to attach dma into system instead of senndmal now?
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
On 2014-03-24 06:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I've tried 440 with owner 25:25 and mail l...@serebryakov.spb.ru
complains, that it could not access them.
Also, what is proper way to attach dma into system instead of senndmal
now?
I'm not sure what the permissions
, that it could not access them.
Also, what is proper way to attach dma into system instead of senndmal
now?
I'm not sure what the permissions of those files should really be, but
this is likely what you want in mailer.conf:
sendmail/usr/libexec/dma
send-mail /usr/libexec/dma
mailq
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 07:16 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
On 2014-03-24 06:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I've tried 440 with owner 25:25 and mail l...@serebryakov.spb.ru
complains, that it could not access them.
Also, what is proper way to attach dma into system
Hello, Benjamin.
You wrote 24 марта 2014 г., 16:48:55:
BV DMA should have a read access on both files, nothing more.
Question is: from which user it will be run?
Give /etc/dma/auth.conf world-read doesn't seen to be good idea!
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
Hi Lev,
You can set the owner of conf files to root:mail and give read access only
to the mail group.
Regards,
--
Ben
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello, Benjamin.
You wrote 24 марта 2014 г., 16:48:55:
BV DMA should have a read access on both
On 16.10.13 08:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
nslookup(1) was deprecated about a decade ago because it often provides
misleading results when used for DNS troubleshooting. It generally works
fine for simply turning a name to an address or vice-versa.
People should really use host(1) for simple
On 2013-10-16 05:44, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 16.10.13 08:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
nslookup(1) was deprecated about a decade ago because it often provides
misleading results when used for DNS troubleshooting. It generally works
fine for simply turning a name to an address or vice-versa.
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 16.10.13 08:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
nslookup(1) was deprecated about a decade ago because it often provides
misleading results when used for DNS troubleshooting. It generally
works fine for simply turning a name to an address or vice-versa.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/12/13 10:28 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:14:28AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
...
Thanks for info!
Glad to help.
I saw that bind was removed from the current branch because of
On 10/12/13 10:28 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:14:28AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
...
Thanks for info!
Glad to help.
I saw that bind was removed from the current branch because of security
problems,
It was removed, but I believe that there was a bit more to it
I thought I sent this message yesterday, but couldn't find it in the downloaded
list messages, so maybe I forgot.
Whatever happened to /usr/bin/nslookup in FreeBSD-current, and what is one
supposed to use in its place?
I see nslookup is in FreeBSD 9.2, but why not in -current?
There has been
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:10:26PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
...
Whatever happened to /usr/bin/nslookup in FreeBSD-current, and what is one
supposed to use in its place?
Use host.
nslookup was part of BIND, and has been deprecated for years (IIRC).
Peace,
david
--
David H
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:10:26PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
...
Whatever happened to /usr/bin/nslookup in FreeBSD-current, and what is one
supposed to use in its place?
Use host.
nslookup was part of BIND, and has been deprecated for years (IIRC).
Peace,
david
--
David H
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:14:28AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
...
Thanks for info!
Glad to help.
I saw that bind was removed from the current branch because of security
problems,
It was removed, but I believe that there was a bit more to it than
security problems.
but didn't know
On 10/11/2013 7:14 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:10:26PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
...
Whatever happened to /usr/bin/nslookup in FreeBSD-current, and
what is one supposed to use in its place?
Use host.
nslookup was part of BIND, and has been deprecated
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 02:23:07AM +0300, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:46:50 -0700
John Reynolds john...@reynoldsnet.org wrote:
Hello all,
I was just wondering what the status of KMS support with newcons is?
About 6 weeks ago I got some help on x11@ and much
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:46:50 -0700
John Reynolds john...@reynoldsnet.org wrote:
Hello all,
I was just wondering what the status of KMS support with newcons is?
About 6 weeks ago I got some help on x11@ and much was said about KMS
(and the lack of support for the 'newer' Haswell graphics
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:46:50 -0700
John Reynolds john...@reynoldsnet.org wrote:
Hello all,
I was just wondering what the status of KMS support with newcons is?
About 6 weeks ago I got some help on x11@ and much was said about KMS
(and the lack
On 09/19/13 16:23, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
Hello John! I can't say anything about Haswell support, but newcons
works, sometimes :) Just not now. I've currently doing some redesign,
so it is broken last week. Hope I will done something for wide testing
in a week or so, but I'm afraid it will
Hello all,
I was just wondering what the status of KMS support with newcons is?
About 6 weeks ago I got some help on x11@ and much was said about KMS
(and the lack of support for the 'newer' Haswell graphics). somebody
mentioned that one of the problems where the console goes away once
you
understood what I was doing. Woot!
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
make for an awesome cheap 802.11s device.
Awesome stuff Adrian!
How is FreeBSD performance on Carambola2?
What do you have btw, is it Cambola2 soldered version?
The details and instructions are here:
http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-wifi-build/wiki/Carambola2
Seriously cool stuff
I've been using 10.0 current for a few months now with no problem.
What I do know about virtual machines is that they don't share kernel
resources too well. If both virtual machines are trying to access the
kernel, there will be a problem.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev da
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:21:33PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
I've been trying to install fresh -CURRENT (in VirtualBox/i386), and since
recent snapshots did not work for me, had to do this by first installing
from 9.1-release .iso. After svn co .../head /usr/src and standard make
Hi there,
I've been trying to install fresh -CURRENT (in VirtualBox/i386), and since
recent snapshots did not work for me, had to do this by first installing
from 9.1-release .iso. After svn co .../head /usr/src and standard make
world/kernel/mergemaster procedure (w/out any custom settings in
Hello, Freebsd-current.
Now, after Brook Davis work, it is possible to build world with both
WITHOUT_CLANGF and WITHOUT_GCC set. Or it isn't?
Problem is, that when WITHOUT_CLANG is set, all warning-suppression
options are set as fro GCC. What is plainly wrong. buildworld fails:
/usr/bin/cc
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 17 мая 2013 г., 0:03:30:
LS Problem is, that when WITHOUT_CLANG is set, all warning-suppression
LS options are set as fro GCC. What is plainly wrong. buildworld fails:
Setting COMPILER_TYPE=clang seems to help (build is not finished
yet, but passes first fail point
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175546
--
Best Regards,
Michael Pounov
ELWIX - embedded lightweight unix -
WWW: http://www.elwix.org/
EMail: mi...@elwix.org
Skype: mpunov
XMPP: mi...@aitnet.org
Phone: +359 888 737358; +359 899 737358
___
On 8/28/12 3:44 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, August 27, 2012 4:47:13 pm Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, John.
You wrote 27 августа 2012 г., 20:26:03:
What fast tasks are performed via this queue? Under network load it
is main consumer of CPU.
JB Certain NIC drivers perform much
Hello, Andrey.
You wrote 29 августа 2012 г., 11:17:09:
AZ If you have more than one CPU, you can try this patch [1]. It adds
I have only one cput (Geode LX 500 Mhz) without any HT or other
virtual CPUs at all. One core, one thread :)
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
On Monday, August 27, 2012 4:47:13 pm Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, John.
You wrote 27 августа 2012 г., 20:26:03:
What fast tasks are performed via this queue? Under network load it
is main consumer of CPU.
JB Certain NIC drivers perform much of their interrupt handling in that
thread
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 27 августа 2012 г., 6:19:57:
I've found (with help of debug printing added to kernel), that swi5
has only one handler Fast task queue (name is too long to be seen in
`top' output, may be, rename it to fast tqueue?)
What fast tasks are performed via this queue? Under
tqueue?)
What fast tasks are performed via this queue? Under network load it
is main consumer of CPU.
Certain NIC drivers perform much of their interrupt handling in that thread.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hello, John.
You wrote 27 августа 2012 г., 20:26:03:
What fast tasks are performed via this queue? Under network load it
is main consumer of CPU.
JB Certain NIC drivers perform much of their interrupt handling in that thread.
Yep, I've found, that my if_vr uses it. One more question: does
Hello, Freebsd-current.
It is shown at top -SH output as `intr{swi5: +}' and I could not find
way to understand, what is it...
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http
I'm sorry it's about VIMAGE option.
-- Eir Nym
On 14 November 2011 02:52, Eir Nym eir...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see it in NOTES for LINT and amd64/i386 arch, but it's
possible to turn it on. Can I consider that this option is currently
experimental and shouldn't be used critical places?
I don't see it in NOTES for LINT and amd64/i386 arch, but it's
possible to turn it on. Can I consider that this option is currently
experimental and shouldn't be used critical places?
-- Eir Nym
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
to install it. Do you really want to show the
public such a lack of pride in doing a complete job. In its current
condition bsdinstall is not ready to be released. It gives the public
the wrong impression (image) of what a great OS Freebsd is. Too many
developers and other volunteers have invested
that seemed unlikely...
and SYNCDHCP makes things even worse. (i have no idea what
SYNCDHCP is supposed to do, but in my experience:) SYNCDHCP makes
the boot process wait until DHCP server replies before proceeding.
SYNCDHCP is actually almost the same as DHCP, except that
SYNCDHCP waits indefinitely
SYNCDHCP in your interface config, but you had obviously read the
manual for rc.conf(5), so that seemed unlikely...
and SYNCDHCP makes things even worse. (i have no idea what
SYNCDHCP is supposed to do, but in my experience:) SYNCDHCP makes
the boot process wait until DHCP server replies before
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, deeptec...@gmail.com
deeptec...@gmail.comwrote:
the boot process of my FreeBSD machines takes a relatively long time.
it spends 30 seconds idling at some point, because my network
interface (sk0) is supposed to have an IP address assigned via DHCP,
and the
not sure what the policy is on
old stuff under vendor/
I think it all depends on how valuable the merge history from
/vendor/CSRG/dist/usr.bin/unifdef to /vendor/unifdef/dist is. IMO it
isn't, because we won't be merging from the CSRG code anymore.
So I'd prefer the second option
But then again, the first steps could also be:
$ svn cp head/usr.bin/unifdef vendor/unifdef/dist; svn ci
$ svn cp vendor/unifdef/dist vendor/unifdef/2.3; svn ci
This seems more reasonable to me, but I'm not sure what the policy is on
old stuff under vendor
this is about importing unifdef 2.4, which has no significant code
changes, but that's not the point.
I maintain unifdef and I haven't imported 2.4 because there are no code
changes. Please leave it alone.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/
HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT
On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 17:18:43 +, Tony Finch wrote:
this is about importing unifdef 2.4, which has no significant code
changes, but that's not the point.
I maintain unifdef and I haven't imported 2.4 because there are no code
changes. Please leave it alone.
As I wrote, that's beside
On 7 Nov 2010, at 21:29, Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
As I wrote, that's beside the point and not the question at hand. How/where
should it end up in our tree? Is it vendor code? Is it contrib code? And if
so how to bootstrap the correct subversion history ...
It is FreeBSD
Hi all,
there are some consequences that we can see from the grep case. Here I'd
like to add a summary, which raises some questions. All comments are
welcome.
1, When grep entered -CURRENT and bugs were found I immediately got kind
bug reports and sharp criticism, as well. According to my
On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Hi all,
there are some consequences that we can see from the grep case. Here I'd like
to add a summary, which raises some questions. All comments are welcome.
1, When grep entered -CURRENT and bugs were found I immediately got kind bug
. It
is BSD-licensed, supports wchar and POSIX(ish) regexes and it is quite fast.
I know it's C++ and not exactly what you're needing, but have you evaluated
Boost::Regex? Isn't there some code that can be retrofitted into a C lib?
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/libs/regex/doc/html/index.html
Hi there,
I've been providing a light-use samba server on my
freebsd-current box, mostly for secondary storage my wife's
laptop. It's worked mostly-fine for a dozen years. I've never
seen anything like this before, and am not sure where to start
poking it. Here's the output of netstat and ps,
Hi all,
Just another note: the system logs this morning had a couple of
LOR reports that I haven't seen before:
+lock order reversal:
+ 1st 0xff00027e5400 if_addr_mtx (if_addr_mtx) @
/nb/src/sys/netinet/igmp.c:1710
+ 2nd 0x80e5bdc0 ifnet_rw (ifnet_rw) @ /nb/src/sys/net/if.c:225
+
searched the mailing list archives for
the two platforms, but could not find the info that I
was looking for. So, what is the status of the AMD64
and IA64 ports; particularly in regards to large memory
configurations (i.e, max memory per platform and max
memory per process on the platform
Hi.
I would like to get an Audigy2 Platnum card working on my AMD dual
processor system. I'm 5.1-CURRENT but I tend to hang back a little.
I have device pcm and device sbc in the kernel. When the system
didn't figure out the card I added device firewire device sbp and
device fwe to the
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:08:07 -0400
From: Tom Parquette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
I would like to get an Audigy2 Platnum card working on my AMD dual
processor system. I'm 5.1-CURRENT but I tend to hang back a little.
I have device pcm and device sbc in the
|
HCFG_MUTEBUTTONENABLE, 4);
@@ -1262,6 +1565,12 @@
emu_wrptr(sc, 0, SOLEL, 0);
emu_wrptr(sc, 0, SOLEH, 0);
+ /* wonder what these do... */
+ if (sc-audigy) {
+ emu_wrptr(sc, 0, SPBYPASS, 0xf00);
+ emu_wrptr(sc, 0, AC97SLOT, 0x3
.
If there are so many working patches around, isn't it time that one of them
gets in the tree? What is the problem here?
Arjan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
that his
patches work with both the SB Live! and the Audigy.
If there are so many working patches around, isn't it time that one of them
gets in the tree? What is the problem here?
I haven't check his in a while, but many of the patches running around
are a complete rewrite of the emu10k
sysinstall-help and most of my web research says that the
way to be sure about what to use is to boot to dos or windows and
see what it says. That is hardly convenient as my only use of Intel
based systems has been confined to {NeXT,Open}Step and now
FreeBSD. What does DOS know that FreeBSD
/sparc64/sparc64/src/sys/kern/kern_ktr.c:270:
warning: unused variable `c'
*** Error code 1
What gives ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can
On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 11:00:40 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The reason I keep saying that is that nobody knows for sure. Nobody
has reverse engineered anything, got sued and won (or lost). Just
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: Can they now take they took relevant steps as a defence in a law court?
That's a very interesting question.
Which might get answered since some industrious folks aligned with a
certain other open source operating system are in the process of
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Doug White wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: Can they now take they took relevant steps as a defence in a law court?
That's a very interesting question.
Which might get answered since some industrious folks aligned with a
certain other open source
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wesley Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Doug White wrote:
:
: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: : Can they now take they took relevant steps as a defence in a law court?
:
: That's a very interesting question.
:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The reason I keep saying that is that nobody knows for sure. Nobody
: has reverse engineered anything, got sued and won (or lost). Just
However, there are one or two cases that are close to relevant working
no. Even in a redacted spec it would be painfully obvious
: what to do. Also, different regulatory domains have different
: frequencies that are real no-nos in other regulatory domains and
: they'd need to document how to properly generate the RF in both
: cases.
:
: So, assuming that there's
:
: : Can't they just redact that information from the spec.?
:
: Typically no. Even in a redacted spec it would be painfully obvious
: what to do. Also, different regulatory domains have different
: frequencies that are real no-nos in other regulatory domains and
: they'd need to document how
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:21:23 -0400
The folks at Broadcom have not been willing to release any information
on their 800.11g chips for fear of violating FCC regs. The required
NDA would prohibit the
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris BeHanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Can't they just redact that information from the spec.?
Typically no. Even in a redacted spec it would be painfully obvious
what to do. Also, different regulatory domains have different
frequencies
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris BeHanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Can't they just redact that information from the spec.?
Typically no. Even in a redacted spec it would be painfully obvious
what to do. Also, different
Folks,
Okay, so now I just figured out what the ath driver is. Sigh...
Of course, I find this out through searching for open source
drivers for the Broadcom chipset as used in the Linksys WPC54G
cardbus device, which I happen to have just bought.
I've already done quite a bit of Googling
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:32:13 +0200
From: Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks,
Okay, so now I just figured out what the ath driver is. Sigh...
Of course, I find this out through searching for open source
drivers for the Broadcom chipset
Folks,
Okay, so now I just figured out what the ath driver is. Sigh...
Of course, I find this out through searching for open source
drivers for the Broadcom chipset as used in the Linksys WPC54G
cardbus device, which I happen to have just bought.
I've already done quite a bit
From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:21:23 -0400
The folks at Broadcom have not been willing to release any information
on their 800.11g chips for fear of violating FCC regs. The required
NDA would prohibit the release of the source. You can program
both
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:21:23PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
Folks,
...
Can anyone provide some pointers or links that would bring me
up-to-date on the current state of affairs on this subject,
especially as it related to FreeBSD or *BSD in general?
The folks at Broadcom
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:21:23PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
Why would Broadcom be scared? Obviously it's the _driver_ that controls the
power/freq output of the chip, so the responsibility of staying within FCC
regs is that of the driver authors. Of course, the no warranty aspects of
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 03:42:04AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
in several places in ipfw2.c i have to move pointers across
structures of variable length (lists of ipfw2 instructions
returned by the getsockopt()), and i use the following type of code:
void
I just got a panic. As I have never had one before, I don't know what to
do. It's on another system so I don't have to reboot immediately (that
would solve the problem temporarily, wouldn't it?) if someone would give
me some advice, I could try to help debug it; however, as I'm not a
coder
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:24:44AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 March 2003 at 13:35:28 +, Jason Morgan wrote:
I just got a panic. As I have never had one before, I don't know what to
do. It's on another system so I don't have to reboot immediately (that
would solve
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 07:54 pm, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 March 2003 at 13:35:28 +, Jason Morgan wrote:
I just got a panic. As I have never had one before, I don't know what to
do. It's on another system so I don't have to reboot immediately (that
would solve
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 12:54:16AM -0500, taxman wrote:
that gives an error that is similiar to:
WARNING: syntax error on file /boot/loader.conf
dumpdev=/dev/ad0s1b
^
Hi Tim,
Please do 'dumpdev=/dev/ad0s1b. The doube quotes is a must .
Jiawei
--
Without the userland, the
301 - 400 of 598 matches
Mail list logo
